我有以下Fortran代码
type t_octree
integer :: max_num_point
class(t_octree_node), pointer :: root => null()
contains
final :: DESTROY_OCTREE
end type t_octree
type t_octree_node
real :: box(2,3)
integer :: depth
type(t_octree_node), pointer :: parent => null()
type(t_octree_node), pointer :: children(:) => null()
class(t_octree_leaf), pointer :: leaf => null()
contains
final :: CLEAN_NODE
end type t_octree_node
type, extends(t_octree_node) :: t_octree_leaf
integer, allocatable :: id(:)
integer :: num_point
contains
final :: DESTROY_LEAF
end type在我完成了我的处理之后,现在需要确保我的东西被正确的分配了。
在我最后的例行公事中
subroutine DESTROY_OCTREE( this )
implicit none
type(t_octree) :: this
type(t_octree_node), pointer :: node => null()
integer :: i
node => this% root
if( associated(node% leaf) )deallocate( node% leaf )
if(.not. associated(node% children) )RETURN
deallocate( node )
node => this% root
i = 0
nullify(node)
print*, associated(this% root) ! this is true!!
print*, associated(this% root% children) ! this is true!!
end subroutine DESTROY_OCTREE
recursive subroutine CLEAN_NODE ( this )
implicit none
type(t_octree_node) :: this
type(t_octree_node), pointer :: node => null(), next => null()
integer :: i
if( associated(this% leaf) )then
deallocate( this% leaf )
nullify( this% leaf )
endif
if(.not. associated(this% children) )RETURN
do i = 1, 8
node => this% children(i)
deallocate( node )
nullify(node)
! debug
! print*, i, "rec"
enddo
nullify(this% children)
nullify(this% parent)
end subroutine CLEAN_NODE
subroutine DESTROY_LEAF ( leaf )
implicit none
type(t_octree_leaf) :: leaf
deallocate( leaf% id )
end subroutine DESTROY_LEAF在我的主程序中,我执行以下操作
program TEST_OCTREE
use MD_OCTREE
implicit none
type(t_octree), pointer :: octree
octree => t_octree( max_num_point, box )
(...) ! all processing to build the data structure现在我通过简单的
deallocate( octree )
print*, associated(octree% root) ! this give a segmentation fault问题可以解释为什么我的print*, associated(this% root)命令在打印我的主程序时仍然显示TRUE,因为它给了我一个分段错误。
发布于 2018-12-27 22:48:41
取消分配指针会导致与同一目标关联的任何其他指针的指针关联状态变为未定义(F2018 9.7.3.3p2)。这种情况发生在node和this%root过程中--两个指针引用同一个对象(通过指针赋值node => this% root,对象通过node指针被解除分配),这使得this%root具有未定义的关联状态。
关联内部的参数不能是具有未定义关联状态的指针(F2018 16.9.16p3)。代码是不符合的,任何事情都可能发生--其中“任何事情”都相当合理地包括了你所看到的结果。
当您通过node指针释放对象时,没有简单的方法可以让处理器可靠地更新this%root指针的状态--它最终指向的是不再存在的东西。
在显示的源片段中还有其他可疑结构,包括在同一个指针对象上的DEALLOCATE语句之后使用多余的空值(成功地解除分配不关联(无效)指针),在DEALLOCATE可能合适时使用NULLIFY (很难说没有完整的代码),以及使用结构构造函数作为指针目标。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53951210
复制相似问题