我正在尝试调整我的数据模型以使用BaseEntity基类。以下代码代表了一般的想法:
@MappedSuperclass
public abstract class BaseEntity implements HasAuditInfo {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
@Column(unique = true, nullable = false)
private String uuid;
private Long createdById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
@Column(nullable = false)
private Date createdOn;
private Long changedById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
@Column(nullable = false)
private Date changedOn;
@Column(nullable = false)
private Long changedOnValue;
private Boolean active;
private Long deactivatedById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
private Date deactivatedOn;
@NotNull
@DecimalMin("0")
private Integer version = 0;
private Long domainId;
[... Getters/Setters etc ...]
}以下是派生实体的示例:
@Entity
@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)
public class Address extends BaseEntity implements Serializable, Comparable<Address> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6301090657382674578L;
// Address Fields
@NotBlank(message = "Address Line 1 is a mandatory field.")
private String addressLine1;
private String addressLine2;
private String country;
@NotBlank(message = "Region is a mandatory field.")
private String region;
@NotBlank(message = "City is a mandatory field.")
private String city;
@NotBlank(message = "Zipcode is a mandatory field.")
private String zipcode;
[... Getters/Setters etc ...]
}如果我正确地理解了JPA文档,这应该是完全有效的,但是在部署我的代码时,我从EclipseLink得到了以下错误:
实体类com.x.y.z.Address没有指定主键。它应该定义一个@Id、@EmbeddedId或一个@IdClass。如果您使用这些注释中的任何一个定义了PK,那么确保在实体类层次结构中没有混合访问类型(字段和属性注释)。
我尝试过一些方法来解决这个问题:
Address
除了将我的代码迁移到Hibernate (或者其他一些更好的JPA实现)之外,这些方法都没有任何效果,我还能做些什么吗?
发布于 2011-08-04 16:30:13
解决方案是显式地命名BaseEntity中的每一列,如下所示:
@MappedSuperclass
public abstract class BaseEntity {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
@Column(name = "id")
@SearchableId
protected Long id;
@Column(name = "uuid", unique = true, nullable = false)
protected String uuid;
@Column(name = "createdById")
protected Long createdById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
@Column(name = "createdOn", nullable = false)
protected Date createdOn;
@Column(name = "changedById")
protected Long changedById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
@Column(name = "changedOn", nullable = false)
protected Date changedOn;
@Column(name = "changedOnValue", nullable = false)
protected Long changedOnValue;
@Column(name = "active")
protected Boolean active;
@Column(name = "deactivatedById")
protected Long deactivatedById;
@Temporal(value = TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
@Column(name = "deactivatedOn")
protected Date deactivatedOn;
@Version
@Column(name = "version")
protected Integer version = 0;
@Column(name = "domainId")
protected Long domainId;发布于 2011-07-26 13:08:54
您不应该得到这个错误。如果您将@Id移到地址中,则绝对不会。
您确定在进行更改后重新编译/部署了代码吗?
如果您移除TABLE_PER_CLASS继承,它是否有效?( Address有子类吗?)
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6820898
复制相似问题