具有OpenVAS (由PostgreSQL支持)实例,在打开“任务”选项卡时速度较慢。
下面的查询在PostgreSQL中运行22秒。有什么建议可以优化吗?
SELECT id, host,
iso_time (start_time), iso_time (end_time),
current_port, max_port, report,
(SELECT uuid FROM reports WHERE id = report),
(SELECT uuid FROM hosts
WHERE id = (SELECT host FROM host_identifiers
WHERE source_type = 'Report Host'
AND name = 'ip'
AND source_id = (SELECT uuid FROM reports
WHERE id = report)
AND value = report_hosts.host
LIMIT 1)
)
FROM report_hosts
WHERE report = 702;计划是
Index Scan using report_hosts_by_report on report_hosts (cost=0.42..1975570.99 rows=447 width=38) (actual time=50.042..22979.257 rows=1206 loops=1)
Index Cond: (report = 702)
SubPlan 1
-> Index Scan using reports_pkey on reports (cost=0.28..2.49 rows=1 width=37) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=1 loops=1206)
Index Cond: (id = report_hosts.report)
SubPlan 4
-> Index Scan using hosts_pkey on hosts (cost=4414.37..4416.59 rows=1 width=37) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1206)
Index Cond: (id = $4)
InitPlan 3 (returns $4)
-> Limit (cost=2.49..4414.09 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=18.998..18.998 rows=0 loops=1206)
InitPlan 2 (returns $2)
-> Index Scan using reports_pkey on reports reports_1 (cost=0.28..2.49 rows=1 width=37) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=1206)
Index Cond: (id = report_hosts.report)
-> Seq Scan on host_identifiers (cost=0.00..4411.60 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=18.997..18.997 rows=0 loops=1206)
Filter: ((source_type = 'Report Host'::text) AND (name = 'ip'::text) AND (source_id = $2) AND (value = report_hosts.host))
Rows Removed by Filter: 99459
Planning time: 0.531 ms
Execution time: 22979.575 ms发布于 2018-09-26 21:09:57
所有的时间都花在1206个host_identifiers的顺序扫描上。
尝试用联接替换子查询:
SELECT rh.id, rh.host,
iso_time(rh.start_time), iso_time(rh.end_time),
rh.current_port, rh.max_port, rh.report,
r.uuid,
h.uuid
FROM report_hosts AS rh
LEFT JOIN reports AS r
ON rh.report = r.id
LEFT JOIN host_identifiers AS hi
ON hi.source_id = r.uuid
AND hi.value = rh.host
AND hi.source_type = 'Report Host'
AND hi.name = 'ip'
LEFT JOIN hosts AS h
ON h.id = hi.host
WHERE rh.report = 702;这不是完全相同的,因为它没有说明没有LIMIT 1就没有什么意义的ORDER BY,但是它应该接近事实。
适当的索引会使它更快(如果它们还不存在):
reports(id)上host_identifiers(source_id, value)上hosts(id)上您的查询很难阅读,因为您没有用表名对列进行限定。
发布于 2018-09-27 17:23:09
哇!添加索引host_identifiers(source_id, value)正是我想要的:
create INDEX host_identifiers_source_id_value on host_identifiers(source_id, value);“任务”选项卡的页面加载时间从70秒减少到了13秒。
谢谢!
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52525654
复制相似问题