在这个查询中,我试图根据给定的过滤器获取记录的总数,并试图在一个查询中获取分页所需的有限数量的数据。在前面的两个步骤中,我首先根据Optimising Select number of rows in PostgreSql for multiple group by fields计算记录数,然后根据页面大小和所需的偏移量在不同的查询中获得所需的行数。
EXPLAIN select count (1) OVER () AS numrows , lower(column1) as column1, column2, column3, column4, column5, column6, column7, column8, sum(column9) as column9, sum(column10) as column10
from tableName tablename
where
column8 in (SOME 50-100 sets)
and column_date >= '2013-09-01'
and column_date < '2013-09-30'
group by lower(column1), column2, column3, column4, column5, column6, column7, column8
ORDER BY column9 desc
LIMIT 1000 OFFSET 0
XN Limit (cost=1000134721702.61..1000134721702.63 rows=1000 width=67)
-> XN Merge (cost=1000134721702.61..1000135118514.84 rows=158724893 width=67)
Merge Key: sum(column9)
-> XN Network (cost=1000134721702.61..1000135118514.84 rows=158724893 width=67)
Send to leader
-> XN Sort (cost=1000134721702.61..1000135118514.84 rows=158724893 width=67)
Sort Key: sum(column9)
-> XN Window (cost=107149638.61..113101822.10 rows=158724893 width=67)
-> XN Network (cost=107149638.61..108340075.31 rows=158724893 width=67)
Send to slice 0
-> XN HashAggregate (cost=107149638.61..108340075.31 rows=158724893 width=67)
-> XN Seq Scan on tableName tablename (cost=0.00..67468415.44 rows=1587248927 width=67)
Filter: ((column_date < '2013-09-30'::date) AND (column_date >= '2013-09-01'::date) AND (column8 = ANY ('{SOME 50-100 sets}'::integer[])))版本细节
PostgreSQL 8.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3), Redshift 1.0.666 谢谢
发布于 2013-10-14 15:06:26
对于分页记录返回,没有优化红移。它的目的是最大限度地提高分析查询的性能,这些查询涉及许多记录,但只返回一个很小的输出。
如果您打算对结果进行分页,我强烈建议首先将SELECT的输出发送到临时表。然后,您可以做一个简单的(和快速!)在该表上计数(*)并对其分页,而不强制重新执行查询。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19095925
复制相似问题