为了得到我想要的结果,我一直在与一个查询搏斗,并尝试各种变体。但我失败了。我希望,如果我与explain语句输出共享我尝试过的变体,任何人都可能有一个指针。
Postgres 11.6
对于下面的代码块,dimension1是一个存在于我所引用的所有表上的字段。日期只出现在sessions表中,因此为了提取特定日期的数据,我创建了一个cte filter_sessions,只获取在给定日期上出现的dimension1,然后加入到我的其他表中。这允许我的查询选择特定日期的数据,在本例中是2月6日。
这是我最初的尝试。它使用CTE,我更喜欢它的可读性,如果只运行它,我可以少写一些代码,但它没有:
with
filter_sessions as (
select
dimension1,
dimension2,
date,
channel_grouping,
device_category,
user_type
from ga_flagship_ecom.sessions
where date >= '2020-02-06'
and date <= '2020-02-06'
),
ee as (
select
e.dimension1,
e.dimension3,
case when sum(case when e.metric1 = 0 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as zero_val_product, -- roll up to event level
-- approximation for inferring if the product i a download and hence sees all the checkout steps
case when sum(case when lower(product_name) ~ 'digital|download|file' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as download
from ga_flagship_ecom.ecom e
join filter_sessions f on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
group by 1,2
),
ecom_events as (
select
ev.dimension1,
ev.dimension3,
ev.event_action,
ev.event_label,
ee.zero_val_product,
ee.download
from ga_flagship_ecom.events ev
join ee on ee.dimension1 = ev.dimension1 and ee.dimension3 = ev.dimension3
where ev.event_category = 'ecom'
)
select
s.date,
lower(s.channel_grouping) as channel_grouping,
lower(s.device_category) as device_category,
lower(s.user_type) as user_type,
lower(ev.event_action) as event_action,
lower(coalesce(ev.event_label, 'na')) as event_label,
ev.zero_val_product,
ev.download,
count(distinct s.dimension1) as sessions,
count(distinct s.dimension2) as daily_users
from filter_sessions s
join ecom_events ev on ev.dimension1 = s.dimension1
group by 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8;以下是此查询的解释输出:
GroupAggregate (cost=222818.83..222818.88 rows=1 width=188)
Group Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
CTE filter_sessions
-> Index Scan using sessions_date_idx on sessions (cost=0.56..2.78 rows=1 width=76)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2020-02-06'::date) AND (date <= '2020-02-06'::date))
CTE ee
-> GroupAggregate (cost=47604.61..47606.29 rows=48 width=38)
Group Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Sort (cost=47604.61..47604.73 rows=48 width=51)
Sort Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..47603.27 rows=48 width=51)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions f (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=32)
-> Index Scan using ecom_dimension1_idx on ecom e (cost=0.56..47602.77 rows=48 width=51)
Index Cond: ((dimension1)::text = (f.dimension1)::text)
CTE ecom_events
-> Hash Join (cost=1.68..175209.67 rows=1 width=60)
Hash Cond: (((ev_1.dimension1)::text = (ee.dimension1)::text) AND (ev_1.dimension3 = ee.dimension3))
-> Seq Scan on events ev_1 (cost=0.00..150210.69 rows=3332973 width=52)
Filter: ((event_category)::text = 'ecom'::text)
-> Hash (cost=0.96..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> CTE Scan on ee (cost=0.00..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> Sort (cost=0.08..0.08 rows=1 width=236)
Sort Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..0.07 rows=1 width=236)
Join Filter: ((s.dimension1)::text = (ev.dimension1)::text)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions s (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=164)
-> CTE Scan on ecom_events ev (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=104)有人建议cte ee是我的瓶颈,我应该关注这个问题。我尝试了一个关于cte的子查询,而不是引用cte filter_sessions。因此,改变:
ee as (
select
e.dimension1,
e.dimension3,
case when sum(case when e.metric1 = 0 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as zero_val_product, -- roll up to event level
-- approximation for inferring if the product i a download and hence sees all the checkout steps
case when sum(case when lower(product_name) ~ 'digital|download|file' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as download
from ga_flagship_ecom.ecom e
--join filter_sessions f on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
join (select dimension1 from ga_flagship_ecom.sessions where date >= '2020-02-06' and date <= '2020-02-06') f
on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
group by 1,2
),下面解释一下这个小小的改变:
GroupAggregate (cost=107619.19..107619.24 rows=1 width=188)
Group Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
CTE filter_sessions
-> Index Scan using sessions_date_idx on sessions (cost=0.56..2.78 rows=1 width=76)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2020-02-06'::date) AND (date <= '2020-02-06'::date))
CTE ee
-> GroupAggregate (cost=47606.05..47606.08 rows=1 width=38)
Group Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Sort (cost=47606.05..47606.05 rows=1 width=51)
Sort Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Nested Loop (cost=1.12..47606.04 rows=1 width=51)
-> Index Only Scan using sessions_date_idx on sessions sessions_1 (cost=0.56..2.78 rows=1 width=22)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2020-02-06'::date) AND (date <= '2020-02-06'::date))
-> Index Scan using ecom_dimension1_idx on ecom e (cost=0.56..47602.77 rows=48 width=51)
Index Cond: ((dimension1)::text = (sessions_1.dimension1)::text)
CTE ecom_events
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..60010.25 rows=1 width=60)
-> CTE Scan on ee (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=48)
-> Index Scan using events_pk on events ev_1 (cost=0.56..60010.22 rows=1 width=52)
Index Cond: (((dimension1)::text = (ee.dimension1)::text) AND (dimension3 = ee.dimension3))
Filter: ((event_category)::text = 'ecom'::text)
-> Sort (cost=0.08..0.08 rows=1 width=236)
Sort Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..0.07 rows=1 width=236)
Join Filter: ((s.dimension1)::text = (ev.dimension1)::text)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions s (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=164)
-> CTE Scan on ecom_events ev (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=104)我不知道如何解释解释输出中的数字,但是对于cte来说,这些数字实际上是相同的,所以我不认为变化会有多大影响?CTE ee-> GroupAggregate (cost=47606.05..47606.08 rows=1 width=38)
无论哪种方式,查询仍未完成。我尝试过的其他事情(都失败了,查询只是无限期地运行):
与内部联接不同,where过滤器如下所示:
ee as (
select
e.dimension1,
e.dimension3,
case when sum(case when e.metric1 = 0 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as zero_val_product, -- roll up to event level
-- approximation for inferring if the product i a download and hence sees all the checkout steps
case when sum(case when lower(product_name) ~ 'digital|download|file' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as download
from ga_flagship_ecom.ecom e
--join filter_sessions f on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
where e.dimension1 in (select dimension1 from filter_sessions)
group by 1,2
),下面是基于使用where过滤器而不是内部联接的解释输出:
GroupAggregate (cost=222818.84..222818.89 rows=1 width=188)
Group Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
CTE filter_sessions
-> Index Scan using sessions_date_idx on sessions (cost=0.56..2.78 rows=1 width=76)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2020-02-06'::date) AND (date <= '2020-02-06'::date))
CTE ee
-> GroupAggregate (cost=47604.63..47606.31 rows=48 width=38)
Group Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Sort (cost=47604.63..47604.75 rows=48 width=51)
Sort Key: e.dimension1, e.dimension3
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.58..47603.29 rows=48 width=51)
-> HashAggregate (cost=0.02..0.03 rows=1 width=32)
Group Key: (filter_sessions.dimension1)::text
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=32)
-> Index Scan using ecom_dimension1_idx on ecom e (cost=0.56..47602.77 rows=48 width=51)
Index Cond: ((dimension1)::text = (filter_sessions.dimension1)::text)
CTE ecom_events
-> Hash Join (cost=1.68..175209.67 rows=1 width=60)
Hash Cond: (((ev_1.dimension1)::text = (ee.dimension1)::text) AND (ev_1.dimension3 = ee.dimension3))
-> Seq Scan on events ev_1 (cost=0.00..150210.69 rows=3332973 width=52)
Filter: ((event_category)::text = 'ecom'::text)
-> Hash (cost=0.96..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> CTE Scan on ee (cost=0.00..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> Sort (cost=0.08..0.08 rows=1 width=236)
Sort Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..0.07 rows=1 width=236)
Join Filter: ((s.dimension1)::text = (ev.dimension1)::text)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions s (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=164)
-> CTE Scan on ecom_events ev (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=104)然后,我试图将cte ee分成两部分,如下所示:
ee_base as (
select
e.dimension1,
e.dimension3,
e.metric1,
lower(product_name) as product_name
from ga_flagship_ecom.ecom e
join filter_sessions f on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
),
ee as (
select
dimension1,
dimension3,
case when sum(case when metric1 = 0 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as zero_val_product, -- roll up to event level
-- approximation for inferring if the product i a download and hence sees all the checkout steps
case when sum(case when product_name ~ 'digital|download|file' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as download
from ee_base
group by 1,2
),这也失败了(我真的很乐观地认为这是可行的)。以下是此尝试的解释输出:
GroupAggregate (cost=222818.33..222818.38 rows=1 width=188)
Group Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
CTE filter_sessions
-> Index Scan using sessions_date_idx on sessions (cost=0.56..2.78 rows=1 width=76)
Index Cond: ((date >= '2020-02-06'::date) AND (date <= '2020-02-06'::date))
CTE ee_base
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.56..47603.39 rows=48 width=66)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions f (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=32)
-> Index Scan using ecom_dimension1_idx on ecom e (cost=0.56..47602.77 rows=48 width=51)
Index Cond: ((dimension1)::text = (f.dimension1)::text)
CTE ee
-> HashAggregate (cost=1.68..2.40 rows=48 width=48)
Group Key: ee_base.dimension1, ee_base.dimension3
-> CTE Scan on ee_base (cost=0.00..0.96 rows=48 width=76)
CTE ecom_events
-> Hash Join (cost=1.68..175209.67 rows=1 width=60)
Hash Cond: (((ev_1.dimension1)::text = (ee.dimension1)::text) AND (ev_1.dimension3 = ee.dimension3))
-> Seq Scan on events ev_1 (cost=0.00..150210.69 rows=3332973 width=52)
Filter: ((event_category)::text = 'ecom'::text)
-> Hash (cost=0.96..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> CTE Scan on ee (cost=0.00..0.96 rows=48 width=48)
-> Sort (cost=0.08..0.08 rows=1 width=236)
Sort Key: s.date, (lower((s.channel_grouping)::text)), (lower((s.device_category)::text)), (lower((s.user_type)::text)), (lower((ev.event_action)::text)), (lower((COALESCE(ev.event_label, 'na'::character varying))::text)), ev.zero_val_product, ev.download
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..0.07 rows=1 width=236)
Join Filter: ((s.dimension1)::text = (ev.dimension1)::text)
-> CTE Scan on filter_sessions s (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=164)
-> CTE Scan on ecom_events ev (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=104)真正起作用的是创建临时表。但我真的想找个办法解决这个问题,按照偏好顺序:
使用CTE's和sub queries
使用临时表
我还有什么别的事可以做吗?
发布于 2020-02-09 23:53:41
您可以简单地将CTE重写为临时视图,这些视图包含在主查询计划中。
CREATE TEMP VIEW filter_sessions as
select
dimension1,
dimension2,
zdate,
channel_grouping,
device_category,
user_type
from ga_flagship_ecom.sessions
where zdate >= '2020-02-06'
and zdate <= '2020-02-06'
;
CREATE TEMP VIEW ee as
select
e.dimension1,
e.dimension3,
case when sum(case when e.metric1 = 0 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as zero_val_product, -- roll up to event level
-- approximation for inferring if the product i a download and hence sees all the checkout steps
case when sum(case when lower(product_name) ~ 'digital|download|file' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 then 1 else 0 end as download
from ga_flagship_ecom.ecom e
join filter_sessions f on f.dimension1 = e.dimension1
group by 1,2
;
CREATE TEMP VIEW ecom_events as
select
ev.dimension1,
ev.dimension3,
ev.event_action,
ev.event_label,
ee.zero_val_product,
ee.download
from ga_flagship_ecom.events ev
join ee on ee.dimension1 = ev.dimension1 and ee.dimension3 = ev.dimension3
where ev.event_category = 'ecom'
;
select
s.zdate,
lower(s.channel_grouping) as channel_grouping,
lower(s.device_category) as device_category,
lower(s.user_type) as user_type,
lower(ev.event_action) as event_action,
lower(coalesce(ev.event_label, 'na')) as event_label,
ev.zero_val_product,
ev.download,
count(distinct s.dimension1) as sessions,
count(distinct s.dimension2) as daily_users
from filter_sessions s
join ecom_events ev on ev.dimension1 = s.dimension1
group by 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8;https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60141687
复制相似问题