我有很多意识到的提升功能:
const chain = f => xs =>
xs.reduce((acc, x) => acc.concat(f(x)), []);
const of = x => [x];
const add = (x, y) => x + y;
const liftM2 = (chain, of) => f => m1 => m2 =>
chain(x => chain(y => of(f(x, y))) (m2)) (m1);
console.log(liftM2(chain, of) (add) ([2]) ([3])); // [5]
是否有可能实现相应的泛型提升功能?
const liftM = (chain, of) => f => (...ms) => ...我想这是一种递归算法,但我不能把我的头脑围绕在它上面。
发布于 2019-03-05 21:04:14
是的,您可以在ms上递归地这样做,但我想折叠更适合:
const lift = (chain, of) => f => (...ms) =>
ms.reduceRight((acc, m) =>
(...xs) => chain(x => acc(...xs, x))(m)
, (...xs) => of(f(...xs))
)()发布于 2019-03-06 13:51:59
这是递归程序,以防你还对它感兴趣-
const chain = f => xs =>
xs .reduce
( (acc, x) => acc .concat (f (x))
, []
)
const of = x =>
[ x ]
const add = (x, ...xs) =>
x === undefined
? 0
: x + add (...xs)
const lift = (chain, of) => f => (...ms) =>
{ const loop = (xs, [ m, ...rest ]) =>
m === undefined
? of (f (...xs))
: chain (x => loop ([ ...xs, x ], rest)) (m)
return loop ([], ms)
}
const print = (...xs) =>
xs .forEach (x => console .log (JSON .stringify (x)))
print
( lift (chain, of) (add) ()
, lift (chain, of) (add) ([ 1 ])
, lift (chain, of) (add) ([ 1 ], [ 2 ])
, lift (chain, of) (add) ([ 1 ], [ 2 ], [ 3 ])
, lift (chain, of) (add) ([ 1 ], [ 2 ], [ 3 ], [ 4 ])
)
// [ 0 ] [ 1 ] [ 3 ] [ 6 ] [ 10 ]
我们可以修改lift,使其取决于用户提供的函数的独立性,例如这个双参数函数add2 -
const add2 = (x, y) =>
x + y
lift (chain, of) (add2) ([ 1 ]) ([ 2 ])
// [ 3 ]
lift (chain, of) (add2) ([ 1, 1 ]) ([ 2, 2, 2 ])
// [ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]或者这个三参数函数,add3 -
const add3 = (x, y, z) =>
x + y + z
lift (chain, of) (add3) ([ 1 ]) ([ 2 ]) ([ 3 ])
// [ 6 ]
lift (chain, of) (add3) ([ 1, 1 ]) ([ 2, 2, 2 ]) ([ 3, 3, 3, 3 ])
// [ 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6 ]这是实施方案-
const curry = (f, n = f.length) =>
{ const loop = (xs, n) =>
n === 0
? f (...xs)
: x => loop ([ ...xs, x ], n - 1)
return loop ([], n)
}
const lift = (chain, of) => f =>
{ const loop = (xs, [ m, ...rest ]) =>
m === undefined
? of (f (...xs))
: chain (x => loop ([ ...xs, x ], rest)) (m)
return curry
( (...ms) => loop ([], ms)
, f.length
)
}展开下面的代码片段,在自己的浏览器中验证结果-
const chain = f => xs =>
xs .reduce
( (acc, x) => acc .concat (f (x))
, []
)
const of = x =>
[ x ]
const curry = (f, n = f.length) =>
{ const loop = (xs, n) =>
n === 0
? f (...xs)
: x => loop ([ ...xs, x ], n - 1)
return loop ([], n)
}
const lift = (chain, of) => f =>
{ const loop = (xs, [ m, ...rest ]) =>
m === undefined
? of (f (...xs))
: chain (x => loop ([ ...xs, x ], rest)) (m)
return curry ((...ms) => loop ([], ms), f.length)
}
const print = (...xs) =>
xs .forEach (x => console .log (JSON .stringify (x)))
const add2 = (x, y) =>
x + y
const add3 = (x, y, z) =>
x + y + z
print
( lift (chain, of) (add2) ([ 1 ]) ([ 2 ])
, lift (chain, of) (add2) ([ 1, 1 ]) ([ 2, 2, 2 ])
, lift (chain, of) (add3) ([ 1, 1 ]) ([ 2, 2, 2 ]) ([ 3, 3, 3, 3 ])
)
// [ 3 ]
// [ 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 ]
// [ 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6 ]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55010873
复制相似问题