我有一个静态的泛型方法,用于并行地对集合执行一个操作(不要担心节流;我已经讨论过了;这里的代码是哑巴版本):
public static IEnumerable<Task> RunAllAsync<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, Action<T> action)
{
var tasks = new List<Task>();
foreach (var t in enumerable)
{
tasks.Add(Task.Run(() => action(t)));
}
return tasks;
}下面是一个如何使用的示例:
public async Task UsageSync()
{
var numbers = Enumerable.Range(1, 5);
var random = new Random();
var tasks = numbers.RunAllAsync(i =>
{
Console.WriteLine($"A {i}");
Thread.Sleep(random.Next(1000));
Console.WriteLine($"B {i}");
});
Console.WriteLine("Awaiting end");
await Task.WhenAll(tasks.ToArray());
Console.WriteLine("awaited");
Thread.Sleep(2000);
Console.WriteLine("Finished");
}输出:
Awaiting end
A 4
A 5
A 1
A 2
A 3
B 3
B 2
B 1
B 5
B 4
awaited
Finished一切如愿以偿。但是,现在我们将该操作本身设置为异步委托:
public async Task UsageAsync()
{
var numbers = Enumerable.Range(1, 5);
var random = new Random();
var tasks = numbers.RunAllAsync(async i =>
{
Console.WriteLine($"A {i}");
await Task.Run(() =>
{
Console.WriteLine($"B {i}");
Thread.Sleep(random.Next(1000));
Console.WriteLine($"C {i}");
});
});
Console.WriteLine("Awaiting end");
await Task.WhenAll(tasks.ToArray());
Console.WriteLine("awaited");
Thread.Sleep(2000);
Console.WriteLine("Finished");
}输出:
Awaiting end
A 4
B 4
A 1
A 5
A 3
A 2
B 2
awaited
B 5
B 1
B 3
C 3
C 2
C 1
C 5
C 4
Finished看到了吗?在线程完成之前,这个方法达到了“等待”!
我应该做些什么来确保等待异步操作?
发布于 2017-11-09 15:51:52
由于您处理的是Action<T>,所以async i => { ... }会被转换为async void方法。async void的设计使它不可能等待它完成。将参数更改为Func<T, Task> func,并将调用action(t)更改为await func(t)。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47205978
复制相似问题