在这里,类DNA的每个实例对应于一个字符串,如'GCCCAC'。可以从这些字符串构造包含Arrays的子字符串数组。对于这个字符串,有1-mers,2-mers,3-mers,4-mers,5-mers和一个6-mer:
["G", "C", "C", "C", "A", "C"]["GC", "CC", "CC", "CA", "AC"]["GCC", "CCC", "CCA", "CAC"]["GCCC", "CCCA", "CCAC"]["GCCCA", "CCCAC"]["GCCCAC"]这种模式应该是明显的。有关细节,请参阅维基。
问题是编写DNA类的shared_kmers(k,dna2)方法,它返回一个由所有对i,j组成的数组,其中这个DNA对象(接收消息)与dna2共享一个普通的k-mer,在这个dna中的位置I,在dna2的位置j。
dna1 = DNA.new('GCCCAC')
dna2 = DNA.new('CCACGC')
dna1.shared_kmers(2, dna2)
#=> [[0, 4], [1, 0], [2, 0], [3, 1], [4, 2]]
dna2.shared_kmers(2, dna1)
#=> [[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 3], [2, 4], [4, 0]]
dna1.shared_kmers(3, dna2)
#=> [[2, 0], [3, 1]]
dna1.shared_kmers(4, dna2)
#=> [[2, 0]]
dna1.shared_kmers(5, dna2)
#=> []发布于 2019-11-03 22:51:22
class DNA
attr_accessor :sequencing
def initialize(sequencing)
@sequencing = sequencing
end
def kmers(k)
@sequencing.each_char.each_cons(k).map(&:join)
end
def shared_kmers(k, dna)
kmers(k).each_with_object([]).with_index do |(kmer, result), index|
dna.kmers(k).each_with_index do |other_kmer, other_kmer_index|
result << [index, other_kmer_index] if kmer.eql?(other_kmer)
end
end
end
end
dna1 = DNA.new('GCCCAC')
dna2 = DNA.new('CCACGC')
dna1.kmers(2)
#=> ["GC", "CC", "CC", "CA", "AC"]
dna2.kmers(2)
#=> ["CC", "CA", "AC", "CG", "GC"]
dna1.shared_kmers(2, dna2)
#=> [[0, 4], [1, 0], [2, 0], [3, 1], [4, 2]]
dna2.shared_kmers(2, dna1)
#=> [[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 3], [2, 4], [4, 0]]
dna1.shared_kmers(3, dna2)
#=> [[2, 0], [3, 1]]
dna1.shared_kmers(4, dna2)
#=> [[2, 0]]
dna1.shared_kmers(5, dna2)
#=> []发布于 2019-11-04 08:02:03
我将只讨论您问题的症结所在,而不涉及类DNA。应该很容易就可以很容易地对接下来的内容进行重组。
码
def match_kmers(s1, s2, k)
h1 = dna_to_index(s1, k)
h2 = dna_to_index(s2, k)
h1.flat_map { |k,_| h1[k].product(h2[k] || []) }
end
def dna_to_index(dna, k)
dna.each_char.
with_index.
each_cons(k).
with_object({}) {|arr,h| (h[arr.map(&:first).join] ||= []) << arr.first.last}
end示例
dna1 = 'GCCCAC'
dna2 = 'CCACGC'
match_kmers(dna1, dna2, 2)
#=> [[0, 4], [1, 0], [2, 0], [3, 1], [4, 2]]
match_kmers(dna2, dna1, 2)
#=> [[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 3], [2, 4], [4, 0]]
match_kmers(dna1, dna2, 3)
#=> [[2, 0], [3, 1]]
match_kmers(dna2, dna1, 3)
#=> [[0, 2], [1, 3]]
match_kmers(dna1, dna2, 4)
#=> [[2, 0]]
match_kmers(dna2, dna1, 4)
#=> [[0, 2]]
match_kmers(dna1, dna2, 5)
#=> []
match_kmers(dna2, dna1, 5)
#=> []
match_kmers(dna1, dna2, 6)
#=> []
match_kmers(dna2, dna1, 6)
#=> [] 解释
考虑一下dna1 = 'GCCCAC'。其中包含5种2-mers (k = 2):
dna1.each_char.each_cons(2).to_a.map(&:join)
#=> ["GC", "CC", "CC", "CA", "AC"] 类似地,对于dna2 = 'CCACGC'
dna2.each_char.each_cons(2).to_a.map(&:join)
#=> ["CC", "CA", "AC", "CG", "GC"]这些是dna_to_index为dna1和dna2生成的散列的关键。哈希值是相应键从DNA字符串开始的索引数组。让我们为k = 2计算那些散列
h1 = dna_to_index(dna1, 2)
#=> {"GC"=>[0], "CC"=>[1, 2], "CA"=>[3], "AC"=>[4]}
h2 = dna_to_index(dna2, 2)
#=> {"CC"=>[0], "CA"=>[1], "AC"=>[2], "CG"=>[3], "GC"=>[4]} h1显示:
"GC"从dna1的索引0开始"CC"从dna1的指数1和2开始"CA"从dna1的索引3开始"CC"从dna1的索引4开始h2也有类似的解释。见地图和Array#product。
然后,使用方法match_kmers构造所需的索引对数组( [i, j] ),从而使h1[i] = h2[j]。
现在让我们看看为3-mers (k = 3)生成的散列:
h1 = dna_to_index(dna1, 3)
#=> {"GCC"=>[0], "CCC"=>[1], "CCA"=>[2], "CAC"=>[3]}
h2 = dna_to_index(dna2, 3)
#=> {"CCA"=>[0], "CAC"=>[1], "ACG"=>[2], "CGC"=>[3]} 我们看到dna1中的前3聚体是"GCC",从索引0开始.然而,这个3 mer在dna2中没有出现,因此在返回的数组中没有[0, X]元素(X只是一个占位符)。在第二个散列中,"CCC"也不是一个键。然而,第二个散列中存在"CCA"和"CAC",因此返回的数组是:
h1["CCA"].product(h2["CCA"]) + h1["CAC"].product(h2["CAC"])
#=> [[2, 0]] + [[3, 1]]
#=> [[2, 0], [3, 1]]发布于 2019-11-04 09:08:47
首先,我将编写一种方法来枚举给定长度的子序列(即k):
class DNA
def initialize(sequence)
@sequence = sequence
end
def each_kmer(length)
return enum_for(:each_kmer, length) unless block_given?
0.upto(@sequence.length - length) { |i| yield @sequence[i, length] }
end
end
DNA.new('GCCCAC').each_kmer(2).to_a
#=> ["GC", "CC", "CC", "CA", "AC"]在此基础上,您可以使用嵌套循环轻松地收集相同k的索引:
class DNA
# ...
def shared_kmers(length, other)
indices = []
each_kmer(length).with_index do |k, i|
other.each_kmer(length).with_index do |l, j|
indices << [i, j] if k == l
end
end
indices
end
end
dna1 = DNA.new('GCCCAC')
dna2 = DNA.new('CCACGC')
dna1.shared_kmers(2, dna2)
#=> [[0, 4], [1, 0], [2, 0], [3, 1], [4, 2]]不幸的是,上面的代码为接收器中的每个k-mer遍历other.each_kmer。我们可以通过预先构建一个包含other中每个k-mer的所有索引的散列来优化这一点:
class DNA
# ...
def shared_kmers(length, other)
hash = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = [] }
other.each_kmer(length).with_index { |k, i| hash[k] << i }
indices = []
each_kmer(length).with_index do |k, i|
hash[k].each { |j| indices << [i, j] }
end
indices
end
endhttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/58684821
复制相似问题