我有一个简单的方法,它接收交易列表(描述和id )并返回所选交易的id。如果未选择任何选项,系统将要求您进行确认。我使用python-inquirer来做这件事:
# question.py
from typing import List, Tuple
import inquirer
def select_trades(trades: List[Tuple[str, int]]) -> List[int]:
while True:
selection = inquirer.prompt(
[
inquirer.Checkbox(
"trades",
message=(
"Select auction trades? "
"(press space to select and enter to finish)"
),
choices=trades,
)
]
)["trades"]
if len(selection) == 0:
answer = inquirer.prompt(
[
inquirer.List(
"",
message="No trade selected.\nDo you confirm?",
choices=["Yes", "No"],
)
]
)[""]
if answer == "Yes":
return []
else:
break
return selection我做了两个测试用例。如果选择了无,则不确认,再次选择无并确认。在另一种情况下,您选择id 1:
# test_question.py
from unittest.mock import patch
from question import select_trades
@patch(
"inquirer.prompt",
side_effect=[{"trades": []}, {"": "No"}, {"trades": []}, {"": "Yes"}],
)
def test_select_trades_empty(mock_inquirer_prompt) -> None:
trades = [("trade 1", 0), ("trade 2", 1)]
assert select_trades(trades) == []
@patch("inquirer.prompt", return_value={"trades": [1]})
def test_select_trades_some_selected(mock_inquirer_prompt) -> None:
trades = [("trade 1", 0), ("trade 2", 1)]
assert select_trades(trades) == [1]由于某种原因,覆盖率表明break like没有被覆盖,但在第二个测试用例中,while True中断并返回测试的期望值。我不明白为什么在这个案例中没有100%覆盖它。
发布于 2020-05-11 08:46:35
这是由于Python对跳转进行了优化,使得Coverage.py无法看到这一行被覆盖(https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/198)。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61717745
复制相似问题