我有一些评估原始程序的代码。程序是一个语句列表(表达式、块、返回语句)。评估结果是最后一次评估表达式。此外,评估人员应该正确对待return语句(即在return第一次出现后停止评估)。
为了实现这个逻辑,我传递特殊的回调函数(NextStep),它在当前语句之后执行下一个评估步骤。在处理返回语句时,我不调用下一步:
data Statement =
Expr Int
| Block [Statement]
| Return Int
deriving (Show, Eq)
data Value =
Undefined
| Value Int
deriving (Show, Eq)
type NextStep = Value -> Value
evalStmt :: Statement -> NextStep -> Value
evalStmt (Expr val) next =
let res = Value val
in next res
evalStmt (Block stmts) next = evalBlock stmts next
evalStmt (Return val) next = Value val
evalBlock :: [Statement] -> NextStep -> Value
evalBlock [] next = next Undefined
evalBlock [st] next = evalStmt st next
evalBlock (st:rest) next = evalStmt st $ \ _ -> evalBlock rest next
evalProgram stmts = evalBlock stmts id
prog1 = [Expr 1, Block [Return 3, Expr 2], Expr 4]
evalProg1 = evalProgram prog1 -- result will be Value 3问题是,我如何用连续monad重写这段代码?我想摆脱evalStmt和evalBlock函数中显式传递的evalBlock回调。有可能吗?
发布于 2014-05-11 15:36:04
翻译相当机械。
请记住,在延续monad中,return将值输入到延续中。
evalStmt :: Statement -> Cont Value Value
evalStmt (Expr val) =
let res = Value val
in return res
evalStmt (Block stmts) = evalBlock stmts
evalStmt (Return val) = cont $ \_ -> Value val
evalBlock :: [Statement] -> Cont Value Value
evalBlock [] = return Undefined
evalBlock [st] = evalStmt st
evalBlock (st:rest) = evalStmt st >> evalBlock rest
evalProgram :: [Statement] -> Value
evalProgram stmts = runCont (evalBlock stmts) id为了模拟早期的返回,我们忽略了给Return val的延续,只返回我们拥有的值。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23594116
复制相似问题