当我运行这个查询时,平均花费了1.2421秒,我认为这很慢,我在WHERE子句中为每个可能的列添加了索引。所以我还可以做更多的改进来加速这个查询吗?包含大多数数据的表是eav,它有大约111276行/记录。
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS eav.entid,
ent.entname
FROM eav,
ent,
catatt ca
WHERE eav.entid = ent.entid
AND ent.status = 'active'
AND eav.status = 'active'
AND eav.attid = ca.attid
AND ca.catid = 1
AND eav.catid = 1
AND ( ca.canviewby <= 6
|| ( ent.addedby = 87
AND canviewby <= 6 ) )
AND ( ( eav.attid = 13
AND ( `char` = '693fafba093bfa35118995860e340dce' ) )
OR ( eav.attid = 3
AND `double` = 6 )
OR ( eav.attid = 45
AND ( `int` = 191 ) ) )
GROUP BY eav.entid
HAVING Count(*) >= 3 解释输出

catatt表指数

eav表索引

ent表索引

发布于 2017-08-20 01:50:11
我简化了您的查询以更好地理解它,从where子句中删除了不必要的情况,进行了查询规划。
因此,检查此查询并将其放到注释结果中,让我们在我的回答下调试它:
SELECT
SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS
eav.entid,
ent.entname
FROM
eav
INNER JOIN ent ON (eav.entid = ent.entid AND ent.status = 'active')
INNER JOIN catatt ON (eav.attid = catatt.attid AND catatt.catid = 1)
WHERE
eav.catid = 1 AND eav.status = 'active'
AND (catatt.canviewby <= 6 OR ent.addedby = 87)
AND
(
(eav.attid = 13 AND eav.`char` = '693fafba093bfa35118995860e340dce')
OR
(eav.attid = 3 AND eav.`double` = 6)
OR
(eav.attid = 45 AND eav.`int` = 191)
)
GROUP BY eav.entid
HAVING COUNT(eav.entid) > 2 UPDATE-ing表(数据大多被插入到这些表中)--因此,尝试将这些表的引擎变成MyISAMattid, char;attid, double;attid, inthttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/45777649
复制相似问题