现在,我面临一个我认为可以优化的查询。
select i.itemID,
(select image from imagetable where imageType = 1 and itemID = i.itemID)
(select image from imagetable where imageType = 2 and itemID = i.itemID)
(select image from imagetable where imageType = 5 and itemID = i.itemID)
from
item i
where
i.itemID = 3这是一个需要优化的示例,问题是java将结果作为一行使用。如果我想要包含更多的“图像类型”,我需要包含更多的子查询。
所以问题是,我如何优化这个问题?
发布于 2018-04-20 19:07:48
你的查询应该没问题。它甚至可能是最有效的方法,在imagetable(itemitem, imageType)上建立索引。
规范的替代方案是有条件的聚合:
select i.itemID,
max(case when it.imageType = 1 then it.image end),
max(case when it.imageType = 2 then it.image end),
max(case when it.imageType = 5 then it.image end)
from item i left join
imagetable it
on it.itemId = i.itemId and it.imageType in (1, 2, 5)
where i.itemID = 3
group by i.itemId;发布于 2018-04-20 20:13:10
也许这是:
select i.itemID, t1.image im1, t2.image im2, t5.image im5
from item i
left join imagetable t1 on t1.itemId = i.itemId and t1.imageType=1
left join imagetable t2 on t2.itemId = i.itemId and t1.imageType=2
left join imagetable t5 on t5.itemId = i.itemId and t1.imageType=5
where i.itemID = 3问题是,结果被java作为一行使用
这似乎非常严格,如果您的java接受多行,选择就会简单得多。但如果是这样的话。但是,我不确定它是否比您的选择更有效,我想(不尝试)也是一样的。(前两个子查询的结尾括号后面需要一个逗号)
以下内容也应该可以工作,可能取决于image数据类型:
select i.itemID,
max(decode(imageType,1,image)) im1,
max(decode(imageType,2,image)) im2,
max(decode(imageType,5,image)) im5
from item i left join imagetable t on t.itemId = i.itemId
where i.itemID = 3
group by i.itemID发布于 2018-04-20 19:08:45
select i.itemID,
case when imageType = 1 then image else null end,
case when imageType = 2 then image else null end,
case when imageType = 5 then image else null end
from
item i left join
imagetable t
on t.itemId = i.itemId
where
i.itemID = 3https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49948212
复制相似问题