从Redis的源代码中,在文件src/调试器c中,它使用backtrace()记录调用堆栈。在这些操作中,我注意到了getMcontextEip(),看起来在Linux中是这样的:
static void *getMcontextEip(ucontext_t *uc) {
/* Linux */
#if defined(__i386__)
return (void*) uc->uc_mcontext.gregs[14]; /* Linux 32 */
#elif defined(__X86_64__) || defined(__x86_64__)
return (void*) uc->uc_mcontext.gregs[16]; /* Linux 64 */
#elif defined(__ia64__) /* Linux IA64 */
return (void*) uc->uc_mcontext.sc_ip;
#endif
}所有这些的机制是:当有一个信号(即SIGFPE)时,它将被捕获并尝试将调用堆栈记录到文件中:
void log_stack_trace(ucontext_t *uc) {
void *trace[100];
int fd = open(file);
int trace_size = backtrace(trace, 100); /* get call stack */
/* overwrite sigaction with caller's address */
if (getMcontextEip(uc) != NULL)
trace[1] = getMcontextEip(uc);
backtrace_symbols_fd(trace, trace_size, fd); /* log to file */
}从注释中,我们知道它被设计为用调用者的地址覆盖sigaction,但是有什么提示可以这样做吗?我模拟了一个SIGFPE信号并在GDB中进行了调试,ucontext_t看起来是这样的:
(gdb) p *uc
$6 = {
uc_flags = 0,
uc_link = 0x0,
uc_stack = {
ss_sp = 0x0,
ss_flags = 2,
ss_size = 0
},
uc_mcontext = {
gregs = {51, 0, 123, 123, 0, 0, -1073745320, -1073745376, -1208258560, 0, -1073745852, 5, 0, 0, 134514547, 115, 2163270, -1073745376, 123},
fpregs = 0xbfffefb0,
oldmask = 0,
cr2 = 0
},
uc_sigmask = {
__val = {0, 0, 44472, 8441088, 0, 0, 4294902655, 4294901760, 4294967295, 0 <repeats 23 times>}
},
__fpregs_mem = {
cw = 0,
sw = 0,
tag = 895,
ipoff = 0,
cssel = 0,
dataoff = 0,
datasel = 0,
_st = {{
significand = {0, 0, 8064, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}, {
significand = {0, 0, 0, 0},
exponent = 0
}},
status = 0
}
}在getMcontextEip中,它只是在i386平台上返回uc->uc_mcontext.gregs[14],为什么要这样做?为什么14个而不是其他(有19个元素)?
发布于 2013-10-16 05:10:03
我相信"14“是EIP寄存器,所以当前的指令指针(又名程序计数器)是您需要知道信号被接收时在呼叫堆栈中的位置的起点。
您可能会发现,V8如何将此用于其抽样分析器:edge/src/sampler.cc?spec=svn16109&r=16109是有用的。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18913859
复制相似问题