下面是我的SQL查询:
SELECT SUM(amz_event_shipment_items.quantity),
amz_event_shipment_items.seller_sku
FROM amz_event_shipment_items
INNER JOIN amz_event_fees ON amz_event_shipment_items.id = amz_event_fees.shipment_item_id
INNER JOIN amz_shipment_events ON amz_shipment_events.id = amz_event_shipment_items.shipment_event_id
WHERE amz_event_fees.currency = 'USD'
AND amz_shipment_events.event_type <> 'RefundEvent'
AND amz_shipment_events.posted_date BETWEEN '2016-5-1 07:00:00' AND '2016-5-7 06:59:59'
GROUP BY amz_event_shipment_items.seller_sku但返回的值太高了..。对我来说没道理..。
我有遗漏什么吗?
编辑
Many shipment_events for each date
Each shipment_event HAS MANY shipment_item / BELONGS TO ONE event
Each shipment_item HAS MANY shipment_fee / BELONGS TO ONE item发布于 2016-05-30 06:19:20
这不是一个答案,而是一个附件。如果我正确理解,您的查询返回错误的结果,但速度相当快,而我的查询(带有EXISTS子句)返回正确的结果,但速度非常慢。
因此,消除重复的任务似乎花费了太多的时间。
这里有两个想法:
的第一个想法:立即消除重复
在加入前,我们不会把收费计算在内,而是把费用集中起来:
select
sum(i.quantity),
i.seller_sku
from amz_event_shipment_items i
join -- join with only one record per ID to substitute an EXISTS clause
(
select distinct shipment_item_id
from amz_event_fees
where f.currency = 'USD'
) f on f.shipment_item_id = i.id
and exists
(
select *
from amz_shipment_events e
where e.event_type <> 'RefundEvent'
and e.posted_date between '2016-05-01 07:00:00' and '2016-05-07 06:59:59'
and e.id = i.shipment_event_id
)
group by i.seller_sku;第二个想法:预聚合值
在这里,我们试图尽快进行聚合,以便使中间结果保持较小,而不必查找每个单项记录的events表。
select
sum(i.pre_sum_quantity),
i.seller_sku
from
(
select seller_sku, shipment_event_id, sum(quantity) as pre_sum_quantity
from amz_event_shipment_items
where exists
(
select *
from amz_event_fees f
where f.currency = 'USD'
and f.shipment_item_id = amz_event_shipment_items.id
)
group by seller_sku, shipment_event_id
) i
where exists
(
select *
from amz_shipment_events e
where e.event_type <> 'RefundEvent'
and e.posted_date between '2016-05-01 07:00:00' and '2016-05-07 06:59:59'
and e.id = i.shipment_event_id
)
group by i.seller_sku;如果只有少数几个事件类型,您也可以尝试去掉<>,从而使它更有可能使用索引:
where e.event_type in ('EarlyPaymentEvent','LatePaymentEvent')(在这种情况下,可能需要在event_type位于posted_date之前的索引。)
我必须承认,我认为这些都不会比最初的EXISTS查询快多少,但可能值得一试。
发布于 2016-05-29 21:11:31
可能您的一个连接正在返回比您预期的更多的记录。我试着做一个select *,然后用sku和聚光灯对结果进行排序。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37514868
复制相似问题