在SystemVerilog中,我面临一个有趣的问题,在这里,与寄存器的比较不起作用。
module VGA_Colours
(
input wire clk, reset,
// input wire [3:0] swred, swgreen,
// input wire [1:0] swblue,
output wire hsync, vsync,
output wire [3:0] r, g, b
);
// constant declarations for VGA sync parameters
localparam H_DISPLAY = 640; // horizontal display area
localparam H_L_BORDER = 48; // horizontal left border
localparam H_R_BORDER = 16; // horizontal right border
localparam H_RETRACE = 96; // horizontal retrace
localparam H_MAX = H_DISPLAY + H_L_BORDER + H_R_BORDER + H_RETRACE - 1;
localparam START_H_RETRACE = H_DISPLAY + H_R_BORDER;
localparam END_H_RETRACE = H_DISPLAY + H_R_BORDER + H_RETRACE - 1;
localparam V_DISPLAY = 480; // vertical display area
localparam V_T_BORDER = 10; // vertical top border
localparam V_B_BORDER = 33; // vertical bottom border
localparam V_RETRACE = 2; // vertical retrace
localparam V_MAX = V_DISPLAY + V_T_BORDER + V_B_BORDER + V_RETRACE - 1;
localparam START_V_RETRACE = V_DISPLAY + V_B_BORDER;
localparam END_V_RETRACE = V_DISPLAY + V_B_BORDER + V_RETRACE - 1;
wire video_on, p_tick;
reg [9:0] ii;
reg j;
reg [3:0] red_reg, green_reg, blue_reg;
reg [11:0] rbg;
// mod-2 counter to generate 25 MHz pixel tick
reg pixel_reg = 0;
wire pixel_next;
wire pixel_tick;
always @(posedge clk)
pixel_reg <= pixel_next;
assign pixel_next = ~pixel_reg; // next state is complement of current
assign pixel_tick = (pixel_reg == 0); // assert tick half of the time
// registers to keep track of current pixel location
reg [9:0] h_count_reg, h_count_next, v_count_reg, v_count_next;
// register to keep track of vsync and hsync signal states
reg vsync_reg, hsync_reg;
wire vsync_next, hsync_next;
// infer registers
always @(posedge clk)
if(~reset)
begin
v_count_reg <= 0;
h_count_reg <= 0;
vsync_reg <= 0;
hsync_reg <= 0;
end
else
begin
v_count_reg <= v_count_next;
h_count_reg <= h_count_next;
vsync_reg <= vsync_next;
hsync_reg <= hsync_next;
end
// next-state logic of horizontal vertical sync counters
always @*
begin
h_count_next = pixel_tick ?
h_count_reg == H_MAX ? 0 : h_count_reg + 1
: h_count_reg;
v_count_next = pixel_tick && h_count_reg == H_MAX ?
(v_count_reg == V_MAX ? 0 : v_count_reg + 1)
: v_count_reg;
end
// hsync and vsync are active low signals
// hsync signal asserted during horizontal retrace
assign hsync_next = h_count_reg >= START_H_RETRACE
&& h_count_reg <= END_H_RETRACE;
// vsync signal asserted during vertical retrace
assign vsync_next = v_count_reg >= START_V_RETRACE
&& v_count_reg <= END_V_RETRACE;
// video only on when pixels are in both horizontal and vertical display region
assign video_on = (h_count_reg < H_DISPLAY)
&& (v_count_reg < V_DISPLAY);
// output signals
assign hsync = hsync_reg;
assign vsync = vsync_reg;
assign p_tick = pixel_tick;
always @(posedge p_tick) begin
if (~reset) begin
rbg <= 12'b000000000000;
ii <= 9'b0;
end else begin
if (h_count_reg == 0) begin
rbg <= 12'b000000000000;
ii <= 9'b0;
end else if (h_count_reg == ii) begin
ii <= ii + 9'b001010000;
rbg <= rbg + 12'b000010000000;
end
end
end
// output
assign r = (video_on) ? rbg[11:8] : 4'b0;
assign g = (video_on) ? rbg[7:4] : 4'b0;
assign b = (video_on) ? rbg[3:0] : 4'b0;
endmodule在上面的代码中,h_count_reg是0,工作正常。如果我将0更改为任何不同的数字,它就会像预期的那样工作。但是,如果我用一个变量(在我的模块顶部声明为reg[9:0] ii的"ii“)替换这个数字,代码似乎会忽略它,这是很奇怪的。用任何数字替换ii变量都可以。为什么?
TestBench文件:
module VGA_Colours_tb ();
logic clk;
reg reset;
wire hsync, vsync;
wire [3:0] r, g, b;
VGA_Colours scr0 (
.clk (clk),
.reset (reset),
.hsync (hsync),
.vsync (vsync),
.r (r),
.b (b),
.g (g)
);
initial begin
clk = 0;
forever #10 clk = ~clk;
end
always @(posedge clk) begin
#20
reset <= 1'b0;
#20
reset <= 1'b1;
#100000
$finish;
end
endmodule模拟波:

从代码中可以看到,当h_count_reg为==到ii时,增加rbg和ii的值。然而,基于模拟波,它并不是这样做的h_count_reg值不等于ii,而它实际上是。
发布于 2021-03-09 14:09:44
VGA_Colours模块中有一个逻辑错误。
下面是具有更一致缩进的代码:
always @(posedge p_tick) begin
if (~reset) begin
rbg <= 12'b000000000000;
ii <= 9'b0;
end else begin
if (h_count_reg == 0) begin
rbg <= 12'b000000000000;
ii <= 9'b0;
end else if (h_count_reg == ii) begin
rbg <= rbg + 12'b000010000000;
ii <= ii + 9'b001010000;
end
end
end当我运行您的模拟时,我观察到ii总是在初始重置之后为0。
代码有3条if语句。第一条if语句在模拟开始时为真,此时为reset=0。这将ii设置为0。
复位后,我看到h_count_reg=0 4次。这意味着第二个if语句是真实的4次。这使得ii = 0。
只有当if不是0时,第三个h_count_reg语句才会被计算。现在应该清楚的是,第三条if语句永远不可能是真的。这意味着ii不会增加,它将保持在0。例如,当h_count_reg=1时,(h_count_reg == ii)是false,因为ii总是0。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66524571
复制相似问题