我的旧代码看起来像下面这样,所有的db调用都是阻塞的。
我需要帮助将此转换为使用Futures。
def getUserPoints(username: String): Option[Long]
db.getUserPoints(username) match {
case Some(userPoints) => Some(userPoints.total)
case None => {
if (db.getSomething("abc").isEmpty) {
db.somethingElse("asdf") match {
case Some(pointId) => {
db.setPoints(pointId, username)
db.findPointsForUser(username)
}
case _ => None
}
} else {
db.findPointsForUser(username)
}
}
}
}我的新API位于我返回Futures的地方。
db.getUserPoints(username: String): Future[Option[UserPoints]]
db.getSomething(s: String): Future[Option[Long]]
db.setPoints(pointId, username): Future[Unit]
db.findPointsForUser(username): Future[Option[Long]]我怎样才能将上面的代码转换为使用我的新API呢?
我尝试使用for-compr,但开始遇到像FutureNothing这样奇怪的错误。
var userPointsFut: Future[Long] = for {
userPointsOpt <- db.getUserPoints(username)
userPoints <- userPointsOpt
} yield userPoints.total但所有的分支和if子句以及试图将其转换为期货,都会变得有点棘手。
发布于 2016-10-21 02:24:36
我认为这种设计的第一个问题是,对Future的阻塞调用的端口不应该包装Option类型:
阻塞调用:def giveMeSomethingBlocking(for:Id): Option[T]应该变成:def giveMeSomethingBlocking(for:Id): Future[T],而不是:def giveMeSomethingBlocking(for:Id): Future[Option[T]]
阻塞调用提供了一个值Some(value)或None,非阻塞未来版本提供了一个Success(value)或Failure(exception),它以非阻塞方式完全保留了Option语义。
考虑到这一点,我们可以在Future上使用组合子对所讨论的过程进行建模。让我们看看如何:
首先,让我们将API重构为我们可以使用的东西:
type UserPoints = Long
object db {
def getUserPoints(username: String): Future[UserPoints] = ???
def getSomething(s: String): Future[UserPoints] = ???
def setPoints(pointId:UserPoints, username: String): Future[Unit] = ???
def findPointsForUser(username: String): Future[UserPoints] = ???
}
class PointsNotFound extends Exception("bonk")
class StuffNotFound extends Exception("sthing not found")然后,该过程将如下所示:
def getUserPoints(username:String): Future[UserPoints] = {
db.getUserPoints(username)
.map(userPoints => userPoints /*.total*/)
.recoverWith{
case ex:PointsNotFound =>
(for {
sthingElse <- db.getSomething("abc")
_ <- db.setPoints(sthingElse, username)
points <- db.findPointsForUser(username)
} yield (points))
.recoverWith{
case ex: StuffNotFound => db.findPointsForUser(username)
}
}
}哪种类型检查正确。
编辑
由于API是一成不变的,处理嵌套的一元类型的一种方法是定义一个MonadTransformer。简而言之,让我们让Future[Option[T]]成为一个新的单子,让我们称之为FutureO,它可以与同类产品组合在一起。1
case class FutureO[+A](future: Future[Option[A]]) {
def flatMap[B](f: A => FutureO[B])(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): FutureO[B] = {
val newFuture = future.flatMap{
case Some(a) => f(a).future
case None => Future.successful(None)
}
FutureO(newFuture)
}
def map[B](f: A => B)(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): FutureO[B] = {
FutureO(future.map(option => option map f))
}
def recoverWith[U >: A](pf: PartialFunction[Throwable, FutureO[U]])(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): FutureO[U] = {
val futOtoFut: FutureO[U] => Future[Option[U]] = _.future
FutureO(future.recoverWith(pf andThen futOtoFut))
}
def orElse[U >: A](other: => FutureO[U])(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): FutureO[U] = {
FutureO(future.flatMap{
case None => other.future
case _ => this.future
})
}
}现在我们可以重写我们的流程,保留与基于未来的组合相同的结构。
type UserPoints = Long
object db {
def getUserPoints(username: String): Future[Option[UserPoints]] = ???
def getSomething(s: String): Future[Option[Long]] = ???
def setPoints(pointId: UserPoints, username:String): Future[Unit] = ???
def findPointsForUser(username: String): Future[Option[Long]] = ???
}
class PointsNotFound extends Exception("bonk")
class StuffNotFound extends Exception("sthing not found")
def getUserPoints2(username:String): Future[Option[UserPoints]] = {
val futureOpt = FutureO(db.getUserPoints(username))
.map(userPoints => userPoints /*.total*/)
.orElse{
(for {
sthingElse <- FutureO(db.getSomething("abc"))
_ <- FutureO(db.setPoints(sthingElse, username).map(_ => Some(())))
points <- FutureO(db.findPointsForUser(username))
} yield (points))
.orElse{
FutureO(db.findPointsForUser(username))
}
}
futureOpt.future
}1,并向http://loicdescotte.github.io/posts/scala-compose-option-future/致谢
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40161024
复制相似问题