我试图在mysql中构建一个索引,以支持键集分页查询。我的查询如下:
SELECT * FROM invoice
WHERE company_id = 'someguid'
AND id > 'lastguidfromlastpage'
ORDER BY id
LIMIT 10这方面的常识是,company_id上的索引将包含表的主键(id)。因此,我希望能够直接使用索引中的行,而不需要查询首先排序结果,但是,我的解释计划显示了一个文件和一个索引合并:
mysql> explain SELECT *
-> FROM invoice
-> WHERE company_id = '37687714-2e9d-4daa-aee6-f7d56962f903'
-> AND id > '525ae038-0cc3-4f9a-85e6-6f36d43fae40'
-> ORDER BY id
-> LIMIT 10;
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | invoice | NULL | index_merge | PRIMARY,invoice__company_id | invoice__company_id,PRIMARY | 76,38 | NULL | 48 | 100.00 | Using intersect(invoice__company_id,PRIMARY); Using where; Using filesort |
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)如果我显式地将id添加到索引中,那么我就得到了我期望的解释计划:
mysql> explain SELECT *
-> FROM invoice
-> WHERE company_id = '37687714-2e9d-4daa-aee6-f7d56962f903'
-> AND id > '525ae038-0cc3-4f9a-85e6-6f36d43fae40'
-> ORDER BY id
-> LIMIT 10;
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+-----------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+-----------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | invoice | NULL | range | PRIMARY,invoice__company_id_id | invoice__company_id_id,PRIMARY | 76 | NULL | 98 | 100.00 | Using index condition |
+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+---------+------+------+----------+-----------------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)显示创建表:
CREATE TABLE `invoice` (
`id` varchar(36) NOT NULL,
`company_id` varchar(36) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`invoice_number` varchar(36) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`identifier` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`created_on` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
`created_by` varchar(36) DEFAULT NULL,
`data_source` varchar(36) NOT NULL,
`type` varchar(45) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `invoice__company_id_id` (`company_id`,`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1选择@@optimizer_switch;
use_index_extensions=onMySQL版本:
显示像‘char%’这样的变量;
character_set_client utf8
character_set_connection utf8
character_set_database latin1
character_set_filesystem binary
character_set_results utf8
character_set_server latin1
character_set_system utf8
character_sets_dir /usr/share/mysql/charsets/有几个来源解释说,company_id索引本身就足以满足这一要求:
我一直无法找到官方文件,确切地说是什么期望。这与id的数据类型有关吗?关于mysql+innodb行为的常识是否不正确?
发布于 2020-08-20 23:29:32
我以前也遇到过这个问题。这是我对它的分析。
虽然理论上2列索引与InnoDB的一列索引相同(假设id是PK`‘),但在某些情况下,优化器似乎忽略了这一事实。
此外,当我看到需要时,我喜欢显式地添加PK。这表明模式的未来读者(包括我自己)从附加的PK中获得了一些查询的好处。
我还没有找到“索引合并相交”比等效的复合索引更快的情况。
我不喜欢使用索引“提示”,因为我担心将来数据分布会改变,而我的“提示”会使事情变得更糟。
发布于 2020-08-20 14:00:36
这不管用。
要使keyset分页生效,您需要使用自动增量整数作为主id/key。现在您正在使用VARCHAR和存储UID。
您的查询不会选择"next“UID大于”(... AND id > '525ae038-0cc3-4f9a-85e6-6f36d43fae40' ... )。
当您将主ID更改为number时,这将有效。如果索引仍然存在问题,可以尝试强制mysql使用您的索引:
SELECT * FROM invoice USE INDEX (invoice__company_id_id)
WHERE company_id = 'someguid'
AND id > 12345
ORDER BY id
LIMIT 10https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57223858
复制相似问题