我目前正在研究一种算法来确定风力涡轮机支撑结构的成本。我正在编写的算法需要优化初始输入支撑结构的重量,这样应力水平不会超过,而是接近所用材料性能的破坏准则。另一项要求是,结构的固有频率必须在两个值之间有界。为了优化结构,可以修改4个变量。
我是否可以使用Scipy.Optimize库中的一个函数来优化这个结构的重量,使用几个设计参数,但要考虑到支撑结构中的固有频率和最大应力值?
我正在优化的函数如下所示:
def func(self, x):
self.properties.D_mp = x[0] # Set a new diameter for the monopile
self.properties.Dtrat_tower = x[1] # Set a new thickness ratio for the tower
self.properties.Dtrat_tp = x[2] # Set a new thickness ratio for the transition piece
self.properties.Dtrat_mud = x[3] # Set a new thickness ratio for the mudline region of the monopile
self.UpdateAll() # Update the support structure based on the changes in variables above
eig = self.GetEigenFrequency() # Get the natural frequency
maxUtil = self.GetMaximumUtilisationFactor() # Get the maximum utilisation ratio on the structure (more than 1 means stress is higher than maximum allowed)
# Natural frequency of 0.25 and utilisation ratio of 1 are ideal
# Create some penalty...
penalty = (100000 * abs((eig - 0.25)))
penalty += (100000 * abs(maxUtil - 1))
return self.GetTotalMass() + penalty提前感谢!
发布于 2017-06-05 13:03:55
通过将频率和应力约束折叠为对整体适应度的惩罚,这可能是最简单的方法。
LOW_COST = 10.
MID_COST = 150.
HIGH_COST = 400.
def weight(a, b, c, d):
return "calculated weight of structure"
def frequency(a, b, c, d):
return "calculated resonant frequency"
def freq_penalty(freq):
# Example linear piecewise penalty function -
# increasing cost for frequencies below 205 or above 395
if freq < 205:
return MID_COST * (205 - freq)
elif freq < 395:
return 0.
else:
return MID_COST * (freq - 395)
def stress_fraction(a, b, c, d):
return "calculated stress / failure criteria"
def stress_penalty(stress_frac):
# Example linear piecewise penalty function -
# low extra cost for stress fraction below 0.85,
# high extra cost for stress fraction over 0.98
if stress_frac < 0.85:
return LOW_COST * (0.85 - stress_frac)
elif stress_frac < 0.98:
return 0.
else:
return HIGH_COST * (stress_frac - 0.98)
def overall_fitness(parameter_vector):
a, b, c, d = parameter_vector
return (
# D'oh! it took me a while to get this right -
# we want _minimum_ weight and _minimum_ penalty
# to get _maximum_ fitness.
-weight(a, b, c, d)
- freq_penalty(frequency(a, b, c, d))
- stress_penalty(stress_fraction(a, b, c, d)
)..。当然,你会希望找到更合适的点球函数,并发挥相对权重,但这应该会给你一个大致的想法。然后你就可以把它最大化
from scipy.optimize import fmin
initial_guess = [29., 45., 8., 0.06]
result = fmin(lambda x: -overall_fitness(x), initial_guess, maxfun=100000, full_output=True)(使用lambda让fmin (一个最小化器)为overall_fitness找到最大值)。
或者,fmin允许在每次迭代之后应用回调函数;如果您知道如何适当地调整a、b、c、d,则可以使用此函数对频率施加硬限制,比如
def callback(x):
a, b, c, d = x # unpack parameter vector
freq = frequency(a, b, c, d)
if freq < 205:
# apply appropriate correction to put frequency back in bounds
return [a, b, c + 0.2, d]
elif freq < 395:
return x
else:
return [a, b, c - 0.2, d]发布于 2017-06-05 13:00:12
您可以使用最少的spicy.optimize函数。
在我的例子中,它是用两个变量来拟合指数函数:
def func_exp(p, x, z):
# exponential function with multiple parameters
a, b, c, d, t, t2 = p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5]
return a*np.exp(b + pow(x,c)*t + pow(z,d)*t2)但是要使用最少的an函数,您需要创建一个错误函数,这个函数是您要优化的。
def err(p, x,z, y):
# error function compare the previous to the estimate to
return func_exp(p, x,z) - y
# minimise the residuals 使用它:
p0=[1e4,-1e-3,1,1,-1e-2, -1e-6]
# First parameters
pfit_fin, pcov, infodict, errmsg, success = leastsq(err, p0, args=(X,Y,Z), full_output=1, epsfcn=0.000001)因此,返回最佳参数,以生成结果:
Y_2= func_exp(pfit_fin, X,Y) 我希望这能帮到你
克里斯。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44369373
复制相似问题