在go中,我可以像这样写一个函数:
func pureFisherYates(s []int, swaps []int) []int {
newS := copy(s)
for i, _ := range newS {
for _, j := range swaps {
newS[i], newS[j] = newS[j], newS[i]
}
}
}对我来说,这似乎是一个纯粹的函数。在给定相同的输入的情况下,它总是返回相同的输出,并且它不会改变世界的状态(除了在某种严格意义上与任何其他函数相同的方式,占用cpu资源,产生热能等)。然而,每当我寻找如何做纯混洗时,我都会找到像this这样的东西,而每当我寻找特定的Haskell实现时,我要么得到一个使用列表实现的0^2 Fisher Yates,要么得到一个[a] -> IO [a]实现。是否存在[a] -> [a] O(n) shuffle ?如果不存在,为什么我上面的go实现不纯。
发布于 2019-06-19 15:48:24
ST monad正是允许这种封装的可变性,并且Data.Array.ST包含可以在ST中变异的数组,然后在外部返回一个不可变的版本。
https://wiki.haskell.org/Random_shuffle给出了使用ST的Fisher-Yates shuffle的两个实现。它们不是字面上的[a] -> [a],但这是因为随机数生成也需要处理:
import System.Random
import Data.Array.ST
import Control.Monad
import Control.Monad.ST
import Data.STRef
-- | Randomly shuffle a list without the IO Monad
-- /O(N)/
shuffle' :: [a] -> StdGen -> ([a],StdGen)
shuffle' xs gen = runST (do
g <- newSTRef gen
let randomRST lohi = do
(a,s') <- liftM (randomR lohi) (readSTRef g)
writeSTRef g s'
return a
ar <- newArray n xs
xs' <- forM [1..n] $ \i -> do
j <- randomRST (i,n)
vi <- readArray ar i
vj <- readArray ar j
writeArray ar j vi
return vj
gen' <- readSTRef g
return (xs',gen'))
where
n = length xs
newArray :: Int -> [a] -> ST s (STArray s Int a)
newArray n xs = newListArray (1,n) xs和
import Control.Monad
import Control.Monad.ST
import Control.Monad.Random
import System.Random
import Data.Array.ST
import GHC.Arr
shuffle :: RandomGen g => [a] -> Rand g [a]
shuffle xs = do
let l = length xs
rands <- forM [0..(l-2)] $ \i -> getRandomR (i, l-1)
let ar = runSTArray $ do
ar <- thawSTArray $ listArray (0, l-1) xs
forM_ (zip [0..] rands) $ \(i, j) -> do
vi <- readSTArray ar i
vj <- readSTArray ar j
writeSTArray ar j vi
writeSTArray ar i vj
return ar
return (elems ar)
*Main> evalRandIO (shuffle [1..10])
[6,5,1,7,10,4,9,2,8,3]编辑:与Go代码一样,使用固定的swaps参数,代码非常简单
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
import Data.Array.ST
import Data.Foldable
import Control.Monad.ST
shuffle :: forall a. [a] -> [Int] -> [a]
shuffle xs swaps = runST $ do
let n = length xs
ar <- newListArray (1,n) xs :: ST s (STArray s Int a)
for_ [1..n] $ \i ->
for_ swaps $ \j -> do
vi <- readArray ar i
vj <- readArray ar j
writeArray ar j vi
writeArray ar i vj
getElems ar但我不确定你是否可以合理地将其称为Fisher-Yates shuffle。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56660901
复制相似问题