我有与我的应用程序的独立功能相对应的单台变压器。
在气象模块中
class Monad m => WeatherT m where
byCity :: String -> m WeatherData
newtype MockWeather m a = MockWeather {
...
} deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, MonadTrans)
instance Monad m => WeatherT (MockWeather m) where
...在计数器模块中
class Monad m => CounterT m where
increment :: m Int
current :: m Int
newtype MockCounter m a = MockCounter {
...
} deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, MonadTrans)
instance Monad m => CounterT (MockCounter m) where
...它们可能都有具有不同实现的多个实例,例如,它们都有我在这里使用的一个模拟实例:MockCounter和MockWeather。
在主模块中,我将MyApp monad定义为:
newtype MyAppM m a = MyAppM { unMyAppM :: MockCounter (MockWeather m) a }
deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, CounterT, WeatherT)这个定义要求我使(MockCounter (MockWeather m)成为WeatherT的一个实例。
instance Monad m => WeatherT (MockCounter (MockWeather m))我在主模块中定义了这个实例,因为我不希望天气模块和计数器模块相互依赖。
但是在主模块中定义这个实例使它成为一个Orphan实例。
问题:
CounterT,WeatherT和MyAppM走在正确的轨道上了吗?我想通过组合解耦和可模拟的功能来构建我的应用程序。主模块
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
module Main where
import Counter
import Weather
newtype MyAppM m a = MyAppM { unMyAppM :: MockCounter (MockWeather m) a }
deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, CounterT, WeatherT)
instance Monad m => WeatherT (MockCounter (MockWeather m))
runMyAppM :: Int -> MyAppM m a -> m (a, Int)
runMyAppM i = runMockWeather . (`runMockCounter` i) . unMyAppM
myApp :: (Monad m, CounterT m , WeatherT m) => m String
myApp = do
_ <- increment
(WeatherData weather) <- byCity "Amsterdam"
return weather
-- Testing it:
main :: IO ()
main = runMyAppM 12 myApp >>= print天气模块
{-# LANGUAGE DefaultSignatures #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
module Weather where
import Control.Monad.Trans.Class
import Control.Monad.Trans.Identity
newtype WeatherData = WeatherData String deriving (Show)
class Monad m => WeatherT m where
byCity :: String -> m WeatherData
default byCity :: (MonadTrans t, WeatherT m', m ~ t m') => String -> m WeatherData
byCity = lift . byCity
newtype MockWeather m a = MockWeather {
unMockWeather :: IdentityT m a
} deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, MonadTrans)
runMockWeather :: MockWeather f a -> f a
runMockWeather = runIdentityT . unMockWeather
instance Monad m => WeatherT (MockWeather m) where
byCity city = MockWeather $ return $ WeatherData $ "It is sunny in " ++ city计数器模块
{-# LANGUAGE DefaultSignatures #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}
module Counter where
import Control.Monad.Identity
import Control.Monad.State
import Control.Monad.Trans.Class
class Monad m => CounterT m where
increment :: m Int
current :: m Int
default increment :: (MonadTrans t, CounterT m', m ~ t m') => m Int
increment = lift increment
default current :: (MonadTrans t, CounterT m', m ~ t m') => m Int
current = lift current
newtype MockCounter m a = MockCounter {
unMockCounter :: StateT Int m a
} deriving (Functor, Applicative, Monad, MonadTrans, MonadState Int)
defaultMockCounter :: MockCounter Identity ()
defaultMockCounter = MockCounter $ put 0
runMockCounter :: MockCounter m a -> Int -> m (a, Int)
runMockCounter = runStateT . unMockCounter
instance Monad m => CounterT (MockCounter m) where
increment = MockCounter $ do
c <- get
let n = c + 1
put n
return n
current = MockCounter get发布于 2018-03-07 11:46:12
您需要一个实例WeatherT m => WeatherT (MockCounter m),该实例通过MockCounter m来提升WeatherT m实例,这要归功于MockCounter是一个单台转换器。(您编写的默认方法的要点是定义此类实例。)
为了避免孤立的实例,一种方法是将Weather和Counter分别划分为Class和Trans模块。Class不需要相互依赖,而每个Trans模块可能依赖于所有的Class模块(相反的方式也是可能的,实际上也是mtl如何实现的,但是IMO Trans依赖于Class更好:Class定义接口,Trans定义实现)。
这确实是一个(已知的)问题,因为如果您有n转换器和m类,则可能需要n*m提升实例。一种解决方案是为所有变压器(MonadTrans t, WeatherT m) => WeatherT (t m)定义一个多态重叠实例。重叠的实例经常被拒绝,但我不确定在这种情况下实际存在什么问题。
顺便说一句,按照mtl和transformers的命名约定,我们将有MonadWeather和MonadCounter类,以及WeatherT和CounterT类型(monad )。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49149787
复制相似问题