我正在写一个求和的迭代解,它似乎给出了正确的答案。但是我的导师告诉我,它给non-commutative combine operations带来了错误的结果。我去了谷歌,但我仍然不确定它到底是什么意思……
下面是我写的递归代码:
def sum(term, a, next, b):
# First recursive version
if a > b:
return 0
else:
return term(a) + sum(term, next(a), next, b)
def accumulate(combiner, base, term, a, next, b):
# Improved version
if a > b:
return base
else:
return combiner(term(a), accumulate(combiner, base, term, next(a), next, b))
print(sum(lambda x: x, 1, lambda x: x, 5))
print(accumulate(lambda x,y: x+y, 0, lambda x: x, 1, lambda x: x, 5))
# Both solution equate to - 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 这是我编写的迭代版本,它给出了错误的non-commutative combine operations编辑结果:当lambda x,y: x- y用于组合器时,accumulate_iter给出了错误的结果
def accumulate_iter(combiner, null_value, term, a, next, b):
while a <= b:
null_value = combiner(term(a), null_value)
a = next(a)
return null_value希望有人能为这个迭代版本的accumulate提供一个解决方案
发布于 2019-02-17 10:23:23
当合并器是可交换的时,你的accumulate_iter工作得很好,但当合并器是非交换的时,它会给出不同的结果。这是因为递归accumulate从后面到前面组合元素,而迭代版本从前面到后面组合元素。
所以我们需要做的是让accumulate_iter从后面组合起来,下面是一个重写的accumulate_iter
def accumulate_iter(a, b, base, combiner, next, term):
# we want to combine from behind,
# but it's hard to do that since we are iterate from ahead
# here we first go through the process,
# and store the elements encounted into a list
l = []
while a <= b:
l.append(term(a))
a = next(a)
l.append(base)
print(l)
# now we can combine from behind!
while len(l)>1:
l[-2] = combiner(l[-2], l[-1])
l.pop()
return l[0]https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54723765
复制相似问题