blocks|key|1055789|text|意见:学习MooTools，然后继续使用它。听起来是个学习新东西的好机会。如果你不需要的话，为什么要引入一个全新的库来增加js膨胀。如果它能解决问题，你是金人。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1055790|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Opinion: Learn MooTools and then move on with it. Sounds like a great opportunity to learn something new. Why introduce an entirely new library with addition js bloat if you don't need to. If it'll solve the problem you're golden.

blocks|key|2574468|text|MooTools是一个非常可靠和可接受的Javascript库，我建议您将它添加到已知技术列表中，而不是将其删除并替换为JQuery。将两者混合不是一个好主意，因为您可能会遇到晦涩难懂的调试冲突。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2574469|JQuery最近得到了所有的媒体报道，但它绝不是被削减和干燥，它击败了所有其他图书馆的手。差得远呢。你甚至会发现你更喜欢MooTools+:-)|2574470|补充说:值得我亲身体验的是，MooTools似乎与其他javascript代码一起玩得比jQuery更好。我最近处理了几个站点，这些站点在MooTools中与其他不同效果/功能的Javascript混为一谈，而且所有这些都似乎与最小的问题一起进行。使用jQuery的OTOH页面倾向于使用所有东西的jQuery版本。当然了。|2574471|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

MooTools is a perfectly solid and acceptable Javascript library and I'd recommend you add it to your list of known technologies rather than tear it out and replace with JQuery. Mixing the two is not a good idea as you're likely to encounter obscure difficult to debug conflicts.

JQuery has had all the press of late, but it's by no means cut and dried that it beats every other library hands-down. Far from it. You might even find you prefer MooTools :-)

ADDED: For what it's worth my personal experience is that MooTools seems to play alongside other javascript code more nicely than jQuery. I've been handling several sites of late which have mixed in MooTools with various other pieces of Javascript for different effects/functionality and it's all seemed to play along together with minimal issues. OTOH pages that use jQuery tend to use jQuery versions of everything. YMMV of course.

blocks|key|2574378|text|就我个人而言，我建议不要同时使用这两种方法，因为存在奇怪的冲突，即使使用jQuery.noConflict()也是如此。和其中一个一起去。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|2574379|如果您确实同时使用了jQuery.noConflict()，那么一定要使用$来确保使用$不会发生冲突。|2574380|与其他库一起使用jQuery|2574381|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries^0|10|J|0|A|J|11|1|17|1|0|0|E|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@$9|S|A|T|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@$9|V|A|W|B|C]|$9|X|A|Y|B|C]|$9|Z|A|10|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|D|@$9|12|A|13|1|14]]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|E|$P|Q]]]]

Personally, I'd recommend not using both, as there are strange conflicts, even with <code>jQuery.noConflict()</code>. Go with one or the other.

If you do end up using both, be sure to use <code>jQuery.noConflict()</code> to ensure that using the <code>$</code> doesn't conflict.

<a href="http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries" rel="nofollow noreferrer" title="Using jQuery with Other Libraries">Using jQuery with Other Libraries</a>

blocks|key|1055880|text|我想说，这取决于代码是如何构造的，以及您需要做什么。mootools确实使自己易于重构和扩展(毕竟，这在一定程度上是它存在的原因)，但需要一段时间才能找到最佳实践等等。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1055881|但是，您从普通javascript或jquery获得的学习曲线不会太陡峭，特别是如果您只关心DOM的规定、事件处理和效果。当您决定编写/扩展mootools类并冒险进行原型开发时，事情会变得更有趣--但是您可能不必这样做…|1055882|对于大多数事情，都有一些相当不错的教程，也有一些关于通过jquery和mootools+(类似工具)来做事情的演示。http://jqueryvsmootools.com/是一个很好的例子，说明如何通过任何一个任务来完成相同的任务，我建议在决定之前阅读它。|offset|length|1055883|无论您如何决定，使用两个框架(当您可以不使用时)是一种糟糕的做法。|1055884|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://jqueryvsmootools.com/^0|0|0|1M|S|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$F|U|G|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

i'd say, depends on how the code is structured and what you need to do. mootools does render itself to easy refactoring and extending (this is, after all, partly the reason it exists) but it takes a while to figure best practices and so forth. 

however, your learning curve from vanilla javascript or jquery won't be too steep, especially so if all you care about is DOM mantipulation, event handling and effects. things get more interesting when you decide to write / extend mootools classes and venture into prototyping - but you may not have to do that... 

there are some pretty good tutorials around for most things as well as some demos on doing things through jquery and mootools (equivalent ones). <a href="http://jqueryvsmootools.com/" rel="noreferrer">http://jqueryvsmootools.com/</a> is a good example on how the same task can be done through either one, i'd recommend reading it before deciding. 

whatever you decide, it is a bad practice to use two frameworks (when you can do without).

blocks|key|1048867|text|这取决于转换到jQuery的项目有多大，您的工作有多少是维护这些页面(相对于其他已经使用jQuery的页面)，第一组更改的紧迫性等等。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1048868|这可以归结为成本比较:如何将业务成本转换为jQuery，而不是将业务成本与学习mooTools的成本进行比较(并且可能同时将mootools和jquery同时保存在头脑中)。|1048869|我唯一能肯定的是不要做选项3。这不一定是因为你不能让它工作(而且会有挑战)，而是因为你必须学习工具来正确地维护页面。一旦你这样做了，你就可以只保留它们的mootools，而不是重写所有东西，或者尝试混合框架。|1048870|就我个人而言，我倾向于将其转换为jQuery，因为我相信jQuery最终将垄断市场。因此，这意味着它将在某一时刻转换为jQuery，因此对业务的长期成本可能最好通过更早地进行转换来优化，同时需要转换的更少，而且mootools仍然具有相关性，因此您可以很容易地获得转换方面的帮助。但这肯定是有争议的。|offset|length|1048871|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/148670/why-is-the-fact-that-microsoft-decided-to-support-jquery-such-a-big-deal/148812#148812^0|0|0|0|S|D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$H|V|I|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

It depends on how big a project it would be to convert to jQuery, how much of your job is maintaing these pages (vs other pages that already use jQuery), what the urgency is for your first set of changes, etc...

It comes down to a cost comparison: how does the cost to your business to convert them to jQuery compare to the cost to the business for you to learn mooTools (and maybe keep both mootools and jquery in your head at the same time).

The only thing I can say for sure is don't do option 3. This isn't necessarily because it you can't make it work (and there will be challenges), but because you'll have to learn mootools to properly maintain the pages anyway. Once you do that, you may as well just keep them mootools rather than re-write everything or try to mix frameworks.

Personally I'm inclined to say convert it jQuery, since I believe <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/148670/why-is-the-fact-that-microsoft-decided-to-support-jquery-such-a-big-deal/148812#148812">jQuery is eventually going to corner the market</a>. The implication then is that it will convert to jQuery at some point, and so the long term costs to business are probably best optimized by doing the conversion earlier while there's less to convert and mootools is still relevant so you can easily get help with the conversion. But that's certainly arguable.

blocks|key|2574488|text|jQuery和Mootools的基础非常接近，所以从一个到另一个并不是一个令人头疼的问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2574489|每当我得到两者之间的选择时，我就倾向于使用Mootools+--特别是当我打算做任何效果或动画的时候。在我的经验中，Mootools的基础FX库更加健壮，并能产生更好的跨浏览器结果。|2574490|正如其他人所建议的那样，你可以利用这一机会作为一次学习经验。如果您对jQuery感到满意，并且不觉得有必要学习另一个框架，请将代码移植完毕。你不能真的做错的任何一个在最后。|2574491|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

jQuery and Mootools basics are close enough that moving from one to the other isn't much of a headache.

Whenever I'm given the choice between the two, I lean towards Mootools - especially if I'm intending to do any sort of effects or animations. Mootools's base FX libraries are far more robust and generate better results cross-browser in my experience.

Like others have suggested, you could take this opportunity as a learning experience. If you're satisfied with jQuery and don't feel the need to learn another framework, port the code over. You can't really go wrong with either in the end.

blocks|key|1055821|text|由于您对jQuery比较熟悉，所以我首先调用jQuery.noConflict();，然后用jQuery编写函数。当然，如果时间是一个因素的话。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1055822|entityMap^0|M|K|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

Since you're more comfortable with jQuery, I would just call <code>jQuery.noConflict();</code> first thing, and write the functions in jQuery. That is, of course, if time is a factor.

blocks|key|2574546|text|有一个一个项目，它扭曲和刺激工具使它看起来像JQuery+(一只披着羊皮的狼.或一枚金币涂成银币.|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2574547|我当然认为你应该学习Mootools，但这可能会有帮助。|2574548|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://github.com/cheeaun/mooj/^0|3|4|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

There is <a href="http://github.com/cheeaun/mooj/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a project</a> that twists and prods Mootools to make it look like JQuery (a wolf in a sheep's clothing... or a golden coin painted to look like silver...)

I certainly think you should learn Mootools, but that might help.

blocks|key|1049063|text|我同意那些赞成学习mootols的人，但我认为如果你做出这样的决定，那就更好了，因为你最终认为学习mootools值得。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1049064|因此，我认为对mootools功能进行一些研究是很好的。|1049065|我喜欢这篇关于这个主题的文章。我认为这对那些阅读这篇文章的人来说是有用的。|1049066|http://jqueryvsmootools.com/index.html|offset|length|1049067|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|0|0|12|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$H|U|I|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|G]]]]

I agree with those that are in favor of learning mootols, but i think that is even better if your take that decision because you finally think that learning mootools worth it.

So i think it would be nice to have some research over mootools capabilities.

I like this articule about this subject. And I think it can be useful for those reading this thread.

<a href="http://jqueryvsmootools.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://jqueryvsmootools.com/index.html</a>

I just inherited some web pages which uses MooTools. I never used MooTools. Now I need to add some functions on the page, I wonder if it's a good idea to use jquery and mooTools on the same page?

Basically, I have 3 options,

<ol>
<li>Convert the pages to JQuery, which I have to learn MooTools to do that.</li>
<li>Write new functions in MooTools. I have to learn even more MooTools to achieve this.</li>
<li>Use both on the page.</li>
</ol>

Your opinion will be appreciated.

MooTools and JQuery Side by Side

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我只是继承了一些使用MooTools的网页。我从未使用过MooTools。现在我需要在页面上添加一些函数，我想知道在同一个页面上使用jquery和mooTools是否是个好主意？基本上，我有三个选择，将页面转换为JQuery，我必须学习MooTools才能做到这一点。用MooTools编写新函数。为了实现这一点，我必须学习更多的MooTools。在页面上同时使用。您的意见将不胜感激。

问MooTools和JQuery并排
EN

回答 9

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问MooTools和JQuery并排EN

回答 9

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问MooTools和JQuery并排
EN