也许我在做一些愚蠢的事情,但我得到了:
No instance for (MonadException Ti)
arising from a use of `getInputLine'在代码示例中:
module Foo where
import System.Console.Haskeline
import System.Console.Haskeline.MonadException
import Control.Monad.State
import Control.Monad.IO.Class
type Ti = StateT Int IO
action :: String -> Ti ()
action s = do
n <- get
lift $ putStrLn $ show n ++ ": " ++ s
repl :: InputT Ti ()
repl = do
minput <- getInputLine "?"
case minput of
Nothing -> return ()
Just input -> lift (action input) >> repl现在,System.Console.Haskeline.MonadException定义了
MonadException IO
(MonadIO (StateT s m), MonadException m) => MonadException (StateT s m)和Control.Monad.IO.Class
MonadIO IO
MonadIO m => MonadIO (StateT s m)那么,它不应该自动推导出Ti的实例吗?
发布于 2013-06-06 00:26:30
没有Lazy状态转换器的实例,只有严格的实例。使用import Control.Monad.State.Strict。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16944016
复制相似问题