在GNU图书馆参考手册中,有一个示例程序(第65页),但我不知道这三句话是什么意思:__malloc_hook = old_malloc_hook; old_malloc_hook = __malloc_hook; __malloc_hook = my_malloc_hook;。尤其是第二个,谁能为我解释呢?谢谢。
static void *
my_malloc_hook (size_t size, const void *caller)
{
void *result;
/* Restore all old hooks */
__malloc_hook = old_malloc_hook;
__free_hook = old_free_hook;
/* Call recursively */
result = malloc (size);
/* Save underlying hooks */
old_malloc_hook = __malloc_hook;
old_free_hook = __free_hook;
/* printf might call malloc, so protect it too. */
printf ("malloc (%u) returns %p\n", (unsigned int) size, result);
/* Restore our own hooks */
__malloc_hook = my_malloc_hook;
__free_hook = my_free_hook;
return result;
}我编写了一个小程序来测试它:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <malloc.h>
/* Prototypes for our hooks. */
static void my_init_hook(void);
static void *my_malloc_hook(size_t, const void *);
/* Variables to save original hooks. */
static void *(*old_malloc_hook) (size_t, const void *);
/* Override initializing hook from the C library. */
void (*__malloc_initialize_hook) (void) = my_init_hook;
static void my_init_hook(void)
{
old_malloc_hook = __malloc_hook;
__malloc_hook = my_malloc_hook;
}
static void *my_malloc_hook(size_t size, const void *caller)
{
void *result;
/* Restore all old hooks */
__malloc_hook = old_malloc_hook;
printf("1: __malloc_hook = %x old_malloc_hook = %x\n", __malloc_hook, old_malloc_hook);
/* Call recursively */
result = malloc(size);
printf("2: __malloc_hook = %x old_malloc_hook = %x\n", __malloc_hook, old_malloc_hook);
/* Save underlying hooks */
old_malloc_hook = __malloc_hook;
printf("3: __malloc_hook = %x old_malloc_hook = %x\n", __malloc_hook, old_malloc_hook);
/* printf() might call malloc(), so protect it too. */
printf("malloc(%u) called from %p returns %p\n",
(unsigned int)size, caller, result);
/* Restore our own hooks */
__malloc_hook = my_malloc_hook;
printf("4: __malloc_hook = %x old_malloc_hook = %x\n", __malloc_hook, old_malloc_hook);
return result;
}
int main(void)
{
char *p;
p = malloc(10);
free(p);
return 0;
}该方案的结果是:
1: __malloc_hook = 0 old_malloc_hook = 0
2: __malloc_hook = 0 old_malloc_hook = 0
3: __malloc_hook = 0 old_malloc_hook = 0
malloc(10) called from 0xb7797f38 returns 0x932c008
4: __malloc_hook = 804849d old_malloc_hook = 0但是现在我有更多的问题,为什么old_malloc_hook都是0,在1,2,3中,为什么__malloc_hook是0?我真的很困惑。帮帮我。
发布于 2012-07-06 14:20:14
据我所知,一切都如期而至,输出也很好。
变量__malloc_hook为0(或null),可能是因为系统的默认设置是没有malloc挂钩。
正如上面David所提到的,保存原始__malloc_hook非常重要,这样就可以在调用原始malloc()之前恢复它。这是评论/* Restore all old hooks */下面的一行。我猜想,在这种特殊情况下,这是不必要的,因为最初的malloc钩子是null,但是为了安全起见,应该这样做。
请放心,此代码正在运行,正如您希望的那样。现在,我只想让这个炖一会儿,也许一个灯泡会熄灭,总有一天,你会完全理解它。(对不起,这是我今天所能做的最好的了。)
发布于 2012-07-06 06:34:52
它在手册页中有很好的文档。
old_malloc_hook = __malloc_hook;:这会将当前的malloc挂钩保存在一个名为old_malloc_hook的变量中。想必,我们是在拯救它,因为我们即将改变它。__malloc_hook = my_malloc_hook;:这将当前malloc挂钩更改为my_malloc_hook。__malloc_hook = old_malloc_hook;:将malloc钩子更改回我们更改它之前的任何内容,即我们在old_malloc_hook中保存的值。发布于 2016-12-14 01:20:32
我认为这些答案缺少的是以下几点:
old_malloc_hook在开始时是NULL,然后malloc_hook = old_malloc_hook确保钩子是禁用的,我们在函数my_malloc_hook中调用实际的库函数malloc时不会无限递归。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11356958
复制相似问题