blocks|key|5699566|text|我是当前的nginx用户和以前的lighttpd用户，我只能回应稳定性问题。此外，nginx具有活跃的开发功能，并且经常会看到每隔几周发布一次新版本，提供新特性或小bug修复。一旦您学习了nginx方法，配置文件也是非常清晰和强大的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I'm a current nginx user and previous lighttpd user and I can only echo the stability issue. Furthermore nginx has active development and often sees a new version released every couple of weeks with new features or minor bug fixes. The configuration file is also quite clear and very powerful once you learn the nginx way of doing things.

blocks|key|3700514|text|Nginx也可以用作负载均衡器(但如果您不需要SSL，haproxy在这方面可能会更好一些)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3700515|Nginx也可以用作SSL反向代理，如果您在多个虚拟主机上使用SSL，这是非常巨大的。这可能是nginx+Netcraft号码的最大原因，nginx的作者在最近的一次采访中说，他认为这是大多数部署的原因。这就是为什么我开始使用它..。然后，我对我所看到的业绩的提高感到震惊:)|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

Nginx can also be used as a load balancer (although haproxy is probably a little better at this if you don't need SSL).

Nginx can also be used as an SSL reverse-proxy, which is huge if you use SSL on multiple virtual hosts. This is probably the single biggest reason for nginx Netcraft numbers and nginx author said in a recent interview he thought this was the reason for a majority of deployments. It's certainly why I started using it... and then was shocked at the performance gains I was seeing :)

blocks|key|3700470|text|最近，我在同一台服务器上对lighttpd和nginx进行了并行评估，为我正在进行的一个新项目做了评估。在我的测试中，Nginx的表现略好于Lighttpd，因此我们将nginx投入生产。关于nginx的FWIW报告比在面向外的web服务器上使用得广泛得多：http://news.netcraft.com/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://news.netcraft.com/^0|3L|P|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

I recently did a side by side evaluation of lighttpd and nginx on the same server for a new project I am working on. Nginx performed slightly better than Lighttpd in my tests, and we have put nginx into production as a result. FWIW Netcraft reports about nginx is much more widely used than lighttpd on outward facing web servers:
<a href="http://news.netcraft.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://news.netcraft.com/</a>

blocks|key|5699730|text|我正在使用两者，nginx和lighttpd非常成功地在一个>500+K点击率/天网站。Lighttpd+(核心)内存泄漏肯定是个神话，我在这段时间里没有遇到任何问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5699731|Nginx很棒。配置简单，内存和cpu占用空间小，即使有大量的流量，闪电速度也非常稳定。|5699732|在我们的示例中，nginx正在执行反向代理缓存、负载平衡和url重写，而lighttpd+%2B+spawncgi+%2B+php作为后端服务器执行脚本时非常方便。|5699733|我还没有很好地测试nginx的快速how接口，所以我不能说它的工作效果有多好。用于静态文件的php%2B+nginx可以取代lighttpd|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

I am using both, nginx and lighttpd very successfully on a >500k hits/day website.
Lighttpd (core) memory leaks must be a myth, I didnt experience any problems in all this time.

Nginx is great. Simple configuration, small memory and cpu footprint even with a lot of traffic, lightning fast and very stable.

In our case nginx is doing the reverse proxy caching, load balancing and url rewrites while lighttpd + spawncgi + php comes in handy as backend server doing the script execution.

I haven't tested the fastcgi interface of nginx very much yet, so I cannot say how good this works. php-fpm + nginx for static files could replace lighttpd

blocks|key|3700351|text|在这两个页面上都找到了VS页面，这里有一个小片段：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3700352|“稳定性|3700353|截至2009年8月，lighttpd仍有3年前报告的未解决的内存泄漏问题。Lighty的一个问题是它像筛子一样漏出记忆。我审计了一会儿就放弃了，这真是一团糟。我会避开它，如果你把大量的交通投入其中，它很快就会毁了你的一天。“|3700354|来源：http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx|offset|length|3700355|老实说，我还没有使用过nginx，所以我不能从经验中说话。我主要是在我的web服务器上使用apache，但我在家里有一个使用lighttpd的。它只提供一个很小的html页面，并且只能通过VPN访问，所以当有人远程进入时，它更像是一个信息门户。|3700356|当我下一次低下头开始尝试新的和更新的服务器端应用程序时，我可能会使用nginx。最后，这是你自己的选择，但取决于它是否将是一个生产环境，我会研究这两个之前承诺。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx^0|0|0|0|3|18|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$H|Y|I|Z|1|10]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|N|$O|$5|P|Q|R|A|$S|T]]]]

Found a VS page on the both, here is a little snip:

"Stability

As of August 2009, lighttpd still has unsolved memory leaks issues reported 3 years ago. One problem with Lighty is that it leaks memory like a sieve. I audited it for a little bit and I gave up, it's a mess. I'd steer clear of it, it will quickly ruin your day if you throw a lot of traffic at it."

Source: <a href="http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx</a>

Honestly, I haven't used nginx so I cannot speak from experience. I primarily used apache on my web server, but I have one at home which uses lighttpd. It only serves a small html only page and is only accessible by VPN, so it's more of an information portal when someone remote's in. 

When I next get my head down and start experimenting with new and updated server side apps, I'll probably play with nginx. At the end of the day, it's your own choice, but depending if its going to be for a production environment, I would research both before committing to either.

blocks|key|3700646|text|我对lighttpd不太了解，但是从下面的链接中我了解到，lighttpd是以单个线程的形式运行的，而nginx使用的是主进程和多个工作进程。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3700647|http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx|offset|length|3700648|Lighttpd以具有单线程和非阻塞I/O的单个进程.的形式运行。nginx作为一个主流程工作，但将其工作委托给工作流程。|blockquote|3700649|因此，这使得nginx更适合于利用多核系统，目前几乎所有的设备都有多核。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2007/04/05/the-lighttpd-web-server.html^0|0|0|18|0|0|9|I|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$D|U|E|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|X|8|@]|9|@$D|Y|E|Z|1|10]]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|C]]|Q|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|R]]]]

I dont know much about lighttpd but reading from the below link, I learned that lighttpd runs as a single process with a single thread whereas nginx makes use of master and multiple worker processes.
<a href="http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Lighttpd_vs_nginx</a>
<blockquote>
Lighttpd runs as <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2007/04/05/the-lighttpd-web-server.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a single process with a single thread and non-blocking I/O</a>.
nginx works as one master process but delegates its work unto worker processes.
</blockquote>
So this makes nginx better suited to take advantage of multiple core systems, nowadays almost all the devices ship with multiple cores.

I'd like to use Lighttpd in production for serving Django apps but i see that these days Nginx is more and more popular. Why is that? I'm aware that in the past Lighttpd had memory leaks but isn't this fixed now? They do have active developers that fix this kind of things don't they? 
Is there any reason i should go with Nginx instead of Lighty? I know that nginx is a great server but is it really that good and better than lighty?

Why is Nginx more popular than lighttpd?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我想在生产中使用Lighttpd为Django应用提供服务，但我发现Nginx现在越来越受欢迎。为什么会这样呢？我知道在过去，Lighttpd有内存泄漏，但现在不是已经解决了吗？他们确实有活跃的开发人员来解决这类问题，不是吗？有什么理由我应该和Nginx而不是Lighty一起去吗？我知道nginx是一个很棒的服务器，但它真的比lighty好吗？

问为什么Nginx比lighttpd更受欢迎？
EN

回答 6

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问为什么Nginx比lighttpd更受欢迎？EN

回答 6

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问为什么Nginx比lighttpd更受欢迎？
EN