我面临以下问题: btrfs报告在设备/dev/sdd上为扇区128编写错误:
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Invalid command failure
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Write(10): 2a 08 00 00 00 80 00 00 08 00
end_request: critical target error, dev sdd, sector 128
BTRFS: lost page write due to I/O error on /dev/sdd
BTRFS: bdev /dev/sdd errs: wr 913238, rd 1, flush 150, corrupt 0, gen 0我运行了badblocks /dev/sdd,它没有返回任何坏块。无论如何,我决定保持安全(在某种程度上),创建一个从2048扇区(默认)开始的分区:
# fdisk -l /dev/sdd
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdd1 2048 234441647 234439600 111.8G 83 Linux并重新添加驱动器到btrfs卷。我立刻又得到了同样的写错误(注意2176 = 2048 + 128):
sd 13:0:0:0: [sdd] Invalid command failure
sd 13:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
sd 13:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
sd 13:0:0:0: [sdd] Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
sd 13:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Write(10): 2a 08 00 00 08 80 00 00 08 00
end_request: critical target error, dev sdd, sector 2176
BTRFS: lost page write due to I/O error on /dev/sdd1
BTRFS: bdev /dev/sdd1 errs: wr 12253, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0难道128和2176两个部门都是坏的吗?好吧,我已经重新运行了badblocks /dev/sdd (同样,它没有报告任何坏块),并将分区推远了:
# fdisk -l /dev/sdd
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdd1 4096 234441647 234437552 111.8G 83 Linux并重新创建btrfs卷。同样,“坏块”在同一个魔法区(4224 = 4096 + 128):
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Invalid command failure
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Write(10): 2a 08 00 00 10 80 00 00 08 00
end_request: critical target error, dev sdd, sector 4224
BTRFS: lost page write due to I/O error on /dev/sdd1
BTRFS: bdev /dev/sdd1 errs: wr 124433, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0我不相信巧合,也就是说,在魔术128和128之后,没有其他领域会失败,但具体的一个是有问题的。
什么是可以的?对我来说,这听起来像是内核中的一个bug。
更多信息:
/dev/sdd通过SATA适配器JMicron连接(ID 152 d:0567,看看它是什么样子):dmesg:
sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access JMicron Generic 0116 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 0
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] 234441648 512-byte logical blocks: (120 GB/111 GiB)
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Write Protect is off
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Mode Sense: 47 00 10 08
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and FUA
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Attached SCSI disk发布于 2015-10-20 17:17:39
看来我找到了问题的根源。它确实与JMicron SATA桥连接,参见外部USB3 3磁盘出现“cdb中的无效字段”失败“。修复 with 提交bf5c4136fa5ce471bdbf4cf59a813e32755fd 014包含在内核v3.18.6中,于2015-02-06发布.我试过以下几种内核:
实际的修复被提交为9fa62b1a31c96715 aef34f25000e882ed4ac4876,并在内核4.4.x中可用。
用于工作内核v4.4.x的dmesg如下所示:
scsi host7: uas
scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access JMicron Generic 0116 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] 234441648 512-byte logical blocks: (120 GB/111 GiB)
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] 4096-byte physical blocks
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 53 00 10 08
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Disabling FUA
sd 7:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUAhttps://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/237204
复制相似问题