首页
学习
活动
专区
圈层
工具
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >Junit 5测试类结构

Junit 5测试类结构
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2017-11-29 11:03:40
回答 1查看 576关注 0票数 0

嗨,我是JUnit的初学者,也是测试的新手。可能是过度考虑了,但我想知道测试代码结构的良好实践。我尝试过很少的方法。如有任何建议,我将不胜感激。

第一种方法:将参数、输入、输出放在类的首位。然后很容易检查或更改整个类的测试条件:

代码语言:javascript
复制
@TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
public class App {

    private DecimalRepresentation decimal;

    private final int[] positiveArguments = { 10, 50, 2500 };
    private final int[] negativeArguments = { -10, -50, -2500 };

    @BeforeAll
    void init() {
        decimal = new DecimalRepresentation();
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveBinaryArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "1010"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "110010"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "100111000100"));
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeBinaryArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "11111111111111111111111111110110"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "11111111111111111111111111001110"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "11111111111111111111011000111100"));
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveOctalArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "12"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "62"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "4704"));
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeOctalArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "37777777766"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "37777777716"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "37777773074"));
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveHexArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "A"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "32"),
                Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "9C4"));
    }

    private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeHexArguments() {
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "FFFFFFF6"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "FFFFFFCE"),
                Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "FFFFF63C"));
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(strings = { "0" })
    void shouldReturnZeroIfValueNotSpecified(String zero) {
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toBinary());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toOctal());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toHex());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createPositiveBinaryArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbersBin(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createNegativeBinaryArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbersBin(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createPositiveOctalArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbersOrc(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createNegativeOctalArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbersOct(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createPositiveHexArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbersHex(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("createNegativeHexArguments")
    void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbersHex(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
        decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
        assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
    }
}

我知道我可以直接否定positiveArguments,而不是创建另一个数组,但是我想保持清楚,也许将来我会区分它们。

第二种方法:将每个转换类型组织为嵌套类。阅读有关测试的内容更清楚,但缺点是在检查/更改测试参数的情况下滚动文件/类,因为我不能使用外部类方法源(或不知道如何(?)):

代码语言:javascript
复制
@TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
public class DecimalRepresentationTest {

    private DecimalRepresentation decimal;

    private final int[] positiveArguments = { 10, 50, 2500 };
    private final int[] negativeArguments = { -10, -50, -2500 };

    @BeforeAll
    void init() {
        decimal = new DecimalRepresentation();
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(strings = { "0" })
    void shouldReturnZeroIfValueNotSpecified(String zero) {
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toBinary());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toOctal());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toHex());
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Binary")
    class ToBinaryConversion {

        private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveBinaryArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "1010"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "110010"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "100111000100"));
        }

        private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeBinaryArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "11111111111111111111111111110110"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "11111111111111111111111111001110"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "11111111111111111111011000111100"));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createPositiveBinaryArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createNegativeBinaryArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
        }
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Octal")
    class ToOctalConversion {

        private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveOctalArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "12"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "62"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "4704"));
        }

        private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeOctalArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "37777777766"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "37777777716"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "37777773074"));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createPositiveOctalArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createNegativeOctalArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
        }
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Hexal")
    class ToHexalConversion {

        private Stream<Arguments> createPositiveHexArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(positiveArguments[0], "A"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[1], "32"),
                    Arguments.of(positiveArguments[2], "9C4"));
        }

        private Stream<Arguments> createNegativeHexArguments() {
            return Stream.of(Arguments.of(negativeArguments[0], "FFFFFFF6"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[1], "FFFFFFCE"),
                    Arguments.of(negativeArguments[2], "FFFFF63C"));
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createPositiveHexArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("createNegativeHexArguments")
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
        }
    }
}

第三种方法:如果我要进行第二种方法,为每个测试用例创建新的参数方法是没有意义的,所以我决定将它们作为@CsvSource (因为只有-常量的注释参数,所以必须在数组之外初始化参数):

代码语言:javascript
复制
@TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
public class DecimalRepresentationTest {

    private DecimalRepresentation decimal;

    static private final String POSITIVE_A = "10", POSITIVE_B = "50", POSITIVE_C = "2500"; 
    static private final String NEGATIVE_A = "-10", NEGATIVE_B = "-50", NEGATIVE_C = "-2500";   

    @BeforeAll
    void init() {
        decimal = new DecimalRepresentation();
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(strings = "0")
    void shouldReturnZeroIfValueNotSpecified(String zero) {
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toBinary());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toOctal());
        assertEquals(zero, decimal.toHex());
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Binary")
    class ToBinaryConversion {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + POSITIVE_A + "', 1010",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_B + "', 110010",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_C + "', 100111000100"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + NEGATIVE_A + "', 11111111111111111111111111110110",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_B + "', 11111111111111111111111111001110",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_C + "', 11111111111111111111011000111100"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toBinary());
        }
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Octal")
    class ToOctalConversion {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + POSITIVE_A + "', 12",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_B + "', 62",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_C + "', 4704"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + NEGATIVE_A + "', 37777777766",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_B + "', 37777777716",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_C + "', 37777773074"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toOctal());
        }
    }

    @TestInstance(Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Decimal to Hexal")
    class ToHexalConversion {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + POSITIVE_A + "', A",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_B + "', 32",
                    "'" + POSITIVE_C + "', 9C4"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForPositiveNumbers(int positiveNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(positiveNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @CsvSource({"'" + NEGATIVE_A + "', FFFFFFF6",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_B + "', FFFFFFCE",
                    "'" + NEGATIVE_C + "', FFFFF63C"})
        void shouldReturnExpectedValuesForNegativeNumbers(int negativeNumber, String bitRepresentation) {
            decimal.setNumber(negativeNumber);
            assertEquals(bitRepresentation, decimal.toHex());
        }
    }
}

你怎么看出来的?在这种情况下我应该用哪一种?顺便说一句,当我测试一些像我的自定义数字系统转换器时,我能完全信任标准Java,而不是硬编码预期的结果,只使用Integer.toString(int i,int基)方法吗?

EN

回答 1

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2017-12-09 22:34:32

我建议的一般准则是:

  • 让每个测试测试一件事。如果测试中有多个断言,那么如果第一个断言失败,则永远不知道后面的断言是否也失败--通过拥有多个断言,您就隐藏了潜在检测其他错误的机会。
  • 让每个测试站都是独立的,这样您就不必依赖测试的顺序。当您只想重新运行失败的测试时,这是很有帮助的。
  • 是的,您应该依赖标准的Java类来执行他们所说的操作。为他们编写单元测试将比您需要做的工作更多(基本上,如果他们不按他们说的做,我们都会受到影响--因此他们更好;他们也比您可能编写的任何测试都经过了更彻底的测试)。
  • 让测试简单明了(应用“吻”原则,保持简单-简单-莎莉)

我意识到这并不能直接解决您的代码布局问题,但是它可能会帮助您做出一些决定。

票数 0
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47551271

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档