这两个Mule流之间有什么区别

Question

<flow name="webserviceFlow1">
    <http:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" address="http://localhost:7079/service">
    <cxf:jaxws-service doc:name="SOAP" enableMuleSoapHeaders="false" serviceClass="MyService"/>
    </http:inbound-endpoint>
    <component class="MyServiceImpl" />        
</flow>

和

<flow name="webserviceFlow1">
    <http:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" address="http://localhost:7079/service"/>
    <cxf:jaxws-service doc:name="SOAP" enableMuleSoapHeaders="false" serviceClass="MyService"/>
    <component class="MyServiceImpl" />        
</flow>

Answer 1

如果流保持在您的问题中，它们在功能上是等价的。

如果您希望使这个流也可用于直接请求(例如通过VM传输，通过使用<composite-source> )，那么您将希望将cxf:jaxws-service限制为http:inbound-endpoint，这样CXF逻辑就不会启动，如下所示：

<flow name="webserviceFlow1">
    <composite-source>
        <vm:inbound-endpoint path="directAccess" />
        <http:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" address="http://localhost:7079/service">
            <cxf:jaxws-service doc:name="SOAP" enableMuleSoapHeaders="false" serviceClass="MyService"/>
        </http:inbound-endpoint>
    </composite-source>
    <component class="MyServiceImpl" />        
</flow>