首页
学习
活动
专区
圈层
工具
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >TokuDB在MariaDB中的性能

TokuDB在MariaDB中的性能
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2013-09-09 11:19:25
回答 1查看 3.1K关注 0票数 3

我在TokuDB引擎上做了一些性能测试(我使用了来自戴尔PowerEdge R720上Tokutek网站的MariaDB5.5.30-Tokudb-7.0.4,内存为128 up,TokuDB的默认内存分配为64 up tokudb_cache_size),并出现了一些意想不到的事情。

在测试场景中,我在一个空表 (33列、1个主auto_increment键、5个索引)上插入了大约9000万行,虽然我注意到与MyISAM引擎相比,速度性能和数据压缩非常显著,即从15K到20K记录/秒30G数据到带有TokuDB的7G,查询性能急剧下降(没有索引是群集的)。

特别是简单的查询:从test_table中选择count(*);MyISAM花费了0.0001秒,而TokuDB则上升到20秒。还查询扫描所有90M行表(,其中column_not_indexed = something),并为MyISAM接受2 5min,而TokuDB的持续时间超过5分钟!所有其他查询的性能也都有所下降。他们没有一个比MyISAM更好的相同大小的桌子。

因此,虽然我的理解是,TokuDB使用的分形树索引在查询速度上会有很好的性能,但这是不可能的。是否有任何测试过TokuDB的人遇到了同样的问题,或者能够给出如何提高查询性能的提示?

create语句是:

代码语言:javascript
复制
CREATE TABLE `table` (
`Event` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`TimeStamp` bigint(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`Field_1` smallint(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`Field_2` bigint(12) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`Field_3` varchar(40) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`Field_4` bigint(15) DEFAULT NULL,
(...)
PRIMARY KEY (`Event`) USING BTREE,
KEY `Index_ts` (`Timestamp`),
KEY `Index_1` (`Field_1`),
KEY `Index_2` (`Field_2`),
KEY `Index_3` (`Field_3`)
)ENGINE=TokuDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1

其中一些问题是:

代码语言:javascript
复制
SELECT count(*) FROM table  
**MyISAM:0.00981429   TokuDB:21.40218998**
SELECT Field_2, Timestamp FROM table IGNORE KEY (Index_3, Index_1) WHERE (Field_3 LIKE "%asweb.be") AND (Field_1 < 42) ORDER BY Timestamp LIMIT 2000
**MyISAM:125.9707183  TokuDB:356.6146628**
SELECT Field_2, Timestamp FROM table IGNORE KEY (Index_1) WHERE (Field_4 = "206012216849912") AND (Field_1 < 42) ORDER BY Timestamp LIMIT 2000
**MyISAM:120.0966643  TokuDB:293.2259202**
SELECT Field_2, Timestamp FROM table IGNORE KEY (Index_1) WHERE (Field_2 = "32475731333") AND (Field_1 < 42) ORDER BY Timestamp LIMIT 100000
**MyISAM:0.00552937   TokuDB:0.18659729**

另外:

代码语言:javascript
复制
Query 1: SHOW PROFILE CPU FOR QUERY 1;          
Status  Duration    CPU_user    CPU_system
Queried about 88450000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 88460000 rows 0.001902    0.004   0
Queried about 88470000 rows 0.001906    0   0
Queried about 88480000 rows 0.001905    0.004   0
Queried about 88490000 rows 0.001664    0   0
Queried about 88500000 rows 0.001907    0.004   0
Queried about 88510000 rows 0.001898    0   0
Queried about 88520000 rows 0.001903    0.004001    0
Queried about 88530000 rows 0.001902    0   0
Queried about 88540000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 88550000 rows 0.001661    0   0
Queried about 88560000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 88570000 rows 0.001901    0.004   0
Queried about 88580000 rows 0.001912    0   0
Queried about 88590000 rows 0.001902    0.004   0
Queried about 88600000 rows 0.001908    0   0
Queried about 88610000 rows 0.001664    0.004001    0
Queried about 88620000 rows 0.001899    0   0
Queried about 88630000 rows 0.001905    0.004   0
Queried about 88640000 rows 0.001901    0   0
Queried about 88650000 rows 0.0019  0.004   0
Queried about 88660000 rows 0.001661    0   0
Queried about 88670000 rows 0.001906    0.004   0
Queried about 88680000 rows 0.001895    0   0
Queried about 88690000 rows 0.001907    0   0
Queried about 88700000 rows 0.001907    0.004001    0
Queried about 88710000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 88720000 rows 0.001663    0.004   0
Queried about 88730000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 88740000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 88750000 rows 0.001899    0   0
Queried about 88760000 rows 0.001898    0.004   0
Queried about 88770000 rows 0.001898    0   0
Queried about 88780000 rows 0.001665    0.004001    0
Queried about 88790000 rows 0.0019  0   0
Queried about 88800000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 88810000 rows 0.001909    0   0
Queried about 88820000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 88830000 rows 0.001663    0   0
Queried about 88840000 rows 0.001902    0   0
Queried about 88850000 rows 0.001901    0.004   0
Queried about 88860000 rows 0.001903    0   0
Queried about 88870000 rows 0.0019  0.004001    0
Queried about 88880000 rows 0.001904    0   0
Queried about 88890000 rows 0.001662    0.004   0
Queried about 88900000 rows 0.001903    0   0
Queried about 88910000 rows 0.001901    0.004   0
Queried about 88920000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 88930000 rows 0.001904    0.004   0
Queried about 88940000 rows 0.001898    0   0
Queried about 88950000 rows 0.001666    0.004001    0
Queried about 88960000 rows 0.001901    0   0
Queried about 88970000 rows 0.001905    0.004   0
Queried about 88980000 rows 0.001899    0   0
Queried about 88990000 rows 0.001907    0   0
Queried about 89000000 rows 0.00166 0.004   0
Queried about 89010000 rows 0.001903    0   0
Queried about 89020000 rows 0.001899    0.004   0
Queried about 89030000 rows 0.001905    0   0
Queried about 89040000 rows 0.0019  0.004001    0
Queried about 89050000 rows 0.0019  0   0
Queried about 89060000 rows 0.001662    0.004   0
Queried about 89070000 rows 0.001897    0   0
Queried about 89080000 rows 0.001901    0.004   0
Queried about 89090000 rows 0.001894    0   0
Queried about 89100000 rows 0.001897    0.004   0
Queried about 89110000 rows 0.001891    0   0
Queried about 89120000 rows 0.001667    0   0
Queried about 89130000 rows 0.001899    0.004001    0
Queried about 89140000 rows 0.001901    0   0
Queried about 89150000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 89160000 rows 0.00191 0   0
Queried about 89170000 rows 0.001662    0.004   0
Queried about 89180000 rows 0.001906    0   0
Queried about 89190000 rows 0.001903    0.004   0
Queried about 89200000 rows 0.0019  0   0
Queried about 89210000 rows 0.001904    0.004001    0
Queried about 89220000 rows 0.001897    0   0
Queried about 89230000 rows 0.001663    0.004   0
Queried about 89240000 rows 0.001902    0   0
Queried about 89250000 rows 0.001906    0   0
Queried about 89260000 rows 0.001905    0.004   0
Queried about 89270000 rows 0.001903    0   0
Queried about 89280000 rows 0.001894    0.004   0
Queried about 89290000 rows 0.00166 0   0
Queried about 89300000 rows 0.001903    0.004001    0
Queried about 89310000 rows 0.001901    0   0
Queried about 89320000 rows 0.0019  0.004   0
Queried about 89330000 rows 0.001904    0   0
Queried about 89340000 rows 0.001661    0.004   0
Queried about 89350000 rows 0.001892    0   0
Queried about 89360000 rows 0.001808    0.004   0
Queried about 89370000 rows 0.000027    0   0
end 0.000008    0   0
query end   0.000008    0   0
closing tables  0.000008    0   0
freeing items   0.000007    0   0
updating status 0.000029    0   0
logging slow query  0.000005    0   0
cleaning up 0.000005    0   0

闻起来像虫子?

EN

回答 1

Stack Overflow用户

回答已采纳

发布于 2013-09-13 11:53:03

MyISAM在全表扫描中击败了InnoDB和TokuDB,因为它基本上只是按顺序扫描一个文件。

票数 3
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18697054

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档