我正在尝试将堆栈跟踪记录到Logstash中。
日志堆栈是ELK (ElasticSearch,Logstash,Kibana)。
生成日志的应用程序是一个Java应用程序,使用slf4j作为日志接口,使用log4j2作为日志实现。
log4j2.xml以RFC5424格式声明了这个syslog附录:
<Appenders>
<Syslog name="RFC5424" format="RFC5424" host="localhost" port="8514"
protocol="TCP" appName="MyApp" includeMDC="true" mdcId="mdc"
facility="LOCAL0" enterpriseNumber="18060" newLine="true"
messageId="Audit" id="App">
<LoggerFields>
<KeyValuePair key="thread" value="%t"/>
<KeyValuePair key="priority" value="%p"/>
<KeyValuePair key="category" value="%c"/>
<KeyValuePair key="exception" value="%ex{full}"/>
</LoggerFields>
</Syslog>
</Appenders>我记录了Java应用程序中的Throwable,如下所示:
org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger("exception_test").error("Testing errors", new RuntimeException("Exception message"));记录异常时,Logstash跟踪类似的内容,以向我展示它持续存在的内容:
{
"@timestamp":"2016-11-08T11:08:10.387Z",
"port":60397,
"@version":"1",
"host":"127.0.0.1",
"message":"<131>1 2016-11-08T11:08:10.386Z MyComputer.local MyApp - Audit [mdc@18060 category=\"exception_test\" exception=\"java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception message",
"type":"syslog",
"tags":[
"_grokparsefailure"
]
}我确认Kibana在它的一个日志条目的_source字段中显示完全相同的JSON。
这里有一个问题:没有保存堆栈跟踪。而“测试错误”这一信息就丢失了。
"tags":["_grokparsefailure"]是不幸的,但与这个问题无关。
我尝试添加<ExceptionPattern/>,看看它是否会改变任何事情:
<Syslog name="RFC5424" format="RFC5424" host="localhost" port="8514"
protocol="TCP" appName="MyApp" includeMDC="true" mdcId="mdc"
facility="LOCAL0" enterpriseNumber="18060" newLine="true"
messageId="Audit" id="App">
<LoggerFields>
<KeyValuePair key="thread" value="%t"/>
<KeyValuePair key="priority" value="%p"/>
<KeyValuePair key="category" value="%c"/>
<KeyValuePair key="exception" value="%ex{full}"/>
</LoggerFields>
<ExceptionPattern>%ex{full}</ExceptionPattern>
</Syslog><ExceptionPattern/>替换了日志消息,而且(遗憾的是)省略了所有loggerFields。但它确实给了我一个类名和行号:
{
"@timestamp":"2016-11-08T11:54:03.835Z",
"port":60397,
"@version":"1",
"host":"127.0.0.1",
"message":"at com.stackoverflow.LogTest.throw(LogTest.java:149)",
"type":"syslog",
"tags":[
"_grokparsefailure"
]
}再次:没有堆栈跟踪。再次声明:“测试错误”的消息丢失了。
如何使用log4j2将堆栈跟踪记录到Logstash中?我不一定要使用syslog附录。
主要的制约因素是:
发布于 2016-11-14 13:37:28
Log4j 2.5的SyslogAppender只能在UDP上发送堆栈跟踪。
<Syslog name="RFC5424" format="RFC5424" host="localhost" port="8514"
protocol="UDP" appName="MyApp" includeMDC="true" mdcId="mdc"
facility="LOCAL0" enterpriseNumber="18060" newLine="true"
messageId="LogTest" id="App">
<LoggerFields>
<KeyValuePair key="thread" value="%t"/>
<KeyValuePair key="priority" value="%p"/>
<KeyValuePair key="category" value="%c"/>
<KeyValuePair key="exception" value="%ex{full}"/>
</LoggerFields>
<ExceptionPattern>%ex{full}</ExceptionPattern>
</Syslog>使用UDP:ExceptionPattern 和 LoggerFields.KeyValuePair["exception"]开始作为多行堆栈跟踪的解决方案。
这就是当我通过syslog通过UDP发送异常时logstash输出的内容:
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T13:23:38.304Z,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "<131>1 2016-11-14T13:23:38.302Z BirchBox.local MyApp - LogTest [mdc@18060 category=\"com.stackoverflow.Deeply\" exception=\"java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception message\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Deeply.complain(Deeply.java:10)\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Nested.complain(Nested.java:8)\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Main.main(Main.java:20)\n\" priority=\"ERROR\" thread=\"main\"] Example error\njava.lang.RuntimeException: Exception message\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Deeply.complain(Deeply.java:10)\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Nested.complain(Nested.java:8)\n\tat com.stackoverflow.Main.main(Main.java:20)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}在[mdc@18060 exception=\"…\"]内部,我们得到LoggerFields.KeyValuePair["exception"]堆栈跟踪。
此外,由于ExceptionPattern,堆栈跟踪被插入到日志消息本身。
供参考:这是logstash通过syslog通过TCP发送异常时输出的内容(即上面描述的相同的SyslogAppender,但使用protocol="TCP" ):
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.293Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "<131>1 2016-11-14T19:56:30.277Z BirchBox.local MyApp - Audit [mdc@18060 category=\"com.stackoverflow.Deeply\" exception=\"java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception message",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.296Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Deeply.complain(Deeply.java:10)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.296Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Nested.complain(Nested.java:8)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.296Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Main.main(Main.java:20)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.296Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "\" priority=\"ERROR\" thread=\"main\"] Example error",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.296Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception message",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.297Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Deeply.complain(Deeply.java:10)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.298Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Nested.complain(Nested.java:8)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.298Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "at com.stackoverflow.Main.main(Main.java:20)",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"@timestamp" => 2016-11-14T19:56:30.299Z,
"port" => 63179,
"@version" => "1",
"host" => "127.0.0.1",
"message" => "",
"type" => "syslog",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}看起来TCP确实“工作”,但将单个日志消息拆分为许多syslog消息(例如,当遇到\n时)。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40486799
复制相似问题