我有一个长期运行的过程,它导入产品,并不时地出现死锁错误。据我所知,如果在脚本执行期间,我将隔离级别切换到Serializable,我将解决死锁问题。但是,我能做什么,我可以打开两个终端,并复制死锁与Serializable。
conn1: SET GLOBAL TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALAZIBLE;
conn1: START TRANSACTION;
conn2: START TRANSACTION;
conn1: UPDATE core_config_data set value = 1 WHERE config_id = 1;
conn2: UPDATE core_config_data set value = 1 WHERE config_id = 2;
conn1: UPDATE core_config_data set value = 1 WHERE config_id = 2; waiting...
conn2: UPDATE core_config_data set value = 1 WHERE config_id = 1; ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction好的,之后我尝试了dirty reads和READ UNCOMMITED
conn1: SET GLOBAL TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;
conn1: START TRANSACTION;
conn1: SELECT junk FROM employees WHERE employee_id = 1; junk=test;
conn2: START TRANSACTION;
conn2: update employees set junk='test1' where employee_id = 1;
conn1: SELECT junk FROM employees WHERE employee_id = 1; junk=test;你知道我哪里弄错了吗?
发布于 2014-08-19 11:06:19
一切都如预期。您不能仅仅通过隔离级别来避免死锁;隔离级别仅用于数据的完整性。
您可以通过确保更新行的相同顺序来解决许多死锁问题。这样,第一个连接将能够在没有死锁的情况下处理到最后,然后连接2也将失败或失败。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24428445
复制相似问题