所以我的情况是:
客户端表-有客户端数据等,不太令人兴奋
最近查看过的表,该表最近查看了客户端的内容,其结构如下:
( id INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY
, client_id INT NOT NULL
, cookie_user_id INT NOT NULL
, hotel_id INT NOT NULL
, added DATETIME NOT NULL
, comment TEXT
,status TINYINT NOT NULL DEFAULE 1
);目前,我有一个部分工作的SQL来删除最近查看的表中的行,该表目前全局限制了其中最新未删除记录的数量。这就是现在的样子
DELETE FROM `recently_viewed`
WHERE `recently_viewed`.`id` NOT IN (
SELECT id
FROM (
SELECT `id`
FROM `recently_viewed`
WHERE `client_id` IN (SELECT `id` FROM `klijenti`)
ORDER BY `id` DESC
LIMIT 5
) x
)
AND `client_id` <> 0“限制5”部分应限制在“每个客户”的基础上保留在最近查看的表中的N条记录。现在,它将最近查看的表中的记录限制为5,无论有多少客户端实际在那里有记录。因此,如果我有10个客户端,其中每个客户端在该表中有8个记录,那么我希望这个查询删除所需的最古老的记录,以便只为每个客户端保留5个最新的最近查看的项目,而不只是在表中保留5个,忽略了“每个客户端”的逻辑。希望这对你有意义:)
目前,如果我首先获取应用程序中的所有客户端,然后执行一个foreach循环为每个客户端进行另一个查询,并留下他最近查看的5个项目,这个查询就可以了,但是我希望在一个SQL查询中这样做。
这是怎么做到的呢?谢谢
发布于 2016-03-07 12:23:12
你可以这样做:
DELETE FROM `recently_viewed`
WHERE `recently_viewed`.`id` NOT IN (
SELECT id
FROM (
SELECT t.`id`,count(*) as rnk
FROM `recently_viewed` t
INNER JOIN `recently_viewed` s
ON(t.`client_id` = s.`client_id` and t.added <= s.added)
WHERE t.`client_id` IN (SELECT `id` FROM `klijenti`)
GROUP BY t.`ID`
) x
WHERE rnk <= 5
)
AND `client_id` <> 0发布于 2016-03-07 12:28:44
您可以使用vartiable来计算每个client_id的5条最新记录
DELETE FROM `recently_viewed`
WHERE `recently_viewed`.`id` NOT IN
(
SELECT id
FROM (
SELECT `id`,
@rn := IF(@cid = `client_id`, @rn + 1,
IF(@cid := `client_id`, 1, 1)) AS rn
FROM `recently_viewed`
CROSS JOIN (SELECT @rn := 0, @cid := 0) AS vars
WHERE `client_id` IN (SELECT `id` FROM `klijenti`)
ORDER BY `client_id`, `id` DESC) x
WHERE x.rn <= 5
)发布于 2016-03-07 12:38:15
乔戈斯的回答更快,但这里有另一个方法..。
考虑以下几点..。
SELECT * FROM my_table ORDER BY x,i;
+---+------+
| i | x |
+---+------+
| 2 | A |
| 3 | A |
| 6 | A |
| 8 | A |
| 1 | B |
| 5 | B |
| 4 | C |
| 7 | C |
| 9 | C |
+---+------+假设我们想为每个x选择两个最新的I。
SELECT m.* FROM my_table m JOIN my_table n ON n.x = m.x AND n.i >= m.i GROUP BY m.i HAVING COUNT(*) <= 2;
+---+------+
| i | x |
+---+------+
| 1 | B |
| 5 | B |
| 6 | A |
| 7 | C |
| 8 | A |
| 9 | C |
+---+------+此集合的反式如下.
SELECT m.* FROM my_table m JOIN my_table n ON n.x = m.x AND n.i >= m.i GROUP BY m.i HAVING COUNT(*) > 2;
+---+------+
| i | x |
+---+------+
| 2 | A |
| 3 | A |
| 4 | C |
+---+------+反过来,...which也可以合并到删除中。这是一种简单的方法.
DELETE a FROM my_table a
JOIN
( SELECT m.* FROM my_table m JOIN my_table n ON n.x = m.x AND n.i >= m.i GROUP BY m.i HAVING COUNT(*) > 2 ) b
ON b.i = a.i;
Query OK, 3 rows affected (0.03 sec)
SELECT * FROM my_table ORDER BY x,i;
+---+------+
| i | x |
+---+------+
| 6 | A |
| 8 | A |
| 1 | B |
| 5 | B |
| 7 | C |
| 9 | C |
+---+------+正如我所说的,如果性能是关键的,那么请按照Giorgos提供的思路来看一个解决方案。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35843462
复制相似问题