这是可行的:
use Moops;
class Foo :ro {
use Types::Common::Numeric qw(PositiveOrZeroInt);
has from => required => true, isa => PositiveOrZeroInt;
has to => required => true, isa => PositiveOrZeroInt, trigger => method($to) {
die 'must be from ≤ to' unless $self->from <= $to
};
}
Foo->new(from => 0, to => 1); # ok
Foo->new(from => 1, to => 0); # "must be from ≤ to at …"我希望能够以某种方式使约束成为类型的一部分。
use Moops;
class Bar :ro {
use Types::Common::Numeric qw(PositiveOrZeroInt);
has from => required => true, isa => PositiveOrZeroInt;
has to => required => true, isa => PositiveOrZeroInt->where(sub {
$self->from <= $_
});
}
Bar->new(from => 0, to => 1);
# Global symbol "$self" requires explicit package name
# (did you forget to declare "my $self"?)我检查了where sub是否只接收一个参数。
发布于 2020-11-05 22:44:22
如果你想在类型检查中做到这一点,你可以将这两个属性组合成一个属性,该属性将是一个包含两个数字的arrayref。
use Moops;
class Foo :ro {
use Types::Standard qw(Tuple);
use Types::Common::Numeric qw(PositiveOrZeroInt);
has from_and_to => (
required => true,
isa => Tuple->of(PositiveOrZeroInt, PositiveOrZeroInt)->where(sub {
$_->[0] <= $_->[1];
}),
# Provide `from` and `to` methods to fetch values
handles_via => 'Array',
handles => {
'from' => [ get => 0 ],
'to' => [ get => 1 ],
},
);
# Allow `from` and `to` to be separate in the constructor
method BUILDARGS {
my %args = ( @_==1 ? %{$_[0]} : @_ );
$args{from_and_to} ||= [ $args{from}, $args{to} ];
\%args;
}
}
Foo->new(from => 0, to => 1); # ok
Foo->new(from => 1, to => 0); # "must be from ≤ to at …"不过,我不会在类型检查中这样做。如果属性是只读的,我会用BUILD (不,不是BUILDARGS),如果属性是读写的,我会用trigger。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64696366
复制相似问题