我使用@Multitenant(SINGLE_TABLE)来支持多租户。为了解决n+1问题,我使用了eclipselink的批取特性。
@Entity
public class TestEntity implements Serializable {
@Id
@Column
private Long id;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "testEntity", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@BatchFetch(BatchFetchType.IN)
private List<TestEntityLine> lines = new ArrayList<>();
}
@Entity
public class TestEntityLine implements Serializable {
@Id
@Column
private Long id;
@JoinColumn(name = "PID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = true)
private TestEntity testEntity;
}当我使用以下方法查询时:
String boql = "SELECT e FROM TestEntity e order by e.id";
query.setFirstResult(1); // for pagination
query.setMaxResults(3); // for paginationsql和结果日志:
2016-06-16 10:05:14.558 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT ID AS a1 FROM TESTENTITY ORDER BY ID LIMIT ? OFFSET ?
bind => [3, 1]
entity-2
2016-06-16 10:05:14.594 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT ID, NAME, VALUE, PID FROM TESTENTITYLINE WHERE (PID IN (?,?,?))
bind => [2, 3, 4]
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-2
entity-3
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-3
entity-4
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-1所有这些都是完美的。但当我启用多租户时:
@Entity
public class TestMultiTenantEntity implements Serializable {
@Id
@Column
private Long id;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "testEntity", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@BatchFetch(BatchFetchType.IN)
private List<TestMultiTenantEntityLine> lines = new ArrayList<>();
}
@Entity
public class TestMultiTenantEntityLine implements Serializable {
@Id
@Column
private Long id;
@JoinColumn(name = "PID", referencedColumnName = "ID", nullable = true)
private TestMultiTenantEntity testEntity;
}
@MappedSuperclass
@Multitenant(SINGLE_TABLE)
@TenantDiscriminatorColumn(discriminatorType = DiscriminatorType.INTEGER, primaryKey = true, name = MultiTenantSupport.TENANT_COLUMN_NAME, length = 12, contextProperty = MultiTenantSupport.MULTITENANT_CONTEXT_PROPERTY)
public abstract class MultiTenantSupport {
public static final String MULTITENANT_CONTEXT_PROPERTY = "tenant_id";
public static final String TENANT_COLUMN_NAME = "TENANT_ID";
}当我使用以下方法查询时:
字符串boql =“从TestEntity e order by e.id选择e”;query.setFirstResult(1);//表示分页query.setMaxResults(3);//表示分页
sql和结果日志:
2016-06-16 10:17:17.123 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT TENANT_ID AS a1, ID AS a2 FROM TESTMULTITENANTENTITY WHERE (TENANT_ID = ?) ORDER BY ID LIMIT ? OFFSET ?
bind => [1, 3, 1]
entity-2
2016-06-16 10:17:17.159 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT t0.TENANT_ID, t0.ID, t0.NAME, t0.VALUE, t0.PID FROM TESTMULTITENANTENTITYLINE t0, TESTMULTITENANTENTITYLINE t1 WHERE ((((t1.TENANT_ID, t1.PID) IN ((?,?),(?,?),(?,?))) AND (t0.TENANT_ID = ?)) AND (t1.TENANT_ID = ?))
bind => [1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 1] **?????? Why TESTMULTITENANTENTITYLINE joins to itself t0/t1? This produce many duplicated records**
2016-06-16 10:17:17.227 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT TENANT_ID, ID FROM TESTMULTITENANTENTITY WHERE (((TENANT_ID = ?) AND (ID = ?)) AND (TENANT_ID = ?))
bind => [1, 1, 1] **?????? I try to fetch record 2,3,4, why it fetch out 1, 5, 6?**
2016-06-16 10:17:17.267 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT TENANT_ID, ID FROM TESTMULTITENANTENTITY WHERE (((TENANT_ID = ?) AND (ID = ?)) AND (TENANT_ID = ?))
bind => [1, 5, 1]
2016-06-16 10:17:17.295 [main] DEBUG o.e.p.s./.sql - SELECT TENANT_ID, ID FROM TESTMULTITENANTENTITY WHERE (((TENANT_ID = ?) AND (ID = ?)) AND (TENANT_ID = ?))
bind => [1, 6, 1]
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-1
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-2
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entityLine-2-3
entity-3
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-1
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-2
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entityLine-3-3
entity-4
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-1
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-2
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3
entityLine-4-3为什么TESTMULTITENANTENTITYLINE连接到它自己t0/t1?这会产生许多重复的记录。
我试图获取记录2,3,4,为什么要提取1,5,6?
你能帮忙吗?这是个虫子吗?还是我漏掉了什么?提前谢谢。
发布于 2016-06-22 09:51:41
通过以下设置从主键中删除tenant_id之后,它就可以工作了:
@TenantDiscriminatorColumn(primaryKey = false, ...)但是,尽管我不需要它们,但“加入和存在”选项仍然不起作用。在联接和存在sql中,所需的pids似乎不包含在where条件中。这就是为什么它加载所有其他不需要的条目
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37849075
复制相似问题