为什么我的新域电子邮件触发垃圾邮件过滤器？

Question

我最近购买并建立了一个新的域名，用谷歌应用软件发送电子邮件，但注意到我的许多电子邮件都会变成垃圾邮件。我浏览了isnotspam.com垃圾邮件报告，得到了这份报告。这份报告相当混乱，因为它标记我为“中性”或“非垃圾邮件”，我有一个低垃圾邮件水平，但我有一个“X垃圾邮件-旗帜”的yes。这是怎么发生的，我能做些什么吗？

其他可能的因素: 1)我们与Mandrill一起建立了DKIM和SPF记录，用于从单独的帐户发送自动电子邮件。2)我发送的域(ovidlife.com)被设置为我使用的旧域(agentalk.com)的别名，因为我使用的是Google for Business的遗留版本。

This message is an automatic response from isNOTspam's authentication verifier service. The service allows email senders to perform a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at .

Thank you for using isNOTspam.

The isNOTspam team

==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================

SPF Check : neutral
Sender-ID Check : neutral
DomainKeys Check : neutral
DKIM Check : neutral
SpamAssassin Check : ham (non-spam)
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================

HELO hostname: mail-qk0-f175.google.com
Source IP: 209.85.220.175
mail-from: lingke.wang@ovidlife.com
Anonymous To: ins-eu0b0wy1@isnotspam.com
---------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------

Result: neutral
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=lingke.wang@ovidlife.com
DNS record(s):
ovidlife.com.   3600    IN  TXT "v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com ?all"


----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------

Result: neutral

ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=lingke.wang@ovidlife.com
DNS record(s):
ovidlife.com.   3600    IN  TXT "v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com ?all"


----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------

Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=lingke.wang@ovidlife.com
Selector=
domain=
DomainKeys DNS Record=

----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------

Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=lingke.wang@ovidlife.com
Selector=
domain=
DomainKeys DNS Record=

----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-19)

Result: ham (non-spam) (02.8points, 10.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------


* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
* trust
* [209.85.220.175 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.8 required=-20.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Score: 2.8

To learn more about the terms used in the SpamAssassin report, please search
here: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/

==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (adapted from 
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-04.txt):
==========================================================

"pass"
the message passed the authentication test.

"fail"
the message failed the authentication test.

"softfail"
the message failed the authentication test, and the authentication
method has either an explicit or implicit policy which doesn't require
successful authentication of all messages from that domain.

"neutral"
the authentication method completed without errors, but was unable
to reach either a positive or a negative result about the message.

"temperror"
a temporary (recoverable) error occurred attempting to authenticate
the sender; either the process couldn't be completed locally, or
there was a temporary failure retrieving data required for the
authentication. A later retry may produce a more final result.

"permerror"
a permanent (unrecoverable) error occurred attempting to
authenticate the sender; either the process couldn't be completed
locally, or there was a permanent failure retrieving data required
for the authentication.


==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================

From lingke.wang@agentalk.com Wed May 06 00:28:30 2015
Return-path: <lingke.wang@agentalk.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
s15387396.onlinehome-server.com
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Report: 
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
* trust
* [209.85.220.175 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.8 required=-20.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Envelope-to: ins-eu0b0wy1@isnotspam.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 May 2015 00:28:30 -0500
Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175])
by s15387396.onlinehome-server.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <lingke.wang@agentalk.com>)
id 1Yprsk-0006cc-2m
for ins-eu0b0wy1@isnotspam.com; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:28:30 -0500
Received: by qkhg7 with SMTP id g7so121155672qkh.2
for <ins-eu0b0wy1@isnotspam.com>; Tue, 05 May 2015 22:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject
:to:content-type;
bh=BuYjUCScdfsZH82/Fy62ARKDF+0/iZqYNLJE5KWQaSk=;
b=IZBBisLWuhGveNuUsNP+2ipe7QQjzUhXm1Kjqk9/SH5OYr5DrkmeGkqSDxXufRBX3N
HtPmbHdgr4tCNGD4x+/Ygne9M/V0uCJ77R1FD+RhkuiQwAl2fKbYCneCMEq59J6Phnme
og0FTCJXpj1WgjjMSxDdgHIH0gLB3F5gzxSb04m+Hi3eAOhRk00IY/TqyMUDxb6MkdSD
Qs91RhiMdUICRZ3/HutAX/CXacjaXg1aPrXh6j2EAmjnBwp9zY48oGvXxex+h3gZyl3o
Xr4UmCL1Qhmvs2iwc3dXcf5xh4Hd6iFaYRqHFziHTly51xGybVACCl+89X46K8JCN4rp
fm1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcBFG9lQd+Z/xiYc5ON7jyWUnGor2+GNck6D72IUkPkp+bgeQNrVQJWotBee/nFCtjM5HB
X-Received: by 10.55.43.83 with SMTP id r80mr63695418qkh.80.1430890102691;
Tue, 05 May 2015 22:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lingke.wang@agentalk.com
Received: by 10.229.215.132 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 22:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [171.66.144.28]
From: Lingke Wang <lingke.wang@ovidlife.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 22:28:02 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: bAYPIBN9rjuXHKp9e-iguZxogf8
Message-ID: <CABS-Rt-B-ercSAMM5d2YM7M203_qQW11X0LrMg3fQm4SC+ph0A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: test email
To: ins-eu0b0wy1@isnotspam.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147af3448aa9d0515631032
--001a1147af3448aa9d0515631032
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

test email

-- 
Best,
Lingke

--001a1147af3448aa9d0515631032
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr">test email<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Best,<div>Lingke</div></div></div>
</div>

--001a1147af3448aa9d0515631032--

是的，我查过了，用户绝对不是垃圾邮件。这是一个非常新的域名，所以几乎没有发送任何消息.

几天前，我确实收到了一封奇怪的电子邮件，其中一个主域名的帐户(ovidlife.com是agentalk.com的别名)有一些漏洞。虽然经过检查，我什么也没看到.

The following is an automated security notification from Google about your domain accounts.

It has come to our attention that some of your user accounts might have been compromised and are being used to send spam from your domain: agentalk.com

The following users in your Google Apps domain appear to be affected:




lingke.wang@agentalk.com

We have disabled the users in a way that they can be recovered by the admin. Please follow the actions below before you re-enable these users.

Answer 1

你有没有检查过用户是否真的没有垃圾邮件？

我遇到了一个类似的问题，它是与用户有关的，实际上并不是技术性的。

在执行反病毒策略之后，就不会再有垃圾邮件列表了。