我正在上CS50课程,第五周我正在努力找出Pset5 Speller的答案。对于任何不熟悉的人,目标是编辑特定的.c文件以使五个函数正常运行,这样主函数(位于一个单独的文件中)可以执行以下操作:
将字典加载到哈希表中,将字典加载到哈希表中,通过此函数运行一个单词,以帮助将其加载到字典中,或者搜索单词的后继dictionary
。
请注意,这个文件是在类中给我的,我要编辑函数中的空间--我唯一能更改的是const unsigned int N = 1000;,我把它设置为1000,只是一个任意的数字,但它可以是任何东西。
我只在一件事上有困难(我能说出来)。为了使它运行,我已经做了一切,但是Check50 (告诉我是否正确的程序)告诉我我有内存错误:
Results for cs50/problems/2021/x/speller generated by check50 v3.3.0
:) dictionary.c exists
:) speller compiles
:) handles most basic words properly
:) handles min length (1-char) words
:) handles max length (45-char) words
:) handles words with apostrophes properly
:) spell-checking is case-insensitive
:) handles substrings properly
:( program is free of memory errors
valgrind tests failed; see log for more information.当我运行英勇时,这就是它给我的东西:
==347==
==347== HEAP SUMMARY:
==347== in use at exit: 472 bytes in 1 blocks
==347== total heap usage: 143,096 allocs, 143,095 frees, 8,023,256 bytes allocated
==347==
==347== 472 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==347== at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==347== by 0x4A29AAD: __fopen_internal (iofopen.c:65)
==347== by 0x4A29AAD: fopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (iofopen.c:86)
==347== by 0x401B6E: load (dictionary.c:83)
==347== by 0x4012CE: main (speller.c:40)
==347==
==347== LEAK SUMMARY:
==347== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==347== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==347== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==347== still reachable: 472 bytes in 1 blocks
==347== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==347==
==347== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)这在我看来很神秘,我希望有人能帮我解释和解决我的问题(而且Help50没有任何建议)。
这是我的实际代码(请记住,第二个文档中有一个主函数,它实际上利用了所提供的函数,因此可以,例如,函数似乎没有按正确的顺序排列)。
// Implements a dictionary's functionality
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include "dictionary.h"
// Represents a node in a hash table
typedef struct node
{
char word[LENGTH + 1];
struct node *next;
}
node;
// Number of buckets in hash table
const unsigned int N = 1000;
// Hash table
node *table[N];
// Dictionary size
int dictionary_size = 0;
// Returns true if word is in dictionary, else false
bool check(const char *word)
{
// TODO #4!
// make lowercase copy of word
char copy[strlen(word) + 1];
for (int i = 0; word[i]; i++)
{
copy[i] = tolower(word[i]);
}
copy[strlen(word)] = '\0';
// get hash value
int h = hash(copy);
// use hash value to see if word is in bucket
if (table[h] != NULL)
{
node *temp = table[h];
while (temp != NULL)
{
if (strcmp(temp->word, copy) == 0)
{
return true;
}
temp = temp->next;
}
}
return false;
}
// Hashes word to a number
unsigned int hash(const char *word)
{
// TODO #2
// source: https://www.reddit.com/r/cs50/comments/1x6vc8/pset6_trie_vs_hashtable/cf9189q/
// I used this source because I had trouble understanding different variations - this one explained everything well.
// I modified it slightly to fit my needs
unsigned int h = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(word); i++)
{
h = (h << 2) ^ word[i];
}
return h % N;
}
// Loads dictionary into memory, returning true if successful, else false
bool load(const char *dictionary)
{
// TODO #1!
// open dictionary file
FILE *file = fopen(dictionary, "r");
if (file == NULL)
{
return false;
}
// read strings from file one at a time
char word[LENGTH + 1];
while (fscanf(file, "%s", word) != EOF)
{
node *n = malloc(sizeof(node));
if (n == NULL)
{
return false;
}
// place word into node
strcpy(n->word, word);
// use hash function to take string and return an index
int h = hash(word);
// make the current node point to the bucket we want
n->next = table[h];
// make the bucket start now with the current node
table[h] = n;
//count number of words loaded
dictionary_size++;
}
return true;
}
// Returns number of words in dictionary if loaded, else 0 if not yet loaded
unsigned int size(void)
{
// TODO #3!
return dictionary_size;
}
// Unloads dictionary from memory, returning true if successful, else false
bool unload(void)
{
// TODO #5!
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
while (table[i] != NULL)
{
node *temp = table[i]->next;
free(table[i]);
table[i] = temp;
}
}
return true;
}发布于 2021-07-21 19:02:37
就像我们必须free我们malloc的每一个指针一样,我们必须fclose每一个我们fopen的FILE*。
你的问题来自于这条线:
FILE *file = fopen(dictionary, "r");它没有相应的fclose(file)调用。在返回之前,将其添加到loads函数的末尾。
瓦兰可以提供非常有用的调试信息(特别是当您的代码是用-g编译以进行调试信息时),如下所示:
==347== 472 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==347== at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==347== by 0x4A29AAD: __fopen_internal (iofopen.c:65)
==347== by 0x4A29AAD: fopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (iofopen.c:86)
==347== by 0x401B6E: load (dictionary.c:83)
==347== by 0x4012CE: main (speller.c:40)为您提供了堆栈跟踪,它分配了最终导致泄漏的内存--您可以看到,您自己的代码中的最后一行是dictionary.c:83,它是调用fopen的行。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68475131
复制相似问题