我有以下表格(简化版):
CREATE TABLE groups
( id PRIMARY KEY,
path ltree,
...
);
CREATE TABLE items
( id bigserial,
path ltree,
...
PRIMARY KEY (id, path)
);对于每个项目,也有该项目所属的组的列表。组由其完整路径表示。最多可能有10M个项目,每个项目属于大约20个组。
我需要设计以下查询。给定(a)“父”组和(b)最多10个附加组的列表,找出在其子树中具有至少一个包含在搜索标准中的每个组中的项的“父”组的那些直系后代。
例如,给定父组"NorthAmerica.USA“和附加组"CandyLovers.ChocolateLovers”、"Athletes.Footballers",如果在像"NorthAmerica.USA.CA.LosAngeles“、”Athletes.Footballers“、”"CandyLovers.ChocolateLovers.ChocolateDonutLovers“”这样的组中存在像"George“这样的项,则结果是"NorthAmerica.USA.CA”
我尝试了几种不同的方法来编写查询,它们的伸缩性非常差:只需几分钟就可以返回一组1M个项目的结果,并在搜索条件中返回3-4个路径。例如:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT *
FROM groups
WHERE path ~ CAST ('1.2.22' || '.*{1}' AS lquery)
AND EXISTS
(SELECT 1
FROM
(SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT leaf_paths_sans_result_path.path) AS paths_of_a_match,
max(path_count) AS path_count
FROM items,
(SELECT path,
count(*) OVER() AS path_count
FROM (
VALUES (groups.path) , ('1.3'),('1.4')) t (path)) leaf_paths_sans_result_path
WHERE 1 = 1
AND items.path <@ leaf_paths_sans_result_path.path
GROUP BY id) items_by_id
WHERE cardinality(paths_of_a_match) = path_count );结果如下:
Index Scan using idx_groups__path__gist on groups (cost=0.28..37013.74 rows=38 width=469) (actual time=11.735..322285.421 rows=950 loops=1)
Index Cond: (path ~ '1.2.22.*{1}'::lquery)
Filter: (SubPlan 1)
Rows Removed by Filter: 3
SubPlan 1
-> Subquery Scan on items_by_id (cost=0.55..1809359.86 rows=3752 width=0) (actual time=338.162..338.162 rows=1 loops=953)
-> GroupAggregate (cost=0.55..1809322.34 rows=3752 width=65) (actual time=338.159..338.159 rows=1 loops=953)
Group Key: ibt.id
Filter: (cardinality(array_agg(DISTINCT "*VALUES*".column1)) >= max(3))
Rows Removed by Filter: 7845
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.55..1809228.54 rows=3752 width=65) (actual time=0.044..307.087 rows=20423 loops=953)
Join Filter: (ibt.path <@ "*VALUES*".column1)
Rows Removed by Join Filter: 651228
-> Index Scan using idx_items__id on items (cost=0.55..1752954.06 rows=1250543 width=193) (actual time=0.007..110.517 rows=223884 loops=953)
-> Materialize (cost=0.00..0.05 rows=3 width=32) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=3 loops=213361141)
-> Values Scan on "*VALUES*" (cost=0.00..0.04 rows=3 width=32) (actual time=0.002..0.003 rows=3 loops=953)
Planning time: 3.151 ms
Execution time: 322286.404 ms
(18 rows)我可以根据需要更改数据模型,以便针对此查询进行优化。我运行的是PostgreSQL 9.5版
非常感谢!很抱歉问了一个乱七八糟的问题。
发布于 2018-03-26 17:23:46
看起来你在用ltree module?以下查询将避免使用中间array_agg数组:
select *
from items i
join groups g
on i.groups = g.id
where g.path ~ '1.2.22.*' and
(
i.path ~ '*.1.3.*' or
i.path ~ '*.1.4.*'
)
group by
g.id
having count(distinct
case
when i.path ~ '*.1.3.*' then 1
when i.path ~ '*.1.4.*' then 2
end) = 2count构造断言满足两个条件,而不仅仅是匹配相同模式的两行。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49485196
复制相似问题