首页
学习
活动
专区
圈层
工具
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >如何用磁带编写测试节点或javascript的自定义断言,或者检查子字符串而不是t.deepEquals()?

如何用磁带编写测试节点或javascript的自定义断言,或者检查子字符串而不是t.deepEquals()?
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2016-07-26 20:38:51
回答 1查看 1.5K关注 0票数 1

使用磁带,我如何编写一个自定义断言方法来代替t.equal()?或者,是否有一个测试断言方法可以检查子字符串,以便不用使用t.deepEqual()逐字比较我正在测试的整个字符串

代码语言:javascript
复制
var test = require("tape")

test('messages contain key words', function (t) {
  // this is what I'm using:
  t.equal(MyEncode(Fruit).indexOf('eat more') > -1,true,'should contain "eat more"')

  // this is what I want:
  t.contains(myEncode(Fruit),'eat more','should contain "eat more"')
  t.end()
})

在测试myEncode时,可以看到该字符串不包含子字符串,但无法查看实际值,因为它的计算结果仅为false,这并不能提供信息:

代码语言:javascript
复制
  not ok 1 should contain "eat more"
---
  operator: equal
  expected: true
  actual:   false
  at: checkCmd (/test.js:63:11)
...

通过阅读上面的测试输出,我不知道我的测试是否限制性太强,或者输出实际上是不正确的。相反,我希望看到myEncode返回的实际值,以加速查找问题:

代码语言:javascript
复制
  not ok 2 should contain "eat more"
---
  operator: contains
  expected: "eat more"
  actual:   "Apples are allowed to be eaten on weekdays and weekends"
  at: checkCmd (/test.js:66:11)
...
EN

回答 1

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2016-07-28 15:06:13

多亏了github tape 如何定义新的测试方法?#154中的@mbostock示例测试方法,我才让它开始工作。

函数,通常在另一个文件中进行测试(例如,appToTest.js)。

代码语言:javascript
复制
function brownFox(argument) {
    return "The "+argument+" fox jumped"
} 
exports.brownFox = brownFox

测试脚本:

代码语言:javascript
复制
// Test module typically named test.js
var test = require("tape")

var f = require("./appToTest")
// regular built-in test

test('String must match exactly', function (t) { // can be too specific
    t.deepEqual(f.brownFox('quick brown'), "The quick brown fox jumped") // should pass
    t.deepEqual(f.brownFox('quick black'), "The quick brown fox jumped") // will fail
    t.deepEqual(f.brownFox('quick white'), "The quick white fox jumped") // should pass
    t.comment('Strings must be fully specified to match word for word')
    t.end()
})
// It can be too tedious to maintain the test string to always 
// match exactly the string in the code being tested

// I don't care what the fox is as long as it jumped
// Since there is no "contains" test in tape, I hack t.equal()
test('String should contain a fox', function (t) {
    // does not show actual value when test fails; shows true or false instead
    // "jumped" must be tediously repeated to know what the test is about
    t.equal(f.brownFox('quick brown').indexOf("jumped") > -1, true, "contains jumped") // should pass
    t.equal(f.brownFox('quick black').indexOf("junped") > -1, true, "contains jumped") // should fail
    t.comment('failures are not descriptive')
    t.end()
})
// Using equal() can result in more time spent fixing or adjusting the test
// than coding the application

// So define your own tape test method
/////////////// Example of defining a custom tape test method
test.Test.prototype.stringContains = function(actual, contents, message) {
  this._assert(actual.indexOf(contents) > -1, {
    message: message || 'should contain '+contents,
    operator: 'stringContains',
    actual: actual,
    expected: contents
  });
};

/////////////// Example using a custom tape test method
test('String should contain a fox', function (t) {
    // shows actual value when test fails
    t.stringContains(f.brownFox('quick brown'), "jumped") // should pass
    t.stringContains(f.brownFox('quick brown'), "junped") // should fail
    // still supports custom message to override default message:
    t.stringContains(f.brownFox('quick brown'), "jumped", 'must contain "jumped"') // should pass
    t.stringContains(f.brownFox('quik white'), "jumped") // should pass
    t.comment('failures are more descriptive')
    t.end()
})

请注意,自定义的测试输出现在报告了“实际”字符串:

代码语言:javascript
复制
TAP version 13
# String must match exactly
ok 1 should be equivalent
not ok 2 should be equivalent
  ---
    operator: deepEqual
    expected: 'The quick brown fox jumped'
    actual:   'The quick black fox jumped'
    at: Test.<anonymous> (./tape-test.js:9:7)
  ...
ok 3 should be equivalent
# Strings must be fully specified to match word for word
# String should contain a fox
ok 4 contains jumped
not ok 5 contains jumped
  ---
    operator: equal
    expected: true
    actual:   false
    at: Test.<anonymous> (./tape-test.js:23:7)
  ...
# failures are not descriptive
# String should contain a fox
ok 6 should contain jumped
not ok 7 should contain junped
  ---
    operator: stringContains
    expected: 'junped'
    actual:   'The quick brown fox jumped'
    at: Test.test.Test.stringContains (./tape-test.js:33:8)
ok 8 must contain "jumped"
ok 9 should contain jumped
# failures are more descriptive

1..9
# tests 9
# pass  6
# fail  3

我安装了extend-tape,然后意识到我必须将它与babel一起使用,因为V8还不支持导入,但我不想将babel作为依赖项添加。

由于上面的代码有效,我不认为使用extend-tape有什么意义。

票数 2
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38599457

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档