blocks|key|840283|text|我使用QualityCenter/TestDirectory已经很长时间了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|840284|我现在正在使用testlink，而且我必须说，到目前为止，我更喜欢QualityCenter/TestDirectory，即使它是基于一些by的ActiveX控件的。|840285|QualityCenter/TestDirectory更易于使用，接口也更好。|840286|TestLink和QualityCenter/TestDirectory主要用于手动测试用例(但是，您可以在QualityCenter/TestDirectory上使用Quick来自动化测试)。|840287|Fitnesse是我心目中的另一种工具:基本上，您可以在wiki上编写测试用例，并将其链接到JUnit测试。另一个类似的工具是GreenPepper、Concordion等。|840288|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

I've used QualityCenter/TestDirectory for a long time.

I'm now using testlink and I must say that I prefer QualityCenter/TestDirectory by far, even if it based on some buggy ActiveX control.

QualityCenter/TestDirectory is more easier to use and the interface is quite better.

TestLink and QualityCenter/TestDirectory are mainly for manual test case (however, you can use Quick Test Pro on QualityCenter/TestDirectory to automatize your tests).

Fitnesse is another kind of tool in my mind : basically, you write your test case on a wiki and link that to a JUnit test. Another tools like that are GreenPepper, Concordion, etc.

blocks|key|155281|text|您绝对应该尝试http://www.klaros-testmanagement.com，它有一个免费的、不受限制的Community。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|155282|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.klaros-testmanagement.com/^0|7|10|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

You should definitely try out Klaros-Testmanagement <a href="http://www.klaros-testmanagement.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.klaros-testmanagement.com</a> which has an free, unrestricted Community Edition.

blocks|key|840270|text|是的，我们确实进行了测试，但没有我想要的那么多！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|840271|我强烈推荐TestLink+--链接到的工具列表显示，它的下载量比所有其他工具加起来的都多。|offset|length|840272|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://testlink.sourceforge.net/docs/testLink.php^0|0|5|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

Yes, we do run tests, but not nearly as many as I'd like !

I highly recommend <a href="http://testlink.sourceforge.net/docs/testLink.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TestLink</a> - the list of tools that you linked to shows that it's had more downloads than all of the other tools put together.

blocks|key|844299|text|PractiTest是一个非常好的选择。不是免费的，但价格很低-+http://www.practitest.com|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|844300|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.practitest.com/^0|X|P|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

PractiTest is a very good option. Not free but very affordable - <a href="http://www.practitest.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.practitest.com</a>

blocks|key|1154510|text|在这个问题上有点晚了，但我不得不建议您尝试使用TestLodge进行手动测试管理。它的工作方式模拟TestLink所做的，但它提供了一个更专业的界面，我们也允许我们的客户使用他们的uat阶段。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1154511|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.testlodge.com/^0|N|9|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

A little late on this one, but I would have to suggest you try <a href="http://www.testlodge.com" rel="nofollow">TestLodge</a> for your manual test management. It works in a simular way to what TestLink does, but it gives off a more professional interface and is something that we also allow our clients to use for their uat phase.

blocks|key|844231|text|我们使用质量中心/测试主任的材料。据我所知，它很贵，而且也没那么好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|844232|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

We use Quality Center / Test Director stuff. Its expensive as far as I know, and it's not that great.

blocks|key|155223|text|我听说过菲尼斯的优点，但我不知道它有多好，测试跟踪。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|155224|我知道我最近刚看到了一个漂亮的Trac测试追踪器，但我现在找不到了.|155225|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://fitnesse.org/^0|4|3|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

I've heard good things about <a href="http://fitnesse.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Fitnesse</a> but I don't know how good it's test tracking is.

I know I just recently saw a slick looking test tracker for Trac or something, but I can't find it now...

blocks|key|155245|text|质量中心。它很贵，但它是最好的|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|155246|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Quality Center. It's expensive, but it is the best

blocks|key|155261|text|我是帕特里克-好的办公室工具:)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|155262|我只是用微软Word写我的|155263|这是我开发的结构：编写系统测试计划。|offset|length|155264|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://pm4web.blogspot.com/2008/07/writing-system-test-plan.html^0|0|0|9|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

I'm with Patrick - good ol' office tools :)

I just write mine in Microsoft Word

This is the structure I developed: <a href="http://pm4web.blogspot.com/2008/07/writing-system-test-plan.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Writing a System Test Plan</a>.

blocks|key|844237|text|有一个想法，也许不是一个好主意，就是在您的票务系统运行时，让每个测试都向它提交一张票证，指示测试名称、构建版本、日期和测试结果。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|844238|这将使结果可以在以后搜索。|844239|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

One thought, and perhaps not a good one, would be to have every test submit a ticket to your ticketing system when it's run indicating the test name, build version, and date, and test results.

That would make the results searchable later-on.

blocks|key|1154367|text|我们使用了一个本土的Access数据库。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1154368|这个数据库跟踪我们的需求、测试用例、测试计划和测试运行。我们能够生产最新的RVTM，根据计划跟踪进度，并将任务分配给测试人员。我们将其与Outlook集成，因此每个测试人员都由QA领导从计划中分配任务。当它们完成后，他们只需在Outlook中勾选它并更新数据库。|1154369|对于我们的小型测试团队来说，它工作得很好，我们可以随意定制它。|1154370|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

We use a home-grown Access database. 

This database keeps track of our requirements, test cases, test plan and test runs. We're able to produce an up-to-date RVTM, keep track of progress against the plan, and assign tasks to testers. We integrated it with Outlook, so each tester is assigned a task from the plan by the QA lead. When they're complete, they just tick it off in Outlook and it updates the database.

For our small team of testers it works nicely, and we're free to customize it however we want.

I'm looking for a good, preferably free, test planning and documentation tool. Ideally something that will keep track of which tests have been run against which software version, with reporting ability. There's a whole bunch of tools listed <a href="http://www.opensourcetesting.org/testmgt.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> but are there any others, and which ones have you had the best experience with? (You do run tests, right?)

UPDATE 2008-01-29

So far <a href="http://testlink.sourceforge.net/docs/testLink.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TestLink</a> and <a href="http://fitnesse.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Fitness</a> have been mentioned. <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/166103/free-program-for-building-managing-test-plans">A related question</a> yielded also a link to the <a href="http://readyset.tigris.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ReadySet</a> project, an open collection of software planning documentation templates.

I have used TestLink and found it okayish, but I cannot say I enjoyed using it. Has anyone had any experience with Fitnesse? Or are there any other free tools out there that you have used and found satisfactory?

Test planning/documentation/management tools

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云AI代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

功能1上新10个字符

功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符功能2描述100个字符。

功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符功能2上新100个字符。

功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符功能5描述100个字符

功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符功能5上新100个字符

功能4上新

文章&问答评论现已支持表情

全新交互，全新视觉，新增快捷键、悬浮工具栏、高亮块等功能并同时优化现有功能，全面提升创作效率和体验

社区富文本编辑器全新改版！诚邀体验～ 

精选全网热门MCP server，让你的AI更好用 🚀

💥开发者 MCP广场重磅上线！

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我正在寻找一个好的，最好是免费的，测试计划和文档工具。理想情况下，可以跟踪哪些测试是针对哪个软件版本运行的，并且具有报告能力。有很多工具列出了，但是还有其他工具吗?您有过最好的经验吗？(你确实做测试，对吗？)更新2008-01-29到目前为止，已经提到了和。还提供了一个指向项目的链接，这是一个开放的软件计划文档模板集合。我使用过TestLink，发现它很好，但我不能说我喜欢使用它。有人跟菲尼斯有过

问测试计划/文档/管理工具
EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问测试计划/文档/管理工具EN

回答 11

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问测试计划/文档/管理工具
EN