我有一些我用Fortran 95编写的有限元代码,我已经对它们进行了优化,现在我可以得到16Mil以上的数据。在2 2GB内存占用下工作的元素。
我的代码的源函数不是平滑的,所以我使用(分层的)蒙特卡洛方法进行积分,这需要一个随机数生成器来选择样本位置
我尝试过使用-fopenmp -Ofast -ftree-parallelize-loops=4使用gfortran-9进行编译,但是使用随机数生成器的循环不能并行运行。我尝试过do concurrent,但显然不起作用,因为random_number不是“纯粹的”。https://stackoverflow.com/a/32637737/2372254我也试过阻塞我的循环,但也不起作用。
下面是我正在讨论的代码
do k=1,n_els ! total elements is n_els**2. This is block
do i=1+ (k-1)*n_els ,k*n_els
supp_vec = 0
integ_vec = 0.0_wp
! in this subroutine I call random_number
call do_element(ind, n_els, i, num_points_per_strat, &
strat_rows, strat_cols, supp_vec, integ_vec)
do j=1, 4
sc_vec(supp_vec(j) ) = integ_vec(j)
end do
! give some info about progress
if (mod( i , (n_els**2)/10) == 0) print*, i*10/((n_els**2)/10), "% done"
end do
end do似乎我可以将块写到一个文件中,然后调用n例程的不同实例。我想一定有一种更干净的方法来做到这一点。有什么建议可以让它更快地进行吗?
我正在考虑首先将一个块大小的点(取决于内存限制)写到一个数组中,然后在子例程调用中提供它。在我尝试之前,我想我会看看是否有人有更好的方法的建议。在可能的情况下尽量减少内存占用将是一件很好的事情。
发布于 2019-10-19 02:30:36
在版本7和更新版本中,GFortran有一个并行的随机数生成器。在实现它时,下面是我用来验证性能是否确实随着线程数量的增加而扩展的OpenMP代码(来自https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02110.html ):
! Benchmark generating random numbers
! Janne Blomqvist 2015
program randbench
#ifdef _OPENMP
use omp_lib
#endif
implicit none
integer, parameter :: dp=kind(0.d0) ! double precision
integer, parameter :: i64 = selected_int_kind(18) ! At least 64-bit integer
#ifdef _OPENMP
print *, "Using up to ", omp_get_max_threads(), " threads."
#endif
call genr4
call genr8
contains
subroutine genr4
integer, parameter :: n = int(1e7)
real, save :: r(n)
integer :: i
integer(i64) :: t1, t2, td
#ifdef _OPENMP
integer :: blocks, blocksize, l, h
#endif
Print *, "Generate default real random variables"
call system_clock (t1)
!$omp parallel do private(i)
do i = 1, n
call random_number(r(i))
end do
!$omp end parallel do
call system_clock (t2)
td = t2 - t1
print *, "Generating ", n, " default reals individually took ", td, " ticks."
call system_clock (t1)
#ifdef _OPENMP
blocks = omp_get_max_threads()
blocksize = n / blocks
!$omp parallel do private(l,h,i)
do i = 0, blocks - 1
l = i * blocksize + 1
h = l + blocksize - 1
!print *, "Low: ", l, " High: ", h
call random_number(r(l:h))
end do
#else
call random_number(r)
#endif
Call system_clock (t2)
print *, "Generating ", n, " default reals as an array took ", t2-t1, &
" ticks. => ind/arr = ", real(td, dp) / (t2-t1)
end subroutine genr4
subroutine genr8
integer, parameter :: n = int(1e7)
real(dp), save :: r(n)
integer :: i
integer(i64) :: t1, t2, td
#ifdef _OPENMP
integer :: blocks, blocksize, l, h
#endif
print *, "Generate double real random variables"
call system_clock (t1)
!$omp parallel do
do i = 1, n
call random_number(r(i))
end do
call system_clock (t2)
td = t2 - t1
print *, "Generating ", n, " double reals individually took ", td, " ticks."
call system_clock (t1)
#ifdef _OPENMP
blocks = omp_get_max_threads()
blocksize = n / blocks
!$omp parallel do private(l,h,i)
do i = 0, blocks - 1
l = i * blocksize + 1
h = l + blocksize - 1
!print *, "Low: ", l, " High: ", h
call random_number(r(l:h))
end do
#else
call random_number(r)
#endif
call system_clock (t2)
print *, "Generating ", n, " double reals as an array took ", t2-t1, &
" ticks. => ind/arr = ", real(td, dp) / (t2 -t1)
end subroutine genr8
end programhttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/58450104
复制相似问题