我有两个线程thread_1和thread_2在同一个对象unsafeObj上调用不同的方法。
unsafeObj.incrementVAR_v1() 10次unsafeObj.incrementVAR_v2() 10次这两个实例方法都有一个具有不同锁的synchronized-block (LOCK_1和LOCK_2) 访问相同的实例字段VAR。
public void icrementVAR_v1() {
synchronized(LOCK_1) {
++VAR;
print("Thread 1: " + VAR)
}
}
public void incrementVAR_v2() {
synchronized(LOCK_2) {
++VAR;
print("Thread 2: " + VAR);
}
}考虑到这两个synchronized-blocks使用不同的锁,我本来预计VAR会被并发访问,从而导致更新丢失(VAR小于20)。但这不是我所观察到的。有人能给我解释一下为什么不是这样吗?
示例输出:
Thread 2: 2
Thread 1: 1
Thread 2: 3
Thread 1: 4
Thread 2: 5
Thread 1: 6
Thread 2: 7
Thread 1: 8
Thread 2: 9
Thread 1: 10
Thread 2: 11
Thread 1: 12
Thread 2: 13
Thread 1: 14
Thread 2: 15
Thread 1: 16
Thread 2: 17
Thread 1: 18
Thread 2: 19
Thread 1: 20发布于 2018-10-09 09:04:32
正如我所预期的那样,对字段的并发访问(由于有两个不同的锁),VAR 确实会导致一个争用条件,但是为了观察它,需要大量的迭代(在我的例子中,每个线程中有100'000次迭代)。汲取的经验教训:
发布于 2018-10-09 09:24:34
只是为了好玩,在10岁(当然,它没有保证)
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread t1=new Thread(()->{
for(int i=0;i<10;i++){
icrementVAR_v1();
}
}
);
Thread t2=new Thread(()->{
for(int i=0;i<10;i++){
incrementVAR_v2();
}
}
);
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
static Object LOCK_1=new Object();
static Object LOCK_2=new Object();
static int VAR=0;
public static void icrementVAR_v1() {
synchronized(LOCK_1) {
++VAR;
Thread.yield();
System.out.println("Thread 1: " + VAR);
}
}
public static void incrementVAR_v2() {
synchronized(LOCK_2) {
++VAR;
Thread.yield();
System.out.println("Thread 2: " + VAR);
}
}
public static void print(String s){
System.out.println(s);
}
}示例输出:
Thread 1: 2
Thread 2: 2
Thread 1: 4
Thread 2: 5
Thread 1: 6
Thread 2: 7
Thread 1: 8
Thread 2: 9
Thread 1: 10
Thread 1: 11
Thread 2: 12
Thread 1: 13
Thread 2: 14
Thread 1: 15
Thread 2: 16
Thread 1: 17
Thread 2: 18
Thread 1: 19
Thread 2: 19
Thread 2: 20https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52716190
复制相似问题