这是我的功能:
let rec applyAll rules expr =
rules
|> List.fold (fun state rule ->
match state with
| Some e ->
match applyRule rule e with
| Some newE -> Some newE
| None -> Some e
| None -> applyRule rule expr) None
|> Option.bind (applyAll rules)它接受一组规则并应用它们,直到尽可能减少输入表达式。我可以将Option.bind重写为一个match表达式,它显然可以利用尾调用优化。但是,这对我来说更优雅,所以我想保持原样,除非它会不必要地消耗堆栈。F#用这个代码做TCO吗?
编辑:这段代码总是不返回任何内容;我将修复它,但我认为这个问题仍然有意义。
发布于 2016-11-22 08:14:11
我将您的代码粘贴到一个文件tco.fs中。我添加了一个applyRule函数以使其可编译。
tco.fs
let applyRule rule exp =
Some ""
let rec applyAll rules expr =
rules
|> List.fold (fun state rule ->
match state with
| Some e ->
match applyRule rule e with
| Some newE -> Some newE
| None -> Some e
| None -> applyRule rule expr) None
|> Option.bind (applyAll rules)然后我制作了一个批处理文件来分析IL。
compile_and_dasm.bat
SET ILDASM="C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v10.0A\bin\NETFX 4.6 Tools\ildasm.exe"
Fsc tco.fs
%ILDASM% /out=tco.il /NOBAR /tok tco.exe作为输出,我们找到包含IL的tco.il。相关的功能在这里。
.method /*06000002*/ public static class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!b>
applyAll<a,b>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!!a> rules,
string expr) cil managed
{
.custom /*0C000003:0A000003*/ instance void [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.CompilationArgumentCountsAttribute/*01000007*/::.ctor(int32[]) /* 0A000003 */ = ( 01 00 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 )
// Code size 26 (0x1a)
.maxstack 8
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: newobj instance void class Tco/*02000002*//applyAll@13/*02000003*/<!!b,!!a>/*1B000004*/::.ctor(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!1>) /* 0A000004 */
IL_0006: newobj instance void class Tco/*02000002*//'applyAll@6-1'/*02000004*/<!!a>/*1B000005*/::.ctor() /* 0A000005 */
IL_000b: ldnull
IL_000c: ldarg.0
IL_000d: call !!1 [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.ListModule/*01000009*/::Fold<!!0,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<string>>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!1,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!0,!!1>>,
!!1,
class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!!0>) /* 2B000001 */
IL_0012: tail.
IL_0014: call class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!1> [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.OptionModule/*0100000A*/::Bind<string,!!1>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!0,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!1>>,
class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!0>) /* 2B000002 */
IL_0019: ret
} // end of method Tco::applyAll我们在这里看到尾部操作码是生成的。这是IL编译器对JIT编译器(实际上生成可执行机器代码)的提示,这里应该可以进行尾调用。
尾调用是否实际执行取决于JIT编译器,可以读取here。
发布于 2016-04-29 20:53:37
答案是“不”
正如您所说的,将通过将Option.Bind“扩展”为match表达式来优化调用。这样做将正确地将对applyAll的递归调用放在尾位置。
在Option.Bind位于尾部位置的情况下,堆栈将像
+ …
+ applyAll
+ Option.Bind
+ applyAll
+ Option.Bind
_ applyAllF#编译器不会对此进行优化。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35023814
复制相似问题