将Type2Dimension驻留在Impala表中,该表有大约500M行,有102列:(C1,C2,...,C8,...C100,Eff_DT,EXP_DT)只需要选择具有不同组合值( C1,C2,..,C8)的行。对于每个选定的记录,EFF_DT和EXP_DT必须分别是该记录所属组的最小值(Eff_dt)和最大值(Eff_dt)(此处的组由不同的组合(C1,C2,..,C8)定义)
简单的Group By不会解决这里的问题,因为它将省略同一组的时间延迟……
为了简单起见,这里是我所需要的,也是我尝试过的--假设只有2列定义了一个组(而不是8列),这里是一个输入、期望输出和输出的例子,只使用group by ...
--INPUT --DESIRED OUTPUT --OUTPUT of SIMPLE GROUP BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C1 C2 EFF_DT EXP_DT C1 C2 Eff_dt EXP_DT C1 C2 EFF_DT EXP_DT
4 8 2013-11-30 2014-01-22 4 8 2013-11-30 2014-01-22 4 8 2013-11-30 2999-12-31
2 8 2014-01-23 2014-01-23 2 8 2014-01-23 2014-01-23 2 8 2014-01-23 2014-01-23
4 8 2014-01-24 2015-12-31 4 8 2014-01-24 2999-12-31
4 8 2016-01-01 2016-12-31
4 8 2017-01-01 2018-03-15
4 8 2018-03-16 2018-07-24
4 8 2018-07-25 2999-12-31尝试在select语句中使用子查询根据当前行选择最大值(Exp_dt),但不起作用,因为impala不支持它.....
下面是我尝试过的查询,它工作得很好,但不能在Impala中运行(因为select语句中不支持子查询
SELECT
T0.C1,
T0.C2,
MIN(T0.EFF_DT) AS MIN_EFF_DT,
T0.EXP_DT
FROM (
SELECT
T1.C1,
T1.C2,
T1.EFF_DT,
(
SELECT MAX(T2.EXP_DT)
FROM (select * from TABLE_NAME ) T2
WHERE T2.C1 = T1.C1
AND T2.C2 = T1.C2
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM (select * from TABLE_NAME) T3
WHERE T3.EXP_DT < T2.EXP_DT
AND T3.EXP_DT > T1.EXP_DT
AND (T3.C1 <> T2.C1 OR T3.C2 <> T2.C2 )
)
) EXP_DT
FROM (select * from TABLE_NAME) T1
) T0
GROUP BY
T0.C1,
T0.C2,
T0.EXP_DT
ORDER BY MIN_EFF_DT ASC发布于 2019-11-20 04:16:49
很有可能,以前的解决方案在为id列进行修改时也会起作用:
select id, c1, c2, min(eff_dt), max(exp_dt)
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by id order by eff_dt) as seqnum,
row_number() over (partition by id, c1, c2 order by eff_dt) as seqnum_1
from t
) t
group by id, c1, c2, (seqnum - seqnum_1);您应该能够像使用一样扩展列数。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58940019
复制相似问题