blocks|key|771039|text|我们有两个戴尔等格逻辑PS6000。一个是我们的主人SAN复制到另一个单位在另一个部分的建筑。特别是与Citrix+XenServer+(卷创建、快照、瘦配置、Desaster-恢复)的集成吸引了我们的兴趣。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|771040|这些都是很不错的硬件。您可以获得双电源，双控制器(固件升级而不停机！)，每个控制器有4千兆以太网连接，一个基于get平台的独立管理，SNMP，复制，堆栈(多达12？单位，不需要是相同的型号)，SATA，SAS或SSD驱动器(热交换)，不同的RAID级别(包括RAID6)+.|771041|我们的服务计划是24x7x4，这些设备有一个家庭电话功能(可以关闭)，提醒戴尔/Equallogic，以防驱动器出现故障。|771042|只有缺点(除了价格)，我们遇到的快照没有被复制从一个单位到另一个。除此之外，我们对性能、可靠性和可用性都非常满意。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

We have two Dell Equallogic PS6000. One is our master SAN replicating to another unit in a different part of the building.
Especially the integration with Citrix XenServer (Volume creation, snapshots, Thin-Provisioning, Desaster-Recovery) caught our interest.

Those are very nice pieces of hardware. You get dual power-supplies, dual-controllers (firmware upgrades without downtime!), each controller has 4 gigabit Ethernet connections, a webbased platform-independent management, SNMP, replication, stackability (up to twelve? units, doesn't need to be the same models), SATA, SAS or SSD drives (hot-swappable), different RAID-levels (including RAID6) ...

Our service-plan is 24x7x4 and the units have a phone-home feature (which can be turned off), which alerts Dell/Equallogic in case a drive is failing.

Only drawback (apart from the price) which we encountered is snapshots not being replicated from one unit to another. Other than that, we are extremely satisfied with performance, reliability and usability.

blocks|key|770803|text|我ve+tested+FreeNAS+and+Open-E.+Now+I正在使用StarWind。我对他们的产品和服务非常满意。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0|1|Z^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@$9|H|A|I|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]]|F|$]]

I<code>ve tested FreeNAS and Open-E. Now I</code>m using StarWind. I'm fully satisfied with their product and service.

blocks|key|770854|text|如果你想支付手动$60+-使用Openfiler。我的存储器是<2TB，所以我使用StarWind免费。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

If you want to pay for manual $60 - use Openfiler. My storage is &lt;2TB, so I`m using StarWind Free.

blocks|key|4872849|text|我们现在有：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4872850|P4500+(2个节点)|unordered-list-item|4872851|NetApp+FAS270c+(惠普左岸取代的)|4872852|考虑到FalconStor、Compellent、HP+Eva、EMC和更大的NetApp之后，Lefthand做了大部分NetApp/EMC所做的事情，但价格只有NetApp/EMC的一半。我们想要什么好的‘企业’级的24×7，4小时的响应支持，当它击中风扇，所以这就排除了大部分免费/低成本的解决方案。|4872853|如果您不知道使用iSCSI的缺点，则VMWare不支持ESX/vSphere下iSCSI/NFS存储上的MicroSoft集群服务。这种情况今后可能会改变。当我们考虑将SQL+Server集群到VMWare/Lefthand时，这是一个令人沮丧的问题。|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

We've currently got:

<ul>
<li>HP Lefthand P4500 (2 nodes)</li>
<li>NetApp FAS270c (which the HP Lefthand
replaced)</li>
</ul>

Looked at FalconStor, Compellent, HP Eva, EMC and a bigger NetApp before going for the Lefthand, which did most of what the NetApp/EMC did but at half the price. We wanted something with good 'enterprise' grade 24x7 4 hour response support for when it hit the fan so this ruled most of the freebies/low cost solutions out.

A drawback of using iSCSI if you're not aware of it, VMWare do not support MicroSoft Clustering Services on iSCSI/NFS storage under ESX/vSphere. This may change in the future. This was a bummer as we were looking at clustering our SQL Server's on to VMWare/Lefthand.

blocks|key|4872908|text|我们使用HPMSA2012I，存储大约2TB的数据和大量VM图像。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4872909|可怕的单元，我们除了麻烦什么都没有，包括安装了所需固件升级后的1000+GB数据丢失(必须聘请顾问来修复它，但我们没有得到我们的数据)。|4872910|回想起来，我会更好地得到像FreeNAS这样的服务，在一个非常冗余的RAID中有很多商品硬盘驱动器。|4872911|我对戴尔的Equallogic产品印象深刻，但不幸的是，它们超出了我们的预算，尤其是因为我们已经在MSA上浪费了1万美元。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

We use an HP MSA 2012i, storing roughly 2TB of data and lots VM images.

Horrible unit, we've had nothing but trouble, including 100s of GB of data loss after installing a required firmware upgrade (had to hire a consultant to fix it, but we didn't get our data back). 

In retrospect I would have been better served by something like FreeNAS, and lots of commodity hard drives in a very redundant RAID.

I have been impressed by Dell's Equallogic offerings but they are unfortunately over our budget, especially since we've already thrown away $10,000 on the MSA.

blocks|key|770763|text|为什么您在标题中有iSCSI，您只对iSCSI解决方案感兴趣，因为SAN可以包含更多的内容。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|770764|我是一个有点极客，并使用了HDS盒和他们的惠普XP设备，惠普EVA广泛，惠普MSA相当多(喜欢他们的新的‘’ish+2000+few+G2型号btw)，一些NetApps和奇怪的电磁兼容盒。此外，它还与Openfiler和LeftHand一起工作过。|770765|这一切都取决于你需要实现什么，以及你有什么支持资源。如果你需要接近100%25的可用性或负载下的最佳性能，那么我认为很难击败顶级FC盒，当然这些都需要一些相当专业的技能，而且不会便宜。如果你想得到最好的结果，那么一些基于软件/VM的解决方案是无法击败的，它们既便宜又快速，但不像其他的那样可靠。对大多数人来说，妥协是完全足够的，在这种情况下，EVA或NetApps不会真的出错(如果空间/电源/现金预算低的话，MSA是有用的)。大多数拥有丰富经验的人自然会倾向于一个或另一个模型，我也不例外，我也喜欢EVA，因为它们足够快，而且非常简单，确实可以管理。|770766|祝你好运。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

Why have you got iSCSI in the title, are you only interested in iSCSI solutions as SAN can encompass more than just that.

I'm a bit of a storage geek and have used HDS boxes and their HP XP equivilants, HP EVA extensively, HP MSAs quite a lot (love their new'ish 2000fc G2 model btw), a few NetApps and the odd EMC box. Also worked a bit with Openfiler and LeftHand too.

It all comes down to what you need to achieve and what support resources you have available. If you need as close to 100% availability or the best performance under load then I think it's hard to beat top-end FC boxes, of course these need some fairly specialist skills and don't come cheap. If you're after the best bang for the buck then some of these software/VM based solutions can't be beat, they're cheap and fast but not as reliable as others. For most a compromise is perfectly adequate and in that case you can't really go wrong with EVAs or NetApps (with MSAs useful if the space/power/cash budget is low). Most people with a sensible amount of experience will naturally lean towards one model or another, I'm no exception and like EVAs as they're plenty fast enough and very simple to manage indeed.

Best of luck.

blocks|key|770782|text|用于测试存储，主要是使用tgtd的RHEL5.4+5.4|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|770783|生产-+NetApp和Dell+MD3000i|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

for test storage mostly RHEL5.4 with tgtd

for production - NetApp and Dell MD3000i

blocks|key|4872716|text|主要是在我们的核心服务中使用了价格有点昂贵的Compellent解决方案，包括FC和iSCSI，以及一些老的MSA1000‘S在我们的生产巨无霸中用于一些集群服务。正在为我们的生产环境寻找一些其他的SANS。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4872717|强制有一些好的特点，如基于层的存储，卷三角复制，“手机主页”，控制器发送其所有配置和raid阵列配置到副导频(强制支持)，作为一种安全措施，在控制器故障。ans为从副驾驶员到您的控制器登录并为您执行操作和健康检查的支持人员提供隧道安全。|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

Were mainly using a somewhat expensive Compellent SAN solution with both FC and iSCSI for our core services, and some old MSA 1000's in our production colosites for some cluster services. Were looking at some other SANS for our production enviroments tough.

Compellent got some nice features as Tier based storage, volume delta replication, "Phone Home" where the controller sends all its config and raid array config to co-pilot(compellent support) as a security measure in case of controller failure. ans secure tunneling for the support personell from co-pilot to login to your controller and perform actions for you and healthchecks n stuffs.

blocks|key|4872784|text|我用了Openfiler。在收到Openfiler的错误后不久，我意识到我应该选择另一个iSCSI，结果失败了：)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I used Openfiler. Soon after year of receiving errors from Openfiler, I realized that I should choose another iSCSI, and it Failed Fatally:)

blocks|key|770976|text|我们已经成功地使用了各种NetApp文件器来托管iSCSI+LUN。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

We've had success using a variety of NetApp filers to host iSCSI LUNs.

I want to know what SAN solutions do the most people use. 

It can be something preconfigured from storage vendors (EMC CLARiiON, HP EVA, HP Modular Smart Array) or custom-built systems running OpenFiler, NexentaStor, OpenSolaris Storage, StarWind Server, etc.

Thanks in advance.

What do you use for your SAN (iSCSI)?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我想知道大多数人使用什么SAN解决方案。它可以是由存储供应商(EMC、CLARiiON、HP、HP模块智能阵列)预先配置的，也可以是自定义的运行OpenFiler、NexentaStor、OpenSolaris存储、StarWind服务器等的系统。提前谢谢。

问您的SAN (iSCSI)使用什么？
EN

回答 10

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问您的SAN (iSCSI)使用什么？EN

回答 10

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问您的SAN (iSCSI)使用什么？
EN