我正在尝试解码json文件中的正则表达式:
{
...
"expressions" : [
{"plus": [1, 2]},
{"less": [{"plus": [3, 4]}, 5]}
],
...
}我的目标是使用这种语法,以便尽可能清晰地输入这些语法。
最初,我使用了两个键控枚举,其中一个名为expressionDesc,可以是浮点数(.f1)、常量(.cnst)或操作(.op)。操作键的关联值为operatorDesc类型,这是第二个枚举。它包含操作符名称及其参数的表达式数组:
使用关键字枚举意味着我必须像这样输入json:
{
...
"expressions" : [
{"op": {"plus": [{"f1":1}, {"f1":2}]}},
{"op": {"less": [{"op": {"plus": [{"f1":3}, {"f1":4}]}}, {"f1":5}]}}
],
...
}这要难得多,所以我尝试使用UnkeyedDecodingContainer来避免键入表达式类型键,然后只根据给定的表达式类型解码:
enum operatorDesc : Decodable {
case plus([expressionDesc])
case less([expressionDesc])
enum key: CodingKey { case plus; case less}
enum CodingError: Error { case unknownFunction }
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: key.self)
do { let rawValue = try container.decode([expressionDesc].self, forKey: .plus); self = .plus(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { do { let rawValue = try container.decode([expressionDesc].self, forKey: .less); self = .less(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { throw CodingError.unknownFunction } }
}
}
indirect enum expressionDesc : Decodable {
case f1(f1)
case const(String)
case op(operatorDesc)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
var container = try decoder.unkeyedContainer()
do { let rawValue = try container.decode(Float.self); self = .f1(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { do { let rawValue = try container.decode(String.self); self = .const(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { do { let rawValue = try container.decode(operatorDesc.self); self = .op(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch {self = .f1(999); print("No expression found!") } } }
}
}
struct sceneDesc : Decodable {
...
let expressions : [expressionDesc]?
...
}不幸的是,由于某种原因,这并没有完全实现我所期望的解码,并抛出了“预期的数组,得到了.”当我试图将表达式输入为顶级json格式时出现错误。但是,我在表达式周围添加了额外的数组:
{
...
"expressions" : [
[{"plus": [[1], [2]]}],
[{"less": [[{"plus": [[3], [4]]}], [5]]}]
],
...
}这确实是正确的解码,输出:
Decoded f1(1.0)
Decoded f1(2.0)
Decoded plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(1.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(2.0)])
Decoded op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(1.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(2.0)]))
Decoded f1(3.0)
Decoded f1(4.0)
Decoded plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(3.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)])
Decoded op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(3.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)]))
Decoded f1(5.0)
Decoded less([Mobius.expressionDesc.op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(3.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)])), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(5.0)])
Decoded op(Mobius.operatorDesc.less([Mobius.expressionDesc.op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(3.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)])), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(5.0)]))所构造的最后表达式是:
Mobius.expressionDesc.op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(1.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(2.0)]))
Mobius.expressionDesc.op(Mobius.operatorDesc.less([Mobius.expressionDesc.op(Mobius.operatorDesc.plus([Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(3.0), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)])), Mobius.expressionDesc.f1(5.0)]))这是正确的。
我想知道的是,有什么方法可以避免json中每个表达式周围需要的额外数组[]来允许它解码吗?(这似乎只是在表达式枚举中使用UnkeyedDecodingContainer时才出现的)
而且,如果有人知道有更好的方法来达到我想要达到的目标,我会全神贯注--嵌套的do-捕获将变得非常丑陋,当我添加更多的操作时,从我所读到的内容来看,没有一种简单的方法可以解决这个问题。
发布于 2020-04-08 14:09:14
decoder.unkeyedContainer方法用于分析数组。对单个值分别使用decode.singleValueContainer是必要的:
indirect enum expressionDesc : Decodable {
case f1(f1)
case const(String)
case op(operatorDesc)
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
do { let rawValue = try container.decode(Float.self); self = .f1(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { do { let rawValue = try container.decode(String.self); self = .const(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch { do { let rawValue = try container.decode(operatorDesc.self); self = .op(rawValue); print("Decoded \(self)") }
catch {self = .f1(999); print("No expression found!") } } }
}
}我尝试了您的代码并首先解析了json,它运行得很好:
let text = """
{
"expressions" : [
{"plus": [1, 2]},
{"less": [{"plus": [3, 4]}, 5]}
]
}
"""
print(try! JSONDecoder().decode(sceneDesc.self, from: text.data(using: .utf8)!))结果:
(表达式: Optional([testapp.expressionDesc.op(testapp.operatorDesc.plus(testapp.expressionDesc.f1(1.0),testapp.expressionDesc.f1(2.0)),testapp.expressionDesc.op(testapp.operatorDesc.less([testapp.expressionDesc.op(testapp.operatorDesc.plus(testapp.expressionDesc.f1(3.0),testapp.expressionDesc.f1(4.0)),testapp.expressionDesc.f1(5.0)]))]))
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61102045
复制相似问题