我正在编写一个与硬件通信的应用程序。当应用程序可以并行地接收和处理多个请求时,硬件却不能!
硬件要求这些并行请求基本上被组织成一个线性请求链,一个接一个地执行。
我还需要能够优先处理请求,因为有些是不紧急的后台进程,有些是实时的,需要跳到队列的最前面立即处理。
我对队列没有太多的经验,但是如果这样的库不存在的话,我会感到惊讶。
发布于 2015-05-29 11:12:37
请参阅https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/PriorityQueue.html
我建议对具有优先级值的请求使用包装器,特别是对于这个队列。例如,您可以使用该值来计算
value = timestamp % N * priorityLevel N取决于您处理事件所需的时间。
priorityLevel是指较低的值意味着更紧急(大于零)
编辑:注释中的规范后
您似乎需要创建ThreadPoolExecutor实例并将其传递给您自己的队列,这将是PriorityBlockingQueue的实例。放入这个池中的任务需要实现可比的,它将根据它们的执行优先级对它们进行排序。
见位旧参考,但作为灵感应该是足够的。
编辑:建议的优先级函数对较小的N是危险的,现在看数字,在溢出发生之前,长可以乘以很多,所以离开模出会越来越少,特别是当你只有两个优先级级别时(抱歉,迷惑了)
编辑:建议解决方案的实现
import java.util.concurrent.PriorityBlockingQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class QTest {
public static void main(String[] args){
//create executor with exactly one thread (first four arguments) that is
//using priority queue to store tasks (it takes care of sorting by priority)
ThreadPoolExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolExecutor(1, 1, 0, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new PriorityBlockingQueue());
executor.execute(new EventWrapper(1, "A"));
executor.execute(new EventWrapper(2, "B"));
executor.execute(new EventWrapper(1, "C"));
executor.execute(new EventWrapper(3, "D"));
executor.execute(new EventWrapper(1, "E"));
//just to have it terminated once test is done
executor.shutdown();
}
}
//in this wrapper should be loaded anything you want to have executed
class EventWrapper implements Comparable<EventWrapper>, Runnable{
public final long priority;
//name just to recognize what is being executed
public final String name;
public EventWrapper(int priority, String name){
//priority function out of current time, can be obviously inserted from elsewhere
this.priority = priority*System.currentTimeMillis();
this.name = name;
}
@Override
public int compareTo(EventWrapper that) {
//lower priority first
if(this.priority==that.priority)return 0;
return this.priority>that.priority?1:-1;
}
@Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Executing task "+name+" with priority "+priority);
//sleep to rule out speed of insertion in executor
try {Thread.sleep(1000);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {}
}
}创建的任务的结果是
Executing task A with priority 1433276819484
Executing task C with priority 1433276819485
Executing task E with priority 1433276819485
Executing task B with priority 2866553638970
Executing task D with priority 4299830458455发布于 2015-06-01 10:03:16
如果您已经熟悉PriorityBlockingQueue,为什么不直接轮询它来处理硬件请求呢?
public class HardwareHandler
public static final PriorityBlockingQueue<Message> queue =
new PriorityBlockingQueue<Message>();
static {
while (true) {
Message m = queue.take();
handleMessage(m);
}
}
private static void handleMessage(Message m) {
// handle message....
}
}发布于 2015-06-02 07:27:19
根据所有有用的评论和答案,我确定可能没有一个预先构建的解决方案。为了尝试为这个问题提供一个全面的答案,我尝试过使用PriorityBlockingQueue编写我自己的实现。
我在StackExchange代码评审上发布了代码,您可以看到完整的代码和任何社区建议的改进。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30527960
复制相似问题