我正在尝试使用Icarus Verilog在Verilog中编写和测试一个简单的16位宽RAM8芯片。我发现很难从概念上理解为什么iverilog模拟器会在某些时钟节拍上显示'x‘(未定义)值,并且想知道是否有人可以为这个问题提供概念上的理解。
我尝试了两种不同的设计,其中一种输出对我来说很有意义,但我无法解析第二种设计的输出。
第一种设计使out成为一个寄存器,对输出的赋值为时钟:
module RAM8(out, address, in, load, clk);
output[15:0] out;
input [15:0] in;
input [2:0] address;
input load, clk;
reg out; // out is a register
reg [15:0] ram [7:0]; // 8-element array of 16-bit wide reg
always @(posedge clk) begin
if (load)
ram[address] <= in;
out <= ram[address]; // clocked assignment
end
endmodule // RAM8而第二种设计,out是一个连续分配的线:
module RAM8(out, address, in, load, clk);
output[15:0] out;
input [15:0] in;
input [2:0] address;
input load, clk;
reg [15:0] ram [7:0]; // 8-element array of 16-bit wide reg
always @(posedge clk) begin
if (load)
ram[address] <= in;
end
assign out = ram[address]; // continuous assignment
endmodule // RAM8这两者的测试平台是相同的:
module RAM8_tb();
wire [15:0] out;
reg [15:0] in;
reg [2:0] address;
reg load;
reg clk;
RAM8 DUT (
.out(out),
.in(in),
.address(address),
.load(load),
.clk(clk)
);
initial begin
clk = 0;
load = 0;
address = 0;
in = 0;
#10 load = 1; address = 0; in = 0;
#10 load = 0; address = 0;
#10 load = 1; address = 1; in = 1;
#10 load = 0; address = 1;
#10 load = 1; address = 2; in = 2;
#10 load = 0; address = 2;
#10 load = 1; address = 3; in = 3;
#10 load = 0; address = 3;
#10 load = 1; address = 4; in = 4;
#10 load = 0; address = 4;
#10 load = 1; address = 5; in = 5;
end // initial begin
always #5 clk = ~clk;
initial #150 $stop;
initial
$monitor("At time %t, clk = %0d, load = %0d, address = %0d, in = %0d, out = %0d",
$time, clk, load, address, in, out);
endmodule // RAM8_tb我为第一个设计运行测试平台的输出是这样的:
At time 0, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 5, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 10, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 15, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 20, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 25, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = 0
At time 30, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 1, in = 1, out = 0
At time 35, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 1, in = 1, out = x
At time 40, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 1, in = 1, out = x
At time 45, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 1, in = 1, out = 1
At time 50, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 2, in = 2, out = 1
At time 55, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 2, in = 2, out = x
At time 60, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 2, in = 2, out = x
At time 65, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 2, in = 2, out = 2
At time 70, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 3, in = 3, out = 2
At time 75, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 3, in = 3, out = x
At time 80, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 3, in = 3, out = x
At time 85, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 3, in = 3, out = 3
At time 90, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 4, in = 4, out = 3
At time 95, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 4, in = 4, out = x
At time 100, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 4, in = 4, out = x
At time 105, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 4, in = 4, out = 4
At time 110, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 4
At time 115, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = x
At time 120, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = x
At time 125, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 130, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 135, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 140, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 145, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5这个输出对我来说很有意义。每次我加载一个新值时,输出都是未定义的,因为加载是与加载到输出寄存器的值同时发生的(因此,该时钟节拍的垃圾值)。
然而,第二个设计的测试平台的输出让我感到困惑:
At time 0, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 5, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 10, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 0, in = 0, out = x
At time 15, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 0, in = 0, out = 0
At time 20, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = 0
At time 25, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 0, in = 0, out = 0
At time 30, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 1, in = 1, out = x
At time 35, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 1, in = 1, out = 1
At time 40, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 1, in = 1, out = 1
At time 45, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 1, in = 1, out = 1
At time 50, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 2, in = 2, out = x
At time 55, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 2, in = 2, out = 2
At time 60, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 2, in = 2, out = 2
At time 65, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 2, in = 2, out = 2
At time 70, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 3, in = 3, out = x
At time 75, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 3, in = 3, out = 3
At time 80, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 3, in = 3, out = 3
At time 85, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 3, in = 3, out = 3
At time 90, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 4, in = 4, out = x
At time 95, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 4, in = 4, out = 4
At time 100, clk = 0, load = 0, address = 4, in = 4, out = 4
At time 105, clk = 1, load = 0, address = 4, in = 4, out = 4
At time 110, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = x
At time 115, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 120, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 125, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 130, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 135, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 140, clk = 0, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5
At time 145, clk = 1, load = 1, address = 5, in = 5, out = 5我的问题是:输出端的周期性未定义值是由什么引起的?共性似乎是当clk为0,负载为1时,但我对寄存器的理解无法解释为什么这会导致输出成为垃圾。在我的设计中,所有的寄存器都是在正时钟边沿触发的,那么为什么负边沿会改变任何值?
我想我可能会对这里发生的事情感到困惑,也希望有人能证实或反驳我对第一个设计的行为的解释。提前感谢所有花时间阅读和回答的人。
发布于 2018-12-29 10:15:23
在这两种情况下,得到的X值都是ram的初始值(因为您没有分配任何初始值,所以X值就是X)。如果您继续测试并遍历相同的地址,那么下一次您将看到之前编写的值。
在第一个示例中,并发读写不是问题。读取操作返回时钟边沿之前的值,而ram将包含时钟边沿之后的新值。
在第二个例子中,触发X的事件是address递增,而不是clk和load信号。由于out未注册且与clk没有关联,因此只要address发生更改,您就会看到该地址上的值出现在out上。然后,在写入新值的时钟沿之后,您会看到out同时更改为该值。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53965441
复制相似问题