blocks|key|4184005|text|你可能知道，最大的玩家是赛门铁克企业库。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4184006|这是比较在它和米莫萨之间。|4184007|有一个由十个电子邮件存档产品组成的比较评论，可能会给你一些线索。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.symantec.com/business/enterprise-vault|1|http://www.arconi.com/White-Papers/ev-v-mimosa.html|2|http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi?pagetosend=/export/home/httpd/htdocs/reviews/2008/120808-email-archive-test.html^0|C|7|0|0|2|2|1|0|H|4|2^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$A|11|B|12|1|13]]|C|$]]]|H|$I|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|N]]|O|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|P]]|Q|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|R]]]]

As you probably know, the biggest player is <a href="http://www.symantec.com/business/enterprise-vault" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Symantec Enterprise Vault</a>.

Here's <a href="http://www.arconi.com/White-Papers/ev-v-mimosa.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a comparison</a> between it and Mimosa.

There's a <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi?pagetosend=/export/home/httpd/htdocs/reviews/2008/120808-email-archive-test.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">comparative review here</a> of ten email archiving products which might give you some leads.

blocks|key|444429|text|我总是推荐GFI+MailArchiver+(http://www.gfi.com/mailarchiver/)。我从2006年起就一直在使用它。再快乐不过了。老实说，对于那些需要管理交换服务器以获得归档解决方案的人来说，这是一个梦想。这使得服务器端的管理变得非常容易。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|444430|MailArrchiver是一个基于ASP.net的基于web的系统，后台使用SQL+.您不需要在Exchange服务器端更改任何内容，只需要在邮件存储上启用日记，并实时保存电子邮件。|444431|它还有一个大容量导入工具，可以帮助存档现有邮箱，还有一个批量导出工具可以从归档器下载电子邮件。它还内置了审计功能。|444432|最重要的是，它很便宜。|444433|希望这能帮上忙。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.gfi.com/mailarchiver/^0|N|W|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|C|$Q|R]]]]

I always recommend GFI MailArchiver (<a href="http://www.gfi.com/mailarchiver/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.gfi.com/mailarchiver/</a>). I have been using it since 2006. Couldn't be happier. To be honest, it's a dream to whoever needs to manage the exchange server for having an archive solution. It makes so much easier managing on the server side.

The MailArrchiver is a web-based system built on ASP.net with using SQL at the back. You don't need to change anything on Exchange server side, only enable the journal on the mail storage and it archives emails on the fly in the real time.

It also has bulk import tool that helps to archive the existing mail boxes and a bulk export tool to download the emails from the archiver. It also has audit built right in.

Most of all, it's inexpensive. 

Hope that helps.

blocks|key|444705|text|Exchange+2010已经内置了企业版的存档。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

Exchange 2010 has built-in Archiving in the enterprise version.

blocks|key|444506|text|看看邮件档案|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.mailarchiva.com/^0|2|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

take a look at <a href="http://www.mailarchiva.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">mailarchivia</a>

blocks|key|444522|text|我推荐梭鱼的讯息存档器。它能完成任务。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.barracudanetworks.com/ns/products/archiver-features.php^0|6|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

I recommend Barracuda's <a href="http://www.barracudanetworks.com/ns/products/archiver-features.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Message Archiver</a>. It does the job.

blocks|key|4184235|text|您可能还想看看交换服务器存档器|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4184236|免责声明:我在红门工作，尽管在其他部门工作。但作为一名测试人员，我没有任何营销方面的话:)|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.red-gate.com/products/Exchange/index.htm^0|7|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|F|$G|$5|H|I|J|C|$K|L]]]]

You might also like to take a look at <a href="http://www.red-gate.com/products/Exchange/index.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Exchange Server Archiver</a>

Disclaimer: I work at Red Gate, albeit in one of the other divisions. But as a tester, so no marketing talk from me :)

blocks|key|444614|text|看看EMC的SourceOne产品(+http://www.emc.com/products/launch/sourceone/index.htm+)。请注意，我是EMC的员工，所以这可能被看作是一个无耻的插头。然而，作为EMC的一名员工，我在过去的三年里一直使用这个产品进行电子邮件归档。效果很好！我们几乎都有无限的邮箱，新版本已经被完全重新设计成更加灵活和可伸缩的架构。设计人员还在这个版本中为eDiscovery添加了新的添加模块，add将在未来发布新的功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.emc.com/products/launch/sourceone/index.htm^0|J|1I|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

Have a look at EMC's SourceOne Product ( <a href="http://www.emc.com/products/launch/sourceone/index.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.emc.com/products/launch/sourceone/index.htm</a> ). Note, I am an EMC employee so this might be viewed as a shameless plug. However, as an EMC Employee, I have used this product for our email archiving for the past 3 years. It has worked great! We all have virtually unlimited mailboxs and the new version has been completely redesigned to be more flexible and scalable architecture. The designers have also added new add on modules to this release for eDiscovery and add will be releasing new features in the future.

blocks|key|444664|text|这是快速和肮脏，但它确实工作。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|444665|我已经在Exchange+2003中这样做了，所以我只能假设2007也可以。在2003年的邮件商店中有一个选项：“存档该商店中邮箱发送或接收的所有邮件”，您可以在其中指定一个电子邮件地址，Exchange将向该地址发送所有电子邮件的副本。|444666|然后将hMailServer放在只有您可以访问的专用框中。由于法律原因，你现在有一份所有电子邮件的副本。备份这个盒子，你就都准备好了。您可以使用IMAP客户端访问它。|444667|最好的一点是，如果您使用现有的硬件作为hMailServer，因为它是免费的，那么成本可以是零的。|444668|在所有当前邮箱上做一个ExMerge，这样您就可以快速地了解每个人的现状，然后从现在开始对所有事情进行hMailServer。|444669|并不能解决商店的大小问题，但这并不能解决这个问题。|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$]]

This is quick and dirty but it does work.

I have done this in Exchange 2003 so I can only assume 2007 can do it as well. There is an option on the mailstore in 2003 to "Archive all message sent or received by mailboxes on this store" You specify an email address in there and Exchange will send a copy of all email to that address.

Then put hMailServer on a dedicated box that only you have access to. You now have a copy of all email for the legal reasons. Backup this box and you're all set. You access it using an IMAP client.

Best part is the cost can be nothing if you use existing hardware for the hMailServer since it's free

Do an ExMerge on all the current mailboxes and that gives you a quick snapshot of everyone as they are and then hMailServer for everything from this point on.

Does nothing to address the size of the store but thats not what it's solving.

blocks|key|444681|text|稍微不同的方法，但我们有我们的档案处理的米米卡斯特，除了AV和垃圾邮件过滤。我对此很满意，但这和很多普通的嫌疑人有点不同，因为这一切都是在场外处理的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://mimecast.com/^0|K|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

Slightly different approach but we have our archiving handled by <a href="http://mimecast.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mimecast</a>, in addition to AV and Spam filtering. I'm very happy with it - but it's a little different from a lot of the usual suspects because it's all handled offsite.

blocks|key|4184030|text|如果您的公司有一个文档管理系统，请考虑将您的电子邮件归档与DMS集成。聚合电子邮件和其他文档的能力将使电子邮件存档和文档存储库变得更有价值。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

If you have a document management system in your company consider integration between your e-mail archive and the DMS. The ability to aggregate e-mail and the rest of your documents will make both the e-mail archive and the document repository much more valuable.

blocks|key|4184072|text|几年前，我做了一些关于EMC选项的研究/培训，SourceOne+(prev+)。我不能推荐它(因为我只在实验室环境中使用它)，但是特性是匹配的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.emc.com/products/family/emc-sourceone-family.htm^0|N|9|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

A couple of years ago I did some study/training on EMC's option, <a href="http://www.emc.com/products/family/emc-sourceone-family.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SourceOne</a> (prev emailxtender). I can't recommend it (since I only used it in a lab environment), but the features match up.

blocks|key|4184171|text|我使用过赛门铁克电动车，但我不太喜欢它；我担心，这是对赛门铁克产品的普遍反感，而不是出于任何合理的理由。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4184172|我通常倾向于回避电子邮件存档产品，有很多原因。首先，人们总是可以看到更好的邮箱管理策略。其次，我质疑像我们在这里讨论的重要信息是否应该首先驻留在电子邮件系统中。这样看吧:如果有人在休假，而一位重要的医生潜伏在他们的电子邮件中，你需要做些什么，你会乐意这样做吗？最后，检查您的数据保留立法-它可能是电子邮件的所有者是谁创造它，即原始发件人。如果是这样的话，那二十多人没有理由保留。换句话说，我认为归档是将问题转移到其他地方。|4184173|用户教育是最好的方法；让他们习惯于删除他们不需要保存的电子邮件，保存文件系统的附件，等等。让他们明白这些文件不是他们自己的个人财产，他们属于公司。我的经验是，就电子邮件而言，人们往往是囤积者，一旦你解决了这个问题，你可能会发现问题是自己解决的(这样做可以节省很多钱！)|4184174|如果，也只有当你做完所有的电子邮件量问题之后，才是考虑归档的时候。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

I've used Symantec EV and don't like it too much; a general antipathy towards Symantec products rather than for any sensible reason I'm afraid.

I generally tend to shy away from email archiving products for a number of reasons. Firstly, one can always look at better mailbox management policies. Secondly, I question if important info such as we're talking about here should really reside in the email system in the first place. Look at it this way: if somebody was on leave and an important doc was lurking in their email, what would need to be done and would you be happy doing it? Finally, check your data retention legislation - it may be the case that for email the owner of a record is the person who creates it, i.e. the original sender. If this is the case, the 20 odd people who have received it have no grounds for keeping it. In other words, I view archiving as moving the problem elsewhere.

User education is the best approach; get them in the habit of deleting emails that they don't need to keep, saving attachments to the file system, and so on. Have them understand that these documents aren't their own personal property, they belong to the company. My experience is that people tend to be hoarders so far as email is concerned, and once you get that sorted out you may find that the problem goes away on it's own (and saves a lot of money in doing so!)

If, and only if, after having done all that you still have email volume problems, then is the time to consider archiving.

blocks|key|4184338|text|我使用了来自S的exchange@PAM，它对我们非常有用。这是比较便宜的，也许没有赛门铁克的所有额外功能，但它一直为我们工作。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.hs-soft.com/products/email-archiving/en/email-archiving.aspx^0|6|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

I've using exchange@PAM from <a href="http://www.hs-soft.com/products/email-archiving/en/email-archiving.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">H&amp;S</a> and it's been working great for us. It's less expensive and may not have all the extra features of Symantec's offering, but it's been working great for us.

blocks|key|4184401|text|红门的交换服务器存档器是伟大的，如果你想要真正透明的电子邮件存档。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.red-gate.com/products/Exchange/index.htm^0|3|8|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

Red Gate's <a href="http://www.red-gate.com/products/Exchange/index.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Exchange Server Archiver</a> is great if you want truly transparent email archiving.

We're looking into a solution to do email archiving and near-line backup of our Exchange Server 2007 environment. 

We currently have about 200 mailboxes and the Mailstore is approx 150 GB. We need to be able to archive email for several years for legal purposes, and would like the archiving solution to also help with expediting restores of deleted messages if possible. Our System Support consultants have recommended Mimosa.

Anybody have experience with Mimosa, or other products in this market space?

Email Archiving in an Exchange Environment

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我们正在研究一种解决方案，用于对Exchange 2007环境进行电子邮件归档和近线备份。我们目前有大约200个邮箱，邮件商店大约有150 GB。我们需要能够存档电子邮件数年的法律目的，并希望存档解决方案也有助于加快恢复删除的消息如果可能。我们的系统支持顾问推荐了Mimosa。谁有在这个市场上使用米莫萨或其他产品的经验？

问交换环境下的电子邮件存档
EN

回答 14

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问交换环境下的电子邮件存档EN

回答 14

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问交换环境下的电子邮件存档
EN