这段C#代码经过测试可以正常工作,但在我看来效率很低。例如,对于1000行,如何避免每次foreach迭代的所有开销?
SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(strConn); // strConn is set elsewhere in the code
string strSQL = "select pkCustomer from Customer where YearEndDeactivateInd = 1";
SqlDataAdapter adap = new SqlDataAdapter(strSQL, con);
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
con.Open();
adap.Fill(dt);
foreach (DataRow row in dt.Rows)
{
string strSQL1 = "update Ticket set activeInd = 0 where fkCustomer = " + row["pkCustomer"].ToString();
SqlDataAdapter adap1 = new SqlDataAdapter(strSQL1, con);
DataTable dt1 = new DataTable();
adap1.Fill(dt1);
}
con.Close();我正在根据一个表的结果更新另一个表。我应该转而使用批量更新吗?
发布于 2020-09-24 05:53:25
像这样使用查询
update Ticket
set activeInd = 0
where fkCustomer in (
select pkCustomer
from Customer
where YearEndDeactivateInd = 1
)在没有适配器的情况下完成
using (var con = new SqlConnection(strConn))
{
string sql = "here query above";
con.Open();
using (var cmd = new SqlCommand(sql, con))
{
int rowsAffected = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
}发布于 2020-09-24 05:53:32
您可以在一个查询中完成所有这些操作。
例如:
UPDATE Ticket
SET activeInd = 0
WHERE
fkCustomer IN
(SELECT pkCustomer
FROM Customer
WHERE YearEndDeactivateInd = 1
) 或者更好:
UPDATE T
SET activeInd = 0
FROM
Ticket T
INNER JOIN Customer C
ON T.fkCustomer = C.pkCustomer
WHERE
C.YearEndDeactivateInd = 1无论哪种方式,SQL本身在这方面的效率都要高得多。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64036650
复制相似问题