我是爪哇大学的新人。我只是在尝试线程,我想要创建类似线程池的东西(如果这就是我正在做的事情的话)。
基本上,我有一个while循环,它触发线程直到仍然有任务要执行&而最大并发线程不大于n。每个线程使用java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock围绕任务计数变量(在每个线程中减少)和线程计数变量(在线程结束之前线程启动和减少而增加)提供一个锁(代码闻到了吗?):
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
//overcome limitation of closure not being able to modify outer variable with arr.
final int[] runningThreads = {0};
final int[] taskcount = {10};
final Lock _mutex = new ReentrantLock(true);
int maxThreadQty = 3;
while ((taskcount[0] > 0) && (runningThreads[0] < maxThreadQty)) {
new Thread("T") {
public void run() {
System.out.println("New Thread Started");
_mutex.lock();
runningThreads[0]++;
System.out.println("Running Threads: " + runningThreads[0]);
System.out.println("Times to go: " + taskcount[0]);
_mutex.unlock();
// actually do something;
_mutex.lock();
taskcount[0]--;
runningThreads[0]--;
_mutex.unlock();
}
}.start();
}
}
}当我运行代码时,新线程将永远被触发,任务计数只会减少两三次.
输出的最后一行(读取时间作为要执行的任务):
Running Threads: 565
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 566
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 567
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 568
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 569
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 570
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 571
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 572
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 573
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 574
Times to go: 8
Running Threads: 575
Times to go: 8
CTRL-C我确信我使用线程或锁的方式肯定有什么问题。但是作为一个java新手,有很多事情我可能会错过(甚至是最基本的),所以我们非常感谢一些帮助和一些帮助我回到正确的道路上。谢谢。
我使用它作为线程的参考:http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-concurrency/creating-and-starting-threads.html
然后给出堆栈溢出的答案,看看如何使用ReentrantLock:https://stackoverflow.com/a/12510490/988591
这是因为闭包不能修改外部变量(使用数组值):http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ClosuresThatWorkAroundFinalLimitation
发布于 2014-04-25 12:25:51
你不能使用内置线程池功能吗?
如果不是,问题是在每个线程启动并获得锁之前,runningThreads不会增加。在实践中,主线程可能运行相当长的时间,同时不受限制地旋转新线程。
一种解决方案可能是在启动新线程之前增加主线程上的runningThreads变量,但在每个工作线程中保留减少变量。
我不想建议您的代码的其他一切都是“好的”(创建一个健壮的线程池实现可能是一个相当困难和复杂的任务),但是一个可能避免问题的最小的更改可能是。
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
//overcome limitation of closure not being able to modify outer variable with arr.
final int[] runningThreads = {0};
final int[] taskcount = {10};
final Lock _mutex = new ReentrantLock(true);
int maxThreadQty = 3;
while ((taskcount[0] > 0) && (runningThreads[0] < maxThreadQty)) {
System.out.println("New Thread Started");
_mutex.lock();
runningThreads[0]++;
System.out.println("Running Threads: " + runningThreads[0]);
System.out.println("Times to go: " + taskcount[0]);
_mutex.unlock();
new Thread("T") {
public void run() {
// actually do something;
_mutex.lock();
taskcount[0]--;
runningThreads[0]--;
_mutex.unlock();
}
}.start();
}
}
}https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23292819
复制相似问题